Quantcast
Channel: OMNI's War and Warming Anthologies

ANTICIPATING ISRAELI BDS DAY (BOYCOTT, DIVESTMENT, SANCTIONS) AND PALESTINIAN LAND DAY, MARCH 30, 2025, Today January 30, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI

ANTICIPATING ISRAELI BDS DAY (BOYCOTT, DIVESTMENT, SANCTIONS) AND PALESTINIAN LAND DAY, MARCH 30, 2025, Today January 30, 2025.

COMPILED BY DICK BENNETT FOR A CULTURE OF PEACE, JUSTICE, AND ECOLOGY.

https://omnicenter.org/DONATE/

 

Also see:   International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, Nov. 29.   https://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2021/11/un-international-day-in-solidarity-with.html

 

Local Actions

Tonight JANUARY 30, 2025 6:30 AT OMNI

Boycott Documentary Screening and Discussion

FAYETTEVILLE Friendsofpalestinenwa  

 

 

 

 

 Here is a reminder to come join us to watch Boycott and explore the intersection of civil rights, activism, and the legal system tonight.

 

 Date: January 30th

 Time: 6:30pm

 LocationOMNI Center, 3274 N Lee Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703

 

Did you know that Arkansas became a battleground over the right to boycott? "Boycott" delves into the stories of individuals, including a newspaper editor from Arkansas, who took a stand against anti-boycott laws that target free speech and activism, including support for the BDS (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) movement.

 

The film follows three Americans who take on anti-boycott laws in a fight for free speech in "Boycott". Attorney Mikkel Jordahl, speech therapist Bahia Amawi, and Arkansas Times publisher Alan Leveritt each face personal and professional challenges after refusing to sign pledges against boycotting Israel. From Arizona to Texas to Arkansas, their legal battles reveal the far-reaching implications of these laws on democracy and individual rights.  

See you there!    Friends of Palestine NWA

 

Emergency Protest for Rafah/Gaza  2-13-24

(It's late in the day but can you please post this? )

Hands off Rafah!

Emergency Protest

Washington County Courthouse, Fayetteville

5:00 PM Today Feb 13

 

Sponsored by: NWA for Palestine, Friends of Palestine NWA, Christian Voice for Peace

Happening in Rafah now

https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?hspart=sz&hsimp=yhs-001&type=type7015493-spa-89901-89902&param1=89901&param2=89902&p=rafah+gaza+right+now&grd=1

 

TEXTS National and International
A Brief selection mainly of divestments during 2024, ending with a meditation on Picasso’s Guernica.

 “Downward spiral of a genocidal Israel”

From via Truthdig, Sonny San Juan via uark.onmicrosoft.com   1-3-25

 

 

 

Jan 2, 2025, Truthdig, Arun Guptahttps://www.truthdig.com/articles/israels-downward-spiral/

Israel’s Downward SpiralL  The nation's success on the battlefield masks the beating it is taking as an international pariah.

Israel is riding high after carrying out the most audacious campaign of military conquest of any nation since the 1940s. Following the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks, Israel has begun an open-ended occupation in Lebanon, seized Syrian territory twice the size of Gaza, wiped 50 Palestinian villages “off the map” in the West Bank, bombed Iran and Yemen, and weathered more than a year of resistance, global revulsion and protest, while carrying out a horrific genocide in Gaza that has no end in sight. 

From the beginning, Israel has enjoyed the full support of the Biden administration — militarily, financially, politically, diplomatically and morally. Israel’s extermination of children, families, aid workers, doctors, teachers and artists has earned it only a few occasional peeps of official protest from Washington, while regional powers such as Turkey and Saudi Arabia are trying to have it both ways. They have reduced economic and political ties with Israel to pacify domestic anger, while quietly aiding it because their governments are aligned with U.S. interests. 

But this moment doesn’t represent the triumph of Zionism so much as the beginning of the end. Israel has become an international pariah, led by an incompetent and corrupt government, and it is experiencing a debilitating brain drain. Its society is riven by multiple fractures, with deep political divisions and intractable conflicts, not just between Jews and Palestinians and Israeli Arabs, or those for or against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right government, but between secular Jews and a growing ultra-Orthodox population. 

Meanwhile, the gulf between Israel and the rest of the world has never been deeper. In January, a Tel Aviv University poll showed almost universal backing among Israeli Jews for its war on Palestinians with 95% either believing the military was using the right amount of force in Gaza or too little. Nearly 60% support killing all 2.3 million residents of Gaza through starvation. Outside of the West, opposition to Israeli savagery is nearly universal and has reinvigorated the 2005 call by Palestinian civil society for “boycott, divestments and sanctions against Israel until it complies with international law and universal principles of human rights,” as well as the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel initiated the previous year. 

This moment doesn’t represent the triumph of Zionism, so much as the beginning of the end.

On top of this political and economic isolation, Israel’s embrace of endless war and Jewish supremacy is creating self-inflicted wounds. While the country depends on Washington for its power and impunity, no amount of weapons and dollars can prop up a regime festering with rot. Higher taxes, government expenses, inflation, reduced social services, shocking levels of poverty intensified by the war and mounting international pressure — all are exacerbating a brain drain that threatens to enervate the Israeli economy. 

Young, well-educated Israelis are fleeing abroad to escape a government power grab in the guise of a proposed judicial “reform” that critics argue would “codify the subjugation of women” and the LGBTQ community. The planned overhaul of the legal system, experts warn, would “pave the way for unbridled corruption, infringement of individual rights and harm to the public interest.” In 2023, prior to the start of the genocide, one study found Israeli emigration had leaped by 42% compared to previous years. The study author warned that losing tens of thousands of high-tech workers, physicians and senior academic faculty “could generate catastrophic consequences for the entire country.” Close to 1 million Jewish Israelis have dual citizenship, and a high portion of them are bilingual, meaning they can easily emigrate. 

Numbers for 2024 are murky, but emigration appears to have turned into a flood. In the first nine months of 2024, Canada approved 7,800 work permits for Israelis. That’s five times the rate for all of 2023. During the same period, more than 18,400 Israelis applied for German citizenship, which is more than three times the 5,700 Israelis who did so in 2022. The brain drain extends to Israeli Arabs as well. 

For many secular Israeli Jews, the war is “the last straw” that has exposed an onerous double burden: They pay taxes and serve in the military, while the far-right government, which relies on religious parties to stay in power, protects ultra-Orthodox men from the draft. Ending the war will only revive long-broiling secular-religious strife over suffocating religious laws and policies that provide “a vast system of government subsidies, stipends and other benefits” that allows half of Orthodox men to avoid work as full-time yeshiva students.

There are also external pressures. Many Israelis are asking why they would want to live in a pariah state, “a symbol of oppression, immorality and illiberalism,” as New York Times columnist Ezra Klein put it in an interview with Haaretz.

One little-reported phenomenon is how campus protests in solidarity with Gaza — which spread to more than 140 U.S. universities and 25 countries by May — supercharged the movement to boycott, divest from and impose sanctions on Israel. In their wake, the rector of Hebrew University in Jerusalem noted a “tsunami” of boycotts, saying, “I can’t count the number of academic relations that have been suspended or even broken off.” This led to a “barrage” of conference invitations withdrawn, papers pulled from review and funding halted, according to Bloomberg. Some 20 universities in Europe and Canada have cut ties with Israeli universities and academics since last spring.

Haaretz admits that the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement is “working vigorously and effectively in the cultural realm,” which has made life more difficult for those working in international fields, particularly science and the arts. In October, hundreds of prominent authors signed a letter vowing not to “work with Israeli cultural institutions that are complicit or have remained silent observers of the overwhelming oppression of Palestinians.” Meanwhile, refusals to work with Israel’s film and TV industry are limiting its reach, and boycotts by musicians are deepening its isolation. 

The hardest blows to Israel are directly economic. Turkey, a major economic partner with Israel with $8 billion in bilateral trade, has reduced its business with and is under popular pressure to crack down on third-party shipments to Israel. Colombia, Israel’s top supplier of coal, has stopped exports of the fuel that accounts for 20% of Israel’s electricity supply. Nor is Israel’s military immune from international opprobrium. Belgium, Spain, Canada, the Netherlands, Italy, Germany and Britain have banned or restricted weapons sales. Israeli weapons makers have been nixed from or skipped military trade shows. . . .  MORE  https://www.truthdig.com/articles/israels-downward-spiral/

For many secular Israeli Jews, the war is “the last straw.”

Under pressure “from activists and governments,” many financial firms, including sovereign wealth funds, pension funds and companies in France, Italy, Ireland, Norway, Denmark and the United Kingdom, have divested from Israel or companies connected to the war and occupation. 

In June, Israel was dealt an especially painful blow when Intel announced it was suspending work on a $25-billion chip plant that would have employed 12,000 people, although there is no evidence it was connected to the war. Intel Israel has also laid off hundreds of employees, and Samsung Next, which funded 70 Israeli companies and startups over a decade, shut down operations in Tel Aviv in 2024. Pret A Manger dropped plans to open 40 stores. Starbucks and McDonald’s admitted pro-Palestine boycotts have contributed to declining profits.

Israel’s tech industry accounts for 20% of gross domestic product and 53% of exports. It prides itself as the “startup nation,” but that’s more myth than reality. Over the past decade, Israeli startups have dwindled 45% to fewer than 800 in 2023, and only 5% of those raise more than $50 million. Israel’s high-tech sector, meanwhile, has slipped to 2018 levels, and venture capital fundraising has sunk by 70%. One entrepreneur said the loss of funding is “directly tied to the Gaza War.”

All of this points to Israel edging toward a vicious cycle. As its workforce shrinks in medicine, technology and academia, Israel’s tax base declines, its capacity for innovation and ability to attract talent diminishes, and staying becomes less and less desirable for those remaining. 

These problems are compounded by hits to other sectors. Tourism has been virtually wiped out, with an estimated $5.2-billion loss from pre-pandemic levels. Agriculture has seen a 30% drop in output that has pushed up the price of meat by 7% and produce by 9%. Local businesses are on track to record 50% more closures in 2024 than in a normal year. And a staggering 29% of Israelis now live in poverty, and one in four are food insecure.

Israel’s cost of insuring debt has tripled since the genocide began. Foreign direct investment plunged 29% in 2023 and probably fell further in 2024, and foreign investors have dumped nearly $13 billion in Israeli stocks and bonds. True to form, Wall Street banks are benefiting from Israel’s pain by notching higher profits from volatility in its bonds and currencies caused by the war. That is costing Israel money, as currency gyrations increase the cost of importing and exporting goods.

Meanwhile, international agencies such as Moody’s have lowered Israel’s credit to a few notches above junk bond rating, citing politics as an economic threat — namely the “high social tensions” resulting from changes to the judiciary and allowing the ultra-Orthodox to avoid military service.

Here, again, the divide between religious and secular Israelis poses perhaps the greatest long-term threat to Israel and the Zionist project. The Haredim have a far higher birth rate than secular Jews, and because community patriarchs keep them poorly educated to control them, it’s estimated that in a decade or so Israel’s high-tech economy will be unsustainable, as its skilled workforce will have evaporated.

A competent government might be able to help the country weather these crises. But Netanyahu’s ruling coalition is singularly focused on “looting” government coffers to reward religious fanatics and violent settlers.

All of this points to Israel edging toward a vicious cycle.

The crisis has come to a head in the government’s proposed budget for 2025, which “includes some of the biggest spending cuts and tax increases Israelis have ever known, in order to finance the war.” The budget slashes spending on health, welfare and aid to the elderly, disabled and Holocaust survivors. At the same time Netanyahu, has been pushing a bill to “subsidize day care for children of full-time yeshiva students who dodge the draft.”

The far right that effectively controls Israel is banking on being able to soak secular Jews for taxes as they do all the fighting and keep the economy humming while trying to subject them to a prejudiced religious judicial system. Arabs and ultra-Orthodox make up 35% of Israel’s population, but less than 5% of tech workers.

Israel has wounded itself deeply through external brutality and internal bigotry. Add to that the small but regular cuts that the BDS movement is inflicting on it, and the state has become far more fragile, far more quickly, than many had imagined possible.

January 2, 2025

SHARE WITH YOUR EMAIL LISTS AND CONTACTS

Please send these articles to our senators and representatives with any comments you want to add.  They need to know this information.  They are so mis-informed.  Constituents writing through their contact page gets more attention and consideration.  Get your friends, families, and email lists to join you.

Join me in sending articles with excerpts and notes to our Sens and Reps

Website to look up your senator: https://www.senate.gov/

Website to look up your representative: https://www.house.gov/

Go to your congress persons contact page to send them your message.

Thanks,    Beth Angel 

Barclays Divest From Elbit Systems After Direct Action CampaignBy Palestine Action. Popular Resistance.org (11-2-24).   After a year-long campaign against its premises by Palestine Action and local community groups, Barclays PLC has sold all of its shareholdings in Elbit Systems Ltd (ELST). Until recently, Barclays owned over 16,000 shares in Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest weapons company. Starting just over one year ago, Palestine Action’s campaign saw activists undertake 54 actions against Barclays premises nation-wide. Smashing branch windows, spraying them in blood-red paint, many of these actions put Barclays sites out of operation for weeks, actions which sought to raise the costs associated with dealing with Elbit. -more-

 Doing Time For PalestineBy Corinna G. Barnard, Consortium News.  Popular Resistance.org (11-1-24).   Almost a year ago a photograph of two figures standing on a rooftop of a building in Merrimack, New Hampshire, attracted interest in the social-media sphere attentive to the Palestine-Israel conflict. The people in the photograph were wearing masks and holding greenish smoky flares over their heads. Beneath them was a sign, “Elbit Systems of America.” That’s a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of the Israeli weapons company Elbit Systems. The parent, Haifa-based company is a leading supplier of weaponry — military drones, artillery, munitions and electronic warfare systems — that the Israeli military... -more-


“The ICJ finds that BDS is not merely a right, but an obligation
.” 
Editor.  mronline.org (8-17-24). 

The ICJ’s authoritative ruling on the Israeli occupation makes clear that boycotts, divestment, and sanctions against Israeli occupation, colonization, and apartheid are not only a moral imperative but also a legal obligation.
Originally publishedMondoweiss  on August 13, 2024 by Craig Mokhiber (more by Mondoweiss)  |  (Posted Aug 16, 2024)

Human Rights, Inequality, State Repression, WarAmericas, United StatesNewswireBDS, International Court of Justice (ICJ), Israeli Occupation, Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF)

Israel and its lobby have, for years now, been engaged in a frenzy of activity to further insulate Israel from accountability by using their influence in the West to effectively outlaw organized opposition to Israel. Foremost among these efforts has been the Israeli campaign to penalize calls to boycott, divest from, and sanction Israel for its gross violations of human rights. As a result, countless laws and policies are now on the books across the U.S. and the broader West, trampling on core constitutional principles and internationally guaranteed human rights in defense of Israeli impunity. But an advisory opinion issued last month by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) should help to turn that around.

In its historic ruling, the ICJ found that Israel’s occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza is entirely unlawful, that Israel practices apartheid and racial segregation, and that all states are under a duty to help bring this to an end, including by cutting off all economic, trade and investment relations with Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. In other words, as a matter of international law, all countries are obliged to participate in an economic boycott of Israel’s activities in the occupied Palestinian territory and to divest from any existing economic relations there. . . .

 


7.11.24 Veterans for Peace talk Boycott, Divest, and Sanction, the time is NOW

Dr. Javeria Farooqi joins us to talk BDS: its importance, its successes, its impact, and how YOU can take part in ending apartheid, occupation, and genocide. Dr. Farooqi shows us specifically the tools we can use to Boycott. From Apps to Websites, you can view products and stores to support or avoid. She also talks about how your investments can be powerful in changing the world for the better, for the humane, for the compassionate.

 

From: Friends of Sabeel North America <friends@fosna.org> A Christian Voice for Palestine
Date: Fri, May 24, 2024 at 5:09 PM
Subject: Some Observations and Reflections from Palestine
To: Mack Paul <mpaul49@gmail.com>

A black background with orange and blue text

Description automatically generated

 

 

Dear Mack,
Since returning to Palestine last week, I have been speaking with trusted individuals and extensively monitoring Hebrew broadcasts on TV and radio. I developed a number of observations about Palestinians and Israelis that are often missing in the Western Press:

1.     Palestinians in the West Bank and Israel have a deep sense of fear and foreboding. They were shocked at the intensity and brutality of the Israeli response to Hamas’ attack and the inability of the world community to respond adequately to what they clearly perceive as an ongoing genocide.

2.     Many are also surprised at how long the crisis is taking. They strongly fear that the end is nowhere in sight, and that if hostilities in Gaza were to cease or become significantly reduced then the West Bank would be next. The heightened level of Israeli settler and army violence as well as impunity is only the first step towards a more massive attack, with the possible aim of another large-scale population transfer–this time in the West Bank and towards Jordan.

3.     Israelis also are reacting as if in the midst of an existential battle, sensing the need (and perhaps the opportunity) to reach a final resolution of their dispute with the Palestinians, by means of a crushing and lasting victory and the implementation of an unclear plan to resolve matters in their favor once and for all. The sense one gets is that Israelis are living in a bubble, with no appreciation for the suffering of the Palestinians (which is rarely depicted in their media) or the opinions of the rest of the world (which they dismiss as antisemitism). There is only a determination to use massive power, out of a sense of superiority combined paradoxically with a feeling of vulnerability. There exists also a sense of entitlement and impunity clearly demanding that Israel be exempt from normal standards of behavior and that the world see things their way, and complaining of victimhood if the world (or anyone) fails to support their version of reality.

4.     There is very little interest in Israel any more to maintain the façade of democracy, liberality, freedom of speech, right of dissent, or judicial restraint. There exists a vengeful spirit and a feeling that the outrages of October 7 gives them the right to do anything they want. The anger at Netanyahu personally hides the fact that Gallant and Lapid do not really disagree with him at all on the overall handling of the Gaza issue or the Palestinians.

5.     In the West Bank there is real economic suffering, since tourism has virtually stopped as well as work permits for Israel. Last month, there was also a 50% reduction in salaries from the Palestinian Authority. At the same time, there is increased settler violence and an overall sense of foreboding as people are waiting for worse things to develop. Ultimately, there is a tremendous disappointment with the reactions of the Arab countries and of the Palestinian Authority, which is losing all credibility.

6.     Generally, there is a feeling that major things may happen soon, none of them at all good, yet there is a fierce determination for sumud and resilience.

These are merely some of my observations. While I am here, I will continue to listen and absorb what I see and hear.  

 

Sincerely, Jonathan Kuttab, Executive Director

Support FOSNA

 

Fwd: Aipac/Billionaires funneling money to defeat progressives+Universities & War industry

From Sunny San Juan.  Date: Fri, May 24, 2024 at 9:06 PM
Subject: Aipac/Billionaires funneling money to defeat progressives+Universities & War industry
SCROLL DOWN FOR DIVESTMENT 

From: The intercept, May 24, 2024

 A new report from The Intercept reveals the same donor that is funneling millions of dollars into an IDF battalion— one that even the U.S. was going to sanction for human rights violations — is funding the campaigns of George Latimer, Wesley Bell, and AIPAC.

AIPAC and its aligned dark-money Super PACs have made their intentions clear — they are coming after Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY-16) with everything they have to knock the pro-peace member of Congress out of his seat in his June 25th primary race. They’ve pledged to spend nearly $20 million between now and the primary election day, running opposition and smear ads against him. In just the last two weeks alone they’ve dropped nearly $6 million in the district with a hatchet job of ads smearing his record.

Republican Stephen Rosedale is the president of Friends of Nahal Haredi, the U.S. nonprofit that’s funneled millions of dollars to this battalion, which is notorious for human rights abuses including the death of a 78-year-old Palestinian American man in 2022.

Rosedale has given almost $100k to AIPAC’s super PAC and directly contributed to the campaigns of George Latimer and Wesley Bell

From: Canadian Foreign Policy Institute

This morning the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel must “immediately halt” its military offensive in Rafah. On Monday the chief prosecutor at the International Criminal Court announced he’d seek warrants for Israel’s PM and defence minister.

Yet from diplomatic cover to arm sales, a special envoy to deflect criticism of Israel to a colonial trade accord, Canada continues to enable the apartheid state’s genocidal violence. Canada’s largest single contribution to Palestinian dispossession is the huge amounts raised by registered charities for projects in Israel.   Since 1991 United Israel Appeal of Canada alone has raised over $1.5 billion. This week a detailed complaint was submitted to the Canada Revenue Agency asking it to investigate UIA, which has funded groups assisting the Israeli military and illegal settlements.  

 

 https://www.lifehackguru.com/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIgv3SmMenhgMVAq3RBB17twB4EAEYASAAEgIPqfD_BwE&campaignid=20786396384&adgroupid=154477300494&loc_physicall_ms=9003197&loc_interest_ms=&matchtype=&network=d&creative=696533636334&keyword=&placement=pulsetv.com&targetid=&cpid=d635c938-4e2d-4486-b08a-c2e958548638&lpid=b26a0cb9-ff4c-40a8-9803-808f0609662f&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIgv3SmMenhgMVAq3RBB17twB4EAEYASAAEgIPqfD_BwE

Tell Universities: Divest from the War Industry Now

https://actionnetwork.org/forms/tell-universities-divest?source=group-democracy-for-america-advocacy-fund&referrer=group-democracy-for-america-advocacy-fund&redirect=https://secure.actblue.com/donate/dfa_university_divest&link_id=4&can_id=ad24e547d395c0b0b86d877e0ff73f99&email_referrer=email_2331028&email_subject=why-are-universities-engaged-in-war-profiteering&refcodeEmailReferrer=email_2331028

 Demand University Divestment From Weapons Manufacturers And Defense Contractors Now.

Billions of dollars from university endowments are invested in the stocks of weapons manufacturers and defense contractors.  These corporations are directly responsible for untold human suffering around the globe with their bombs and missiles raining down on civilians from Gaza to Yemen.

 

Year after year weapons manufacturers successfully lobby Washington to greenlight more war and bloodshed. This is the industry that our universities are supporting with their investment dollars – an industry that profits from unthinkable violence against human beings.

 

And for what? For returns on an endowment portfolio? To add a few more dollars to an already massive university fund? No matter how they try to rationalize it, universities that invest in weapons companies have blood on their hands.

 

Divestment is only a first step toward building a world beyond war, but it's a powerful one because institutions of learning must lead in the pursuit of justice and human flourishing.

The American Association of University Professors says the efforts have become so widespread and heavy-handed that it amounts to a “new McCarthyism.”

But in the absence of any official, central database on the firings and suspensions of academic workers, hard data was hard to come by. So The Intercept went to work to uncover the facts.

What we’ve found so far are academics in fields as diverse as politics, sociology, Japanese literature, public health, Latin American and Caribbean studies, Middle East and African studies, mathematics, and education who were fired, suspended, or removed from the classroom for criticizing Israel — and this may be just the tip of the iceberg.

 

 

 

As Norway’s largest private pension fund, we are divesting from Caterpillar

There is no excuse to be silent over the role of companies linked to Israel’s illegal actions in the occupied Palestinian territory and its war in Gaza.

Kiran Aziz

Head of Responsible Investments, KLP

Published On 26 Jun 2024, https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/6/26/as-norways-largest-private-pension-fund-we-are-divesting-from-caterpillar

At Norway’s largest private pension fund, KLP, we have decided to divest from United States industrial group Caterpillar over concerns about its role in human rights abuses in occupied Palestine.

KLP has previously divested from companies linked to the illegal Israeli settlements and the separation wall in the West Bank following the important United Nations report on businesses linked to settlements.

Caterpillar’s D9 series bulldozers are imported to Israel by Israeli Tractors and Equipment (ITE), part of Zoko Enterprises. In partnership with the Israeli military’s Technology and Maintenance Corps, Zoko Enterprises has rebuilt these machines with vehicle-mounted weapons and armoured drivers’ cabins for use in the occupied Palestinian territory. The widely used Caterpillar D9R bulldozers weigh around 62 tonnes, are four metres tall and wide, and eight metres long.

The constant use of these weaponised bulldozers in the occupied Palestinian territory has led to a series of human rights warnings from United Nations agencies, and nongovernmental organisations over the last two decades about the company’s involvement in the demolition of Palestinian homes and infrastructure.

On June 20, UN human rights experts called on Caterpillar and weapons companies like BAE Systems to immediately stop the transfer of weapons and other military equipment to Israel as they may constitute serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian laws, risking complicity in international crimes, possibly including genocide. This demand is in line with recent calls from the Human Rights Council and the independent UN experts to states to cease sending military equipment to Israel even if executed under existing export licences.

Around 100 Caterpillar D9R bulldozers were reported to be used in Gaza at the beginning of the latest war, after October 7. In December 2023, the Israeli forces were accused of using bulldozers to bury alive civilians outside the Kamal Adwan Hospital in Beit Lahiya in Gaza following a nine-day siege. The NGO Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor has demanded an investigation into the allegations.

Throughout 2022 and 2023, there have been reports of Caterpillar bulldozers being used in the attacks on homes, refugee camps and infrastructure in the West Bank.

KLP considers that such use of bulldozers both paves the way for and worsens the human rights abuses taking place, since such use may be both effective and injurious to people. Even though Caterpillar does not sell equipment directly to the Israeli military, the company has been made aware of how its equipment is being used. This has also gone on for a long time and in a steadily worsening situation, without the company being able to demonstrate that it has performed enhanced due diligence assessments or made any real changes. The time aspect indicates that the company is unwilling to do very much.

On the basis of the information available, it is therefore impossible to assert that the company has implemented adequate measures to avoid becoming involved in future norm violations.

These extensive reports of violations come against the backdrop of a broad international consensus that West Bank settlements violate international law including the UN Charter on using force to acquire territory. An occupying power transferring its own civilian population into territory it occupies is a war crime under Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. The International Criminal Court also deems this a war crime.

When KLP has previously divested from Motorola, Israeli banks, construction and engineering, energy and communication companies linked to the illegal Israeli settlements and the illegal separation wall in the West Bank, we were vocal.

When we blacklisted companies producing controversial weapons globally such as Elbit, Rolls-Royce and Thales, and when we pulled out of Russian companies, and Adani over its role in Myanmar, we were also vocal. There is no excuse to be silent over the role of companies linked to Israel’s illegal actions in the occupied territory and its war in Gaza. Blacklisting Caterpillar and others linked to illegal settlements should become the norm for pension funds who claim to care about human rights.

 

Robert C. Koehler.  A World Under Spiritual Construction.” Common Wonders.  TRANSCEND Media Service.  TMS PEACE JOURNALISM.   15 May 2024. 
Recent announcement by Union Theological Seminary, affiliated with Columbia University, that it is divesting from “companies profiting from war in Palestine/Israel,” fully supporting the student encampments, and condemning arrests and police violence on the peaceful, culturally diverse protests. There’s something happening here . . .    Read more...

 

 

Palestine Action Target Two Companies At Once, Complicit In Israel’s Genocide  By The Canary.  PopularResistance.org (2-16-24).  Palestine Action targeted two companies complicit in Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza on Wednesday 14 February – shutting down one completely and shaming the other by painting it blood-red.  First, and the group “drenched” the Manchester offices of Bank of New York (BNY) Mellon in red paint, to symbolise the bank’s complicity in Palestinian bloodshed. Activists also sprayed a message calling for Elbit to be shut down: BNY Mellon invest over £10m in Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest weapons firm, Elbit Systems, which provides 85% of Israel’s military drone fleet and land based equipment, as well as missiles... -more-

 

From Guernica to Gaza

Editor.  mronline.org (

Pablo Picasso, Guernica, 1937.

Raouf Halaby: "To say that I was awed is an understatement."

 

 

 

From Guernica to Gaza

Originally published: Janata Weekly  on February 4, 2024 by Raouf Halaby (more by Janata Weekly)  |  (Posted Feb 13, 2024)

Culture, Media, Movements, WarEurope, France, Gaza, Middle East, SpainNewswireGuernica, Pablo Ruiz Picasso

| Pablo Picassos Guernica 1937 | MR Online

Pablo Picasso’s Guernica, 1937

To say that I was awed is an understatement.

Standing in front of Picasso’s 11.5 ft. x 25.5 ft. celebrated painting Guernica is one of the most sobering encounters I’ve had the displeasure of experiencing. Displeasure because the massive composition’s theme is revoltingly gruesome. Since that dastardly first-of-its-kind-waging-of-wars, nations have not learned to abide by and practice peaceful and harmonious existence.

World War 2 was followed by wars in Hiroshima/Nagasaki, Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, the Near East/Palestine (8 wars), Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Libya, Ukraine, Yemen, and Gaza, to name but a few. And in each of these wars massive bombings and aerial bombardment have been the weapon of choice, resulting in the death of millions of human beings.

Aerial bombardment is brutal, heinous, and vicious. Aerial bombardment is the cowardly weapon of arrogant, fascistic, hegemonic, and egotistical maniacs. Aerial bombardment is the screen behind which powerful thugs hide to absolve themselves of crimes against humanity. Aerial wars’ indiscriminate annihilation of mostly innocent civilians, reducing them to paupers and beggars, goes against every decent norm.

For well over 35 years I’d been showing Guernica to my students, expounding on the painting’s blending of a heinously ghoulish theme executed in the cubist style on a-never-seen-before massive scale. One of the world’s most prominent museums, Madrid’s Museo Reina Sofia, is finally home to this one-of-a-kind artistic expression bearing witness to ghastly human depravity.

On my last visit to Spain some 12 years back, I spent well over an hour studying Picasso’s ingenious blending of form and theme in monochromatic colors. Standing in front of the composition, I viewed it from every angle, and I relived years of lecture terms, phrases, descriptions, questions, answers, student responses/opinions, and so much more.

On April 27, 1937, mostly German and Italian warplanes conducted the first large-scale aerial bombardment on the town of Guernica. Nestled in northern Spain and with the complicity of Franscico Franco, Spain’s Fascist dictator, the Germans wanted to test their newly fabricated war machinery—the Nazi Luftwaffe’s planes and their newly designed bombs—produced solely for destruction on a massive scale. Because of its remoteness, Guernica was chosen as the perfect out-of-sight out-of-mind target.

Like today’s Gaza, Guernica was reduced to massive rubble shrouding innocent civilians whose flesh, blood, bones, and sinews cloaked the bleak landscape of rubble, rebar, and crater-size pocked apocalyptic destruction where once high-rise structures, streets, and alleyways existed. And hospitals, ambulances, mosques, churches, and schools are being targeted—deliberately and mercilessly.

In response to this nightmarish bombing, Picasso isolated himself in his studio for a lengthy time and vented his fury by working long hours and in isolation on what is perhaps the world’s foremost artistic political statement.

Here is what I see today in Picassos’ composition: to the far right is a Gaza woman holding her arms to high heaven; she is screaming, pleading, imploring the gods for deliverance. At the top is a light, accompanied by a hand holding a lamp as though to shed light on the unfolding carnage. Call this the 90 plus journalists killed by Israeli snipers and drones so as to draw a curtain on what God’s chosen are doing in Gaza, today’s “graveyard of children.” In addition to its military strength, Israel is adept at conducting its carnage under the cover of dark. And its powerful choking of U.S. media is adept at portraying it as the victim. To the top left Netanyahu and Co., along with Biden and Co., prance bullishly over the devastation as they squash the emaciated mother holding on to her dead infant. How many white shrouds have to be buried to appease the Hebraic God of revenge? And how many corpses have to be pulled out, with bare hands, from under the rubble? And how many tattered remains have to be placed in makeshift bags? Careful scrutiny of the foreground depicts newsprint, Picasso’s manner of telling the world “I am Guernica: Remember Me, Remember What Heinous Crimes You’ve committed.” And the crushed supine figure holding onto a broken weapon represents trampled, crushed justice under the weight of brute force.

It is worth noting that while Peter Paul Rubens, Pieter Bruegel the Elder, and scores of mostly European artists have produced a massive volume of compositions under the title Massacre of the Innocents, a theme associated with Herod (the Not so Great), King of Judea, and around the time of Christ’s birth, Picasso’s Guernica stands in a class of its own.

And is it not ironic that right around the time Christendom is about to celebrate the birth of its Savior, the Prince of Peace, the Redeemer, the Israelis are raining down 2000-pound bombs, some of them the awful phosphorus kind that vaporize their victims? To date the equivalent of three Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombs have been dropped on a starved, thirsty, disoriented 2.3 million displaced citizenry.

And could we say that to date, timed with Christmas 2023, Israel has massacred over 8,000 thousand innocent children—and counting. And the West, today’s bastion of Christianity, is abhorrently supportive and silent?

Yes, in the last few years Fascism has slowly sneaked into our halls of justice, our public spaces, our airwaves, and our digital formats. Joe “I am a Zionist to the Core,” Netanyahu’s puppet and apologist, has draped himself in the Israeli flag and has fashioned and emblazoned his tie, his shirt, his suit, and his rhetoric in the same style and rhetoric of Netanyahu, his alter ego and master.

On December 10, 2023, Spain, the only Western nation with the moral fortitude to express its outrage at the Gaza carnage, held a solidarity event in the Basque city of Guernica’s market square, the same square that was bombed by the Nazis and Fascist forces way back in 1937. An aerial view depicts a massive Palestinian flag (the size of the entire square) in mosaic form the tesserae of which were held by citizens, trade unionists, artists, anti-war and anti-fascist groups, along with a large depiction of Picasso’s image depicting the mother, her child in her arms, crying to the high heavens.

And for a whole minute the sirens blazed in solidarity with Gaza’s mothers and children.    Viva Espana. Viva Palestina.

Raouf J. Halaby is a Professor Emeritus of English and Art. He is a writer, photographer, sculptor, an avid gardener, and a peace activist. Courtesy: CounterPunch.


OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #214, JANUARY 29, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #214, JANUARY 29, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett

Doomsday Clock 89 Seconds to Midnight.
NUKEWATCH QUARTERLY (Winter 2024-25). 
New Corporate-Military-Congressional Warmaking Paradigm.
UN-USA, UN Today (Nov. 2024): what we can expect from Trump II. 

 

WHO’S WARNING US?    

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has made its annual Doomsday Clock announcement. It's now set at 89 seconds to midnight — the closest its ever been to catastrophe. Read the 2025 statement >    

For those who want to raise awareness around the announcement and help decrease existential threats, the Bulletin has also created a social media toolkit. Access the toolkit >

NUKEWATCH QUARTERLY (Winter 2024-25)

    This number contains 20 articles, eleven on nuclear power, nine on weapons
      Take action against the nuclear danger by subscribing to NQ for $25 by phoning 715-472-4185, and publicizing and distributing NQ.   I am one of the 48  bulk distributorshttps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif, join with me.

 

WHO MAKES THE WARS?
While reviewing files of venerable anti-war organizations, I found this insightful passage on war and corporations in a letter from the War Resisters League (April 2005). 

In the course of running the Merchants of Death campaign, WRL’s Anti-Militarism Program Task Force has made an amazing discovery, one that amounts to a profound shift in the ancient paradigm of warmaking.  For centuries…opportunists or all dimensions, from weapons makers to battlefield scavengers, seized on the military adventures of nations for profits large and small.  In the 21st century, however giant US corporations have reverse that pattern: today, instead of just making profits from opportune war, they have seized the war-making apparatus itself, so that they now make war for profit. . . . “  It’s another way of thinking about the military-industrial-congressional complex Eisenhower warned us about.    Corporations such as Bechtel, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Halliburton, are conscripted by the U.S. armed forces to achieve corporate domination of the whole process of profiteering for war: promoting wars, manufacturing the weapons, selling the weapons. 

WHO TRIES TO PREVENT AND STOP WARS?
UN-USA, UN TODAY NOVEMBER 2024

          Listen to Global Dispatch's new episode: What the Republican Election Sweep Means for the United Nations:    Tune in and hear Peter Yeo, Executive Vice President of the United Nations Foundation, explain the nuances of how Republicans have traditionally approached the United States' relationship to the United Nations, what we can expect from the second Trump Administration.

 

Listen Now

NUKEWATCH QUARTERLY (Winter 2024-25)

      Take action against the nuclear danger by subscribing to NQ for $25 by phoning 715-472-4185, and publicizing and distributing NQ.   

OMNI WORLD WAR III anthology #3 February 3, 2025

$
0
0

 

OMNI

WORLD WAR III anthology #3

February 3, 2025

COMPILED BY dICK BENNETT FOR A CULTURE OF PEACE, JUSTICE, AND ECOLOGY.

httpS://omnicenter.org/donate

What’s at Stake:  On January 24, 2023, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Doomsday Clock was moved to 90 seconds (1 minute, 30  seconds) before midnight, the closest it has ever been set to midnight since its inception in 1947. This adjustment was largely attributed to the risk of nuclear escalation that arose from the US/NATO/Ukraine vs. Russia War.  Only the threatening chaos of the climate emergency poses an equal or greater danger to our evolution.    Now “. . .The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists has officially reset the Clock to 89 seconds to midnight.[1] In the face of the climate crisis, nuclear war, and the potential misuse of biological science and artificial intelligence, humanity is the closest we’ve EVER been to the apocalypse.”  Closer than ever: It is now 89 seconds to midnight

 

Contents

Win Without War.  “The Doomsday Clock….”

Solomon Hughes.  “…Meet the U.S.’s Real Dr. Strangelove.”
A Sample of 3 from Google: 
   “Everything You Wanted to Know about World War III.”
   “Is the US Really Preparing for WWIII?”
   “The War of 2026.”
Long-Range NATO Missiles Threaten Global War.

Annie Jacobsen.  Nuclear War: A Scenario.
Paul Gilk.  “Picking Fights with the Gods.”
John B. Foster.  “Imperialism in the Indo-Pacific.”

Kathy Kelly.  “Afghanistan’s Rehabilitation Museum and Dr. Seuss’ The Butter Battle Book.”
Barnes and Sanger. US Nuclear Arsenal Expanding.

Eugene Doyle.  The Armavir Incident and WWIII.

John Zavales.  Congress Should Question Biden.

Ted Snider.  Rogue US v. World.

Yougov Poll.  Most US Public Expects War.

Tom Engelhardt.  “A Slow-Motion WWIII” (is scarcely reported).

David Bromwich Urges Peace Treaty.

Jeremy Kuzmarov.  “We’re at a 1914 Moment.”

Rev. Robert Moore. Diplomacy and De-Escalation Urgently Needed.

David Shearman.  World Preparing for WWIII while Climate Threatens All Life.

 

Contents WWIII #2 (14 essays)

 

 

 

 

 

TEXTS

 “The Doomsday Clock is ticking, Dick.”     The Win Without War Team.   Feb 2, 2025.

. . .The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists has officially reset the Clock to 89 seconds to midnight.[1] In the face of the climate crisis, nuclear war, and the potential misuse of biological science and artificial intelligence, humanity is the closest we’ve EVER been to the apocalypse.

The threats we face are coming from all directions. Trump has already left the Paris Agreement and World Health Organization, hamstringing our ability to respond to global threats like climate change and pandemics. There’s Russia’s continued military aggression in Ukraine, China’s rapid expansion of its armed forces and growing stockpile of nuclear weapons, and amidst fragile ceasefires in Gaza and Lebanon, violence continues to simmer in the Middle East.

Last year, Congress did its part to push us closer toward midnight by continuing to expand the already massive U.S. arsenal with unnecessary nuclear-armed submarines, more missiles, and new warheads.

It’s a huge reason why, leading scientists have declared our entire planet has inched even closer to nuclear armageddon than at any other time.

Closer than during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. 
Closer than the height of the Cold War in the 1980s.
Closer than at the start of the nuclear arms race in 1953.

Building more nuclear weapons has only deepened a global arms race that makes us all less safe. But if we join together, we can still turn back the clock.   Because it’s happened before: In 1991, after the United States and the Soviet Union signed the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and committed to scaling down their nuclear stockpiles, the Bulletin moved a full seven minutes backward.   Every second counts, and with the war lobby once again jumping to monetize crises and conflicts, working against peace to expand the U.S. war machine, Win Without War’s work at pausing the clock is more crucial than ever.   We’re pulling out all the stops to keep the pressure on Congress and push them away from reckless nuclear weapons spending increases that bring us closer to doomsday in 2025.   It won’t be easy, and that’s why we need you with us, Dick. As Trump unveils his ‘shock and awe’ plans to gut our government, there is no shortage of things to worry about, and avoiding apocalypse can’t be put on the back burner. Please donate $27 now and power our massive push to turn back the clock.

“89 seconds to midnight” is a stark reminder that governments pouring TRILLIONS of dollars into nuclear weapons over the years has done little to make the world safer.

Unfortunately — and despite every signal imaginable reminding us that this is one more moment where reducing nuclear stockpiles would’ve created pathways to peace, and with massive public support for disarmament — Congress could allow Trump to push us even closer toward doomsday. But not if we have anything to say about it.

Every second counts. Let's turn back the clock together.  Thank you for working for peace, The Win Without War team.  1. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, “Closer than ever: It is now 89 seconds to midnight

Solomon Hughes.  Sixty years after Kubrick’s film, meet the U.S.’s real Dr. Strangelove.”    Editor.  mronline.org (10-8-24).     

SOLOMON HUGHES looks at the sorry career of Brett McGurk.

Originally published: Morning Star Online  on October 4, 2024 by Solomon Hughes (more by Morning Star Online)  |  (Posted Oct 07, 2024).   Culture, Empire, Imperialism, StrategyAmericas, United StatesNewswireBrett McGurk, Dr. Strangelove, Henry Kissinger, Herman Kahn, Stanley Kubrick

STANLEY KUBRICK made Dr Strangelove sixty years ago.  This black comedy is old enough to be filmed in black and white, but remains a compelling film because the characters seem to recur in real life: like Strangelove himself, the sinister adviser who pushes a horrible, heartless plan of war and death on a hapless president. Or General Ripper, the macho military man who goes a bit “funny in the head.” And, of course, Group Captain Lionel Mandrake, representing the British, who flap about in a vague, posh way while being dragged along by U.S. military adventures.

It’s fairly common for U.S. presidents to have a “Strangelove” figure: many thought he was based on Henry Kissinger, who “Strangeloved” for successive presidents, although he was actually drawn from earlier characters including Cold War “intellectual” Herman Kahn.   President George “Dubya” Bush was so hapless that he had several “Strangelove” type figures to dream up the Iraq War, including Dick “shot his own best friend in the face” Cheney and Don “known unknowns” Rumsfeld.

Joe Biden has a kind of low-wattage Dr Strangelove figure, Brett McGurk, who helped persuade the president to back Israel’s invasion of Lebanon.  McGurk was just a lawyer who got into U.S. politics by being a judicial clerk. He has no direct military experience, but he became a military adviser to George “Dubya” Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump and now Biden, showing that the Strangelove-y military bureaucracy transcends supposed political divisions. Bombing foreigners is bipartisan in the States.   McGurk grew his career as a military bureaucrat via the Iraq war–that is to say he climbed a ladder of disasters, although it was Iraqis who suffered while he raised himself higher.  McGurk was a legal adviser to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq from 2004 on. The Coalition Provisional Authority was the colonial-style administration the U.S. imposed on Iraqis after “liberating” them from Saddam.   The “laws” McGurk advised on were frankly disgusting, like “Coalition Provisional Authority Order 17” which exempted all the U.S. and British mercenaries from any Iraqi laws, so they could kill without consequence.   Other laws gave the Authority a huge sum of Iraqi cash, known as the Development Fund for Iraq, or pushed privatisation so Western contractors could come and take over Iraqi services. These laws helped U.S. firms squeeze vast sums out of Iraq, while leaving the “liberated” population powerless.  McGurk then drafted Iraq’s “interim constitution” which used a “divide and rule” tactic of institutionalising sectarian Shia-Sunni splits into Iraqi politics. This exacerbated a violent civil war, leading to many deaths, but the U.S. thought this a price worth paying: As long as Iraqis didn’t unite against the U.S. occupier, they were happy.   McGurk was then one of the advisers behind [Obama’s] 2007 “Surge,” one last attempt to flood Iraq with more U.S. troops to try control the multiple insurgencies faced by the occupation-backed government.  Many U.S. politicians patted themselves on the back claiming the Surge “stabilised” Iraq, but the continued attempt to shape Iraq with U.S. firepower rather than handing over actual power to Iraq’s own people just led to new, and more nihilistic reactions in the region, like Isis.

[SUMMARY] McGurk’s career was formed by the failures in Iraq, as the U.S. tried to impose its will on Iraq’s people. He was part of repeated attempts to shape the country by U.S. firepower in favour of U.S. corporations, leading to years of chaos and bloodshed.

So it is no surprise that as Biden’s “ National Security Council co-ordinator for the Middle East and North Africa,” he is backing Israel’s attempts to impose its will on the Palestinian, and now Lebanese, people using U.S.-supplied firepower.  I think understanding McGurk’s role will also help clear up a fairly common misunderstanding about the U.S. relationship with Israel.  McGurk’s general advice is that Biden should rely on “partnerships” in the Middle East, both with Israel and with authoritarian regimes including Saudi Arabia and Egypt: the U.S. is not always strong enough to permanently “project power” into the region–as the Iraq war ultimately showed.   So instead it must rely on local strong powers and “regional strong men.” Broadly speaking, the United States wants to press down their main regional challenger, Iran, and make sure the people of the “Arab Street” don’t give them a load of trouble.

So the U.S. does deals with, sells (or gives) arms to, and occasionally sends U.S. fighter planes to support, their “partners” in the region–which could be Saudi, or Egypt or Israel.   It is for this reason McGurk reportedly privately told Israel that the U.S. would support Israel’s missile attacks and invasion of Lebanon against Hezbollah targets: the U.S. is enthusiastic about Israel going to war with a group they see as a proxy for the U.S. regional enemy, Iran.

At the same time, McGurk has been promoting a “peace deal” for Gaza, where Israel joins up with the Saudis to impose a peace on the Palestinians, one where the war ends and the Palestinians get a sort of well-funded “reconstruction” but settle for a subordinate territory under heavy Saudi-Israeli influence.   The former, the war in Lebanon, is happening. The latter might be a bit of a U.S. pipe dream.   But what this does show is the U.S. is genuinely enthusiastic about Israel fighting their joint enemies–“Iran and Iranian proxies”–but is not super happy about Israel killing loads of Palestinians; although they can definitely put up with it, or might even cynically hope the IDF “gets it done sooner rather than later.”

Many on the left think Israel has lobbied and pushed the U.S. political system to the point where Israel has “captured” the U.S. And while this lobbying is real, the bigger truth is that the U.S. political establishment really sees Israel as a kind of “regional strongman,” a cat’s paw they can rely on to fight their perceived enemies.

[SUMMARY US PRIMARY POWER]  The deal is that the U.S. arms Israel to do the US’s bidding, rather than because the U.S. is doing Israel’s bidding.   https://mronline.org/2024/10/07/sixty-years-after-kubricks-film-meet-the-u-s-s-real-dr-strangelove/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=sixty-years-after-kubricks-film-meet-the-u-s-s-real-dr-strangelove&mc_cid=66ba87c57b&mc_eid=ab2f7bf95e

Everything You Wanted to Know About World War III but ...

The American Prospect     Https://prospect.org › world › 2024-09-18-everything-y...   

Sep 18, 2024 — America is going to spend a trillion dollars over the next 20 years building new missile silos and new nuclear weapons. The DOD is in the ...
Is the US really preparing for World War III?

Youtube · Sandboxx   Let's address a question we get asked just about every week: Is the U.S. fielding all these new aircraft, weapon systems, and other Defense ...
The War of 2026: Phase III Scenario | Proceedings

U.S. Naval Institute  Https://www.usni.org › proceedings › december › war-2...

The War of 2026 scenario outlined here provides a point of departure for broadened thinking about the naval aspects of a future great power war. 

[For sober reading, google World War III (3).  –D]


“Plan to use long-range NATO missiles against Russia threatens uncontrolled escalation of global war
.”

Editor.  Mronline.org (9-29-24).

After high-ranking NATO officials publicly called for Ukraine to use NATO weapons to attack deep inside Russia, Russian President Vladimir Putin formally presented a proposed update to Russia’s nuclear policy that would expand the conditions under which Moscow would use nuclear weapons.

Originally published: World Socialist Web Site (WSWS)  on September 26, 2024 by Statement of the WSWS Editorial Board (more by World Socialist Web Site (WSWS))  |  (Posted Sep 28, 2024).  Strategy, WarAmericas, Europe, Russia, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United StatesNewswire

Speaking before a meeting of the Russian Security Council on Wednesday, Putin declared: aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear-weapon state, but with the participation or support of a nuclear-weapon state, should be considered as a joint attack on the Russian Federation.   He added, We reserve the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Russia and Belarus.

This is the most blunt and concrete threat to date by Putin to use Russia’s nuclear arsenal, one of the two largest in the world, to respond to ongoing and ever- expanding strikes by Ukraine, with the backing of the NATO powers, on Russian cities and infrastructure.

Earlier this month, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Kiev, where he heavily implied that the US would move forward with the plan to allow Ukraine to use long-range NATO weapons against Russia. “We have adjusted and adapted as needs have changed, as the battlefield has changed,” he said in response to questions about the plan. . . .

 

The Chilling Truth About Nuclear War
The riveting, minute-by-minute account of our future, from nuclear launch to nuclear winter.   THE INSTANT NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER

Annie Jacobsen.  Nuclear War: A Scenario.

In only one scenario could the world as we know it end in a matter of hours: nuclear war. And one of the triggers for that war would be a nuclear missile inbound towards the United States.

Every generation, a journalist has looked deep into the heart of the nuclear military establishment: the technologies, the safeguards, the plans, and the risks. These projects are vital to how we understand the world we really live in: where one nuclear missile begets one in return; where the choreography of the world’s end requires massive decisions made on seconds-notice, with information that is only as good as the intelligence we have.    Annie Jacobsen’s Nuclear War: A Scenario explores this ticking clock scenario, based on dozens of new interviews with military and civilian experts who have built the weapons; created the response plans; and been responsible for those decisions should they need to have been made.

Nuclear War: A Scenario Book Club.  Aug 5, 2024.  [This opportunity has passed, but its inspiration continues.–D]

Dialogue and education are critical to preventing nuclear war and shaping policies that will reduce nuclear risks. Do you have civic-minded friends, family members, or co-workers who like to read, learn, and discuss?

This August and September, Back from the Brink (bftb) and Dutton Publishing invite individuals and communities to come together and take part in a national reading and community-based dialogue about Annie Jacobsen’s book, Nuclear War: A Scenario, U.S. nuclear weapons and policies, and ways to make a difference.

ABOUT THE BOOK

Published in March 2024, Nuclear War: A Scenario by investigative journalist Annie Jacobsen, is a harrowing, non-fiction account that examines the origins of U.S. nuclear war fighting strategy and one plausible scenario and timeline for how a catastrophic nuclear war could unfold based on current policies.

Based on interviews with scores of experts and former military and nuclear planning officials, the New York Times bestselling book offers an opportunity for civic-minded, concerned individuals to read and learn more and engage in important, non-partisan dialogue about U.S. nuclear weapons and policies.

 

Picking Fights with the Gods:  A Spiritual Psychoanalysis of Civilization’s Superegoby Paul Gilk.   Wipf and Stock, 2016.

Description  Contributors   Praise

The common understanding of "apocalypse" suggests End Times, Armageddon, and the end of the world. But the Greek word apokalypsis means none of these things. What it does mean is uncovering, disclosing, and revelatory. That "apocalypse" is so widely misunderstood as predestined disaster isn't due to natural evolution in meaning. To penetrate the misuse of apokalypsis is to discover mythic misrepresentation. That is, "apocalypse" doesn't generate End Times but--just the opposite--End Times compels apokalypsis. The actual threat of End Times--explicitly so with weapons of mass destruction and Anthropocene climate change--forces thoughtful people into a search for fundamental causes: Where do these destructive energies originate? Why are we so reluctant to recognize the obvious consequences and resistant to embrace available remedies? Why do we persist in denial and indifference? In these essays, Paul Gilk explores the underlying cultural and religious conventions (both "conservative" and "liberal") that constitute our resistance and refusal. To disclose and uncover those conventions, to dissolve our oblivion, is to awaken to apokalypsis and to realize the depth of our captivity within prevailing mythology, both religious and civilizational. If End Times is the disease, apokalypsis is the cure.

 

John Bellamy Foster.  Imperialism in the Indo-Pacific—An Introduction.”  The Monthly Review (July 1, July-August, 2024).

A map of asia with countries/regions

Description automatically generated

John Bellamy Foster and Brett Clark introduce this summer’s special issue on “Imperialism in the Indo-Pacific,” exploring how the super-region came to be conceptualized among geopolitical strategists and its present-day role in U.S military strategy. “The United States,” they write, “facing the demise of its global hegemonic imperialism, is not only preparing for a Third World War; it is actively provoking it.” | more…

 

Kathy Kelly.  “Museum of Unnatural History.”  The Catholic Worker (August-September 2012).  A distinctive meditation on Kabul, Afghanistan’s Organization for Mine Clearance and Afghan Rehabilitation Museum (OMAR) and Dr. Seuss’ The Butter Battle Book.  The Museum contains ordnance and land mines used in Afghanistan over four decades of warfare and photographs of maimed people.  The Butter Battle Book is a parable of the Cold War and its fragile, dangerous nuclear stalemate, with only MAD “holding off attempts by either side to exterminate the other” in WWIII.   “…in many ways World War III is starting, is already under way.”    Kelly’s indefatigable, practical work for peace around the world combined with her thoughtful writings on war and peace like this essay will surely eventuate in her being named a saint by the Catholic Church.  –Dick   https://thecatholicnewsarchive.org/?A=d&d=CW20120801-01.1.4&

 

[Here’s a sample of this saint’s encompassing mind: ] “And it's a cliché, but in many ways World War III is starting, is already underway. It's happening now. The crises in climate stability and global health that international cooperation might have delayed or prevented - incurable TB appearing as predicted in the slums of India, uncontainable in the absence of anything resembling a healthcare system and destined for worldwide spread; global warming data exceeding our former worst-case scenarios. These were crises we ignored in order to fight our butter battle. And our resource wars brought us the chain of escalating economic detonations that seems far from over.

 

And what wars, what cycles of violence and despair and with what weapons used, will follow the next economic tragedy, engulfing a world already poverty-maddened past the point of desperation?

 

It's too late for a children's book to teach us truths we should have learned back when we were children, and the grim lesson of the weapons in the museum, for many, were they to visit, would be the nonsense-lesson of the savagery of all the other nations whose weapons are on exhibit. The walls seem to have gotten so much higher since the last time we were drawn to look over them and decide, with a clear mind and searching conscience, how many children we're actually willing to kill.”

JU­LIAN E. BARNES AND DAVID E. SANGER.   US nuclear arsenal on course to expand.   Arkansas Democrat-Gazette.   Jun 09, 2024.   Read more...    Forwarded by Pat Snyder.

PROVOKING NUCLEAR WAR

Are you ready for WWIII?  (The Armavir Incident).

Editor.  Mronline.org (6-9-24)

The Armavir Incident–the destruction on 23 May of a key part of Russia’s nuclear defence–means the Doomsday clock is ticking closer to midnight.

Originally published: Pearls and Irritations  on June 7, 2024 by Eugene Doyle (more by Pearls and Irritations) (Posted Jun 08, 2024).   WarAmericas, Europe, Russia, Ukraine, United StatesNewswire.

. . .Most people don’t even know that a long-distance Ukrainian/NATO drone attack on the Armavir radar station north of Georgia knocked out a Voronezh-DM radar which is designed to detect incoming intercontinental ballistic missiles from as far as 6,000 kilometres away. It is one of three similar attacks in recent weeks.

The strike, trumpeted by Newsweek as a great success, may have robbed the Russians of a couple of minutes of warning time, in the event of a strike coming up from the south.

“Map Shows Ukraine’s Record-Breaking Hits on Russian Nuclear Warning Sites” Newsweek reports. The article, triumphalist in tone, fails to address the central issue: how crazy do you have to be to compress Russia’s decision-making window before it must decide whether to launch nuclear weapons at you? And who thought this was a good idea at the very time that nuclear-capable F16s are about to arrive in Ukraine and the U.S., along with a clutch of client states, has announced their missiles will strike mainland Russia in the coming days or weeks? Never in history has a nuclear power been attacked in this way. Even at the height of the Cold War neither side was brainless enough to do what the Western countries are doing now: attack detection facilities and launch missile strikes on a nuclear power.

We actually need the Russians to have really good missile detection systems; it keeps us safe. . . .

 

John Zavales.  “Congress Needs Answers before sending more aid to Ukraine.”  American Committee for US-Russia Accord.  April 8, 2024.
The Biden administration needs to tell the American people what it really thinks Kiev can actually achieve.    
Read in browser »

 

At the UN it is a rogue U.S. against the rest of the world.”    ditor.  Mronline.org (3-31-24). 

Ted Snider asks: "Is America a Rogue Superpower?"

Originally publishedMoon of Alabama  on March 28. 2024 by B (more by Moon of Alabama) (Posted Mar 30, 2024).   EmpireAmericas, United StatesNewswire
Ted Snider asks:   Is America a Rogue Superpower?   “Unipolar” used to mean that the United States was, at least in theory, alone in leading the world. Now “unipolar” means that the United States is alone and isolated in opposition to the world.   Snider refers to the recent UN Security Council resolution 2728 which “demands” a ceasefire in Gaza and “demands” a release of hostages and “demands” the unhindered supply of food and other items to Gaza.

The U.S. has claimedfalsely, that the resolution is not binding. . . .

Yougov Poll: Most Americans think there will be another world war within the next decade.  American Committee for US-Russia Accord.   April 9, 2024.
A new yougov survey asked Americans about the possibility of another world war, the role that other countries might play, the roles they themselves might play, and how the U.S. should respond to hypothetical nuclear attacks abroad and at home. The majority of Americans believe that another world war is at least somewhat likely to […]
Read in browser »

 

 

Most Americans believe U.S. will be in world war within next decade.     Editor.  Mronline.org (3-31-24).

WW3

A growing divide in the world economy is further adding to global tensions. A rising number of countries, including Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Syria, Yemen, and Zimbabwe, face significant U.S. sanctions. Economic warfare has led to a growing number of countries forming blocs outside of Washington’s control.

Originally published: Defend Democracy Press  on March 24, 2024 by Kyle Anzalone (more by Defend Democracy Press)  |  (Posted Mar 30, 2024)

WarAmericas, Asia, China, Europe, Global, Middle East, North Korea, Russia, United StatesNewswireWorld War, World War 3

. . . The majority of Americans believe it is likely that the U.S. will be involved in a world war during the coming decade. Under President Joe Biden, the U.S. is preparing for great power wars with Russia and China, engaged in multiple Middle East conflicts, and posturing for a confrontation with Iran and North Korea.

According to a new YouGov poll, 61% of Americans responded that it is very or somewhat likely that a world war would break out in the next five to ten years. About two-thirds of people responding to the poll said they believe the war will turn into a nuclear conflict.

When asked what countries would be aligned against the U.S., a majority of Americans said that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, Russia, and China. Americans identified NATO members such as France and the UK, as well as Israel and Ukraine, as allies in the coming world war.

Americans are not overly optimistic about the potential conflict. A slight majority believe the U.S. and its allies would defeat Russia. While under half of respondents said the U.S. would lose a war with Russia or against an alliance between Moscow and Beijing.

While most Americans believe a global conflict is on the horizon, they are not interested in fighting the war. More than twice as many respondents said they would refuse service even if drafted than stated, they would volunteer if the war broke out. Americans responded that they were more likely to serve in non-combat roles or if the homeland was threatened.    [=widespread ignorance of nuclear war!]

The survey was conducted as President Biden embroiled the U.S. in multiple conflicts. . . . 

 

CEASELESS WEAPONS WARS AND CLIMATE WAR FOR STARTERS, PLUS ECONOMIC WARS, PANDEMICS, AI,  

A Slow-Motion World War III?BY TOM ENGELHARDT. tomdispatch.  MARCH 27, 2024.   Facebooktwitterredditemail

I’ve been describing this world of ours, such as it is, for almost 23 years at tomdispatch. I’ve written my way through three-and-a-half presidencies — god save us, it could be four in November! I’ve viewed from a grave (and I mean that word!) Distance America’s endlessly disastrous wars of this century. I’ve watched the latest military budget hit almost $900 billion, undoubtedly on its way toward a cool trillion in the years to come, while years ago the whole “national security” budget (though “insecurity” would be a better word) soared to well over the trillion-dollar mark.

I’ve lived my whole life in an imperial power. Once, in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, it was even “the lone superpower,” the last great power on planet Earth, or so its leaders believed. I then watched how, in a world without great-power dangers, it continued to invest ever more of our tax dollars in our military. A “peace dividend“? Who needed that? And yet, in the decades that followed, by far the most expensive military on planet Earth couldn’t manage to win a single war, no less its Global War on Terror. In fact, in this century, while fighting vain or losing conflicts across significant parts of the planet, it slowly but all too obviously began to go down the tubes, or perhaps I mean (if you don’t mind a few mixed metaphors) come apart at the seams?

And it never seems to end, does it? Imagine that 32 years after the U.S. became the last superpower on Planet Earth, in a devastating kind of political chaos, this country might indeed reelect a man who imagines himself running a future American “dictatorship” — his very word for it! — even if, publicly at least, just for a single day.

And yes, in 2024, as chaos blooms on the American political scene, the world itself continues to be remarkably at war — think of “war,” in fact, as humanity’s middle name — in both Ukraine and Gaza (with offshoots in Lebanon and Yemen). Meanwhile, this country’s now 22-year-old war on terror straggles on in its own devastating fashion, with threats of worse to come in plain sight.

After all, 88 years after two atomic bombs were dropped on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II, nukes seem to be making a comeback (not that they were ever truly gone, of course). Thank you, Kim and Vlad! I’m thinking of how North Korean leader Kim Jong-un implicitly threatened to nuke his nonnuclear southern neighbor recently. But also, far more significantly how, in his own version of a State of the Union address to his people, Russian President Vladimir Putin very publicly threatened to employ nukes from his country’s vast arsenal (assumedly “tactical” ones, some of which are more powerful than the atomic bombs that ended World War II), should any European countries — think France — send their troops into Ukraine.

And don’t forget that, amid all of this, my own country’s military, eternally hiking its “defense” budget, continues to prepare in a big-time fashion for a future war with — yes — China! Of course, that country is, in turn, rushing to upgrade its own nuclear arsenal and the rest of its military machine as well. Only recently, for instance, the U.S. and Japan held joint military maneuvers that, as they openly indicated for the first time, were aimed at preparing for just such a future conflict with China and you can’t get much more obvious than that.

Another World War?

Oh, and when it comes to war, I haven’t even mentioned, for instance, the devastating civil war in Sudan that has nothing to do with any of the major powers. Yes, we humans just can’t seem to stop making war while, to the tune of untold trillions of dollars globally, preparing for ever more of it. And the truly strange thing is this: it seems to matter not at all that the very world on which humanity has done so forever and a day is now itself being unsettled in a devastating way that no military of any sort, armed in any fashion, will ever be able to deal with.

Let’s admit it: we humans have always had a deep urge to make war. Of course, logically speaking, we shouldn’t continue to do so, and not just for all the obvious reasons but because we’re on a planet that can’t take it anymore. (Yes, making war or simply preparing for it means putting staggering amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and so, quite literally, making war on the planet itself.) But — as both history and the present moment seem to indicate all too decisively — we just can’t stop ourselves.

In the process, while hardly noticing, it seems as if we’ve become ever more intent on conducting a global war on this planet itself. Our weapons in that war — and in their own long-term fashion, they’re likely to prove no less devastating than nuclear arms — have been fossil fuels. I’m thinking, of course, of coal, oil, and natural gas and the greenhouse gases that drilling for them and the use of them emit in staggering quantities even in what passes for peacetime.

In the previous century, of course, there were two devastating “world” wars, World War I and World War II. They were global events that, in total, killed more than a hundred million of us and devastated parts of the planet. But here’s the truly strange thing: while local and regional wars continue in this century in a striking fashion, few consider the way we’re loading the atmosphere with carbon dioxide and methane while, in the process, heating this planet disastrously as a new kind of world war. Think of climate change, in fact, as a kind of slow-motion World War III. After all, it couldn’t be more global or, in the end, more destructive than a world war of the worst sort.

And unlike the present wars in Gaza and Ukraine, which, even thousands of miles away, continue to be headline-making events, the war on this planet normally gets surprisingly little attention in much of the media. In fact, in 2023, a year that set striking global heat records month by month from June to December and was also the hottest year ever recorded, the major TV news programs of ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox actually cut their coverage of global warming significantly, according to Media Matters for America.

If I Don’t Get Elected, It’s Going to Be a Blood Bath”

I live in New York City which, like much of the rest of the planet, set a heat record for 2023. In addition, the winter we just passed through was a record one for warmth. And I began writing this piece on a set of days in early March when the temperature in my city also hit records in the mid-60s, and when, on March 14th (not April 14th, May 14th, or even June 14th), it clocked 70-plus degrees. I was walking outside that afternoon with my shirtsleeves rolled up, my sweater in my backpack, and my spring jacket tied around my waist, feeling uncomfortably hot in my blue jeans even on the shadier side of the street.

And yes, if, as my wife and I did recently, you were to walk down to the park near where we live, you’d see that the daffodils are already blooming wildly as are other flowers, while the first trees are budding, including a fantastic all-purple one that’s burst out fully, all of this in a fashion that might once have seemed normal sometime in April. And yes, some of what I’m describing is certainly quite beautiful in the short run, but under it lies an increasingly grim reality when it comes to extreme (and extremely hot) weather.

While I was working on this piece, the largest Texas fires ever (yes, ever!), continued to burn, evidently barely contained, with far more than a million acres of that state’s panhandle already fried to a crisp. Oh, and those record-setting Canadian forest fires that scorched tens of millions of acres of that country, while turning distant U.S. cities like New York into smoke hells last June have, it turns out, festered underground all winter as “zombie fires.” And they may burst out again in an even more devastating fashion this spring or summer. In fact, in 2023, from Hawaii to Chile to Europe, there were record wildfires of all sorts on our increasingly over-heated planet. And far worse is yet to come, something you could undoubtedly say as well about more intense flooding, more violent storms, and so on.

We are, in other words, increasingly on a different planet, though you would hardly know it amid the madness of our moment. I mean, imagine this: Russia, whose leader, Vladimir Putin, clearly doesn’t consider climate change a significant issue, is on pace to achieve an oil-drilling record for the second year in a row. China, despite installing far more green power than any other country, has also been using more coal than all other nations combined, and set global records for building new coal-fired power plants.

Meanwhile, the third “great” power on this planet, despite having a president dedicated to doing something about climate change, is still the largest exporter of natural gas around and continues to produce oil at a distinctly record pace.

And don’t forget the five giant fossil-fuel companies, BP, Shell, Chevron, exxonmobil, and totalenergies, which in 2023 produced oil, made profits, and rewarded shareholders at — yes, you guessed it! — a record pace, while the major petrostates of our world are still, according to the Guardian, “planning expansions that would blow the planet’s carbon budget twice over.”

In sum, then, this world of ours only grows more dangerous by the year. And I haven’t even mentioned artificial intelligence, have I? As Michael Klare has written in an analysis for the Arms Control Association, the dangers of AI and other emerging military technologies are likely to “expand into the nuclear realm by running up the escalation ladder or by blurring the distinction between a conventional and nuclear attack.”

In other words, human war-making could become both more inhuman and worse at the same time. Now, add just one more factor into the global equation. America’s European and Asian allies see U.S. leadership, dominant since 1945, experiencing a potentially epoch-ending, terminal failure, as the global Pax Americana (that had all too little to do with “peace”) is crumbling — or do I mean overheating?

What they see, in fact, is two elderly men locked in an ever more destructive, inward-looking electoral knife fight, with one of them warning ominously that “if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a blood bath… for the country.” And if he isn’t victorious, here’s his further prediction: “I don’t think you’re going to have another election, or certainly not an election that’s meaningful.” Of course, were he to be victorious the same could be true, especially since he’s promised from his first day in office to “drill, drill, drill,” which, at this point in our history, is, by definition, to declare war on this planet!

Unfortunately, Donald Trump isn’t alone. All too sadly, we humans clearly have trouble focusing on the world we actually inhabit. We’d prefer to fight wars instead. Consider that the definition not just of imperial decline, but of decline period in the age of climate change.

And yet, it’s barely news.

This piece first appeared at tomdispatch.

Tom Engelhardt is a co-founder of the American Empire Project and the author of The United States of Fear as well as a history of the Cold War, The End of Victory Culture. He is a fellow of the Nation Institute and runs tomdispatch.com. His latest book is Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World.

 

STOP THE WAR

David Bromwich.  “Against World War III.”  The Nation (May 16-23,        2022).  An early appeal to stop the war.   Pres. Kennedy turned back from nuclear annihilation.  Pres. Biden, Congress, and the established press are driving us toward it through an allegory of good vs. Evil.  Browmwich gives three-points for peace treaty. This is one of the best brief essays against warmongering I have read. MOREhttps://www.thenation.com/article/world/ukraine-us-nuclear-war/

STOP PROVOKING WAR

Former Virginia State Senator and Purple Heart Winner Warns: ‘We’re at a 1914 Moment’”By Jeremy Kuzmarov on May 27, 2022.

Says sinking of Russian warship by Ukraine with aid of U.S. intelligence is tantamount to an act of war

Colonel Richard Black has been one of the few former high-ranking military officers or government officials to speak out against U.S. military intervention in places like Syria and Ukraine. He is extremely concerned about the prospects of nuclear war breaking out and appalled at the callousness in which some government officials talk about a nuclear first strike.  In a May 17 interview with CAM, transcribed in the article, Colonel Black emphasized the grave danger associated with Ukraine’s sinking of the Moskva, Russia’s flagship Black Sea missile cruiser, with assistance from U.S. intelligence. According to Black, this act was tantamount to an act of war. He warns that we’re now “at a 1914 moment [year when World War I broke out].” […]

The post Former Virginia State Senator and Purple Heart Winner Warns: ‘We’re at a 1914 Moment” appeared first on covertaction Magazine.

Read in browser »

 

DIPLOMACY, DE-eSCALATION

“Nuclear Saber Rattling & Escalation Increase--Help CFPA ‘Sound the Alarm’ to De-escalate!”  2024.

Coalition for Peace Action <cfpa@peacecoalition.org> 

THE COALITION FOR PEACE ACTION (CFPA).  * 40 Years of Peacemaking *
www.peacecoalition.org  
Dear friend, 

 I'm following up on my April 18 E-alert about the growing danger of nuclear war in UkraineRecently, Russia's Foreign Minister said the danger is "serious, and should not be underestimated."

 

On top of all this, today's NY Times has this article about North Korea rattling the nuclear saber. In fact, the US, Russia, China, India, and Pakistan are all escalating their nuclear arsenals which has the world teetering toward a new nuclear arms race. The saber rattling and the escalation greatly increase the chances of nuclear war, which some are  calling World War III.

 

CFPA initiated a Diplomacy, Not War Campaign in 2013 in support of the Iran Nuclear Agreement, which kept Iran from getting nuclear weapon capability. We have been partnering this spring with sister groups to intensively lobbying for re-entering that agreement from which President Trump withdrew in 2018.

 

I believe the only viable way out of this cycle of nuclear saber rattling and escalation is to have a surge of Nuclear De-Escalation Diplomacy. This would include de-escalation initiatives, such as those I advocate in my op-ed on De-Escalate NOW to Prevent Nuclear War in Ukraine that was published on April 9 on NJ.com, and subsequently ran in The Star Ledger, New Jersey's largest newspaper. Click here or below to support CFPA's Nuclear De-escalation Organizing!

 

 De-escalation initiatives have been effective in the history of the nuclear weapons era. President Kennedy proposed a US-Soviet Atmospheric Nuclear Test Ban in 1963, and within 50 days the Treaty was concluded. In response to massive pressure from the Nuclear Freeze Campaign, President Reagan re-entered negotiations with the USSR in 1983 and that led in 1986 to the first nuclear reduction treaty in history, banning all medium range nuclear weapons.

 

Former Soviet premiere Gorbachev initiated a Nuclear Testing Moratorium on underground tests in the mid-1980s which led to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Former President George H.W. Bush  reduced US nuclear weapons more than any other US President, and it led to the first Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). We urgently need to call on our elected officials at all levels to take such bold de-escalation steps again!

 

We need your help to intensify our organizing in the face of the dire existential threats above! We have begun raising these proposals to our elected officials, and to sister anti-nuclear groups, but need your help to build on our efforts to date and do more! 

 

I urge you to click here or below to support CFPA's intensified organizing with as generous a contribution as possible. If you haven't yet contributed your 2022 annual CFPA membership, this would be a critical time to do so. This would also make you eligible to attend CFPA's Annual Membership Gathering keynoted by Rep. Tom Malinowski.

 

If you can upgrade from one time membership to monthly/quarterly pledger, it's a critical time to do so NOW. If you haven't  yet made your annual donation, do so now to help us meet the urgent challenges above!

P.S. Click to see a video and other information on The Ecology of War webinar CFPA co-sponsored on April 24, which many attendees have raved about!

Sincerely, 
The Rev. Robert Moore 
Executive Director,
Coalition for Peace Action &
Peace Action Education Fund
40 Witherspoon Street, Princeton, NJ 08542

 

World War III and our failure to defend against climate.”   Editor.  Mronline.org (6-14-24).

In World War III the enemy is not an array of tanks, shells and soldiers, but a collection of beliefs damaging to the earth’s future. The enemies are the minds and actions of those with the cult of neo-liberalism and greed acting through the power of huge industries, the enemy within.

 

Originally publishedPearls and Irritations  on June 11, 2024 by David Shearman (more by Pearls and Irritations) (Posted Jun 12, 2024)

WarGlobalNewswireWWIII.    

. . .Today conflict around the world is increasing and deprivation caused by flood, fire, drought and extreme heat are contributory. Most climate scientists believe humanity will soon face demise if present climate change and environmental policies continue.

The dire warnings of hundreds of scientists and many economic organisations are largely ignored.

Recently Sir David King, Chair of the Global Climate Crisis Advisory Group wrote:  Global prosperity has historically emerged from fossil fuels. But the stranglehold of fossil fuel giants, generously subsidised by governments and financially backed by banks, places short-term profits over the planet’s survival. This entrenched dependency stymies efforts to transition to a sustainable future, despite the urgent need for change.

David King also stated a “4R planet” is now necessary. The 3 of the 4 R’s being reducing emissions; repairing ecosystems; and strengthening local and global resilience against inevitable climate impacts.

The fourth R is the removal of 10-20bn tonnes per annum of carbon dioxide to the end of the century commencing immediately; expensive and currently not possible to any degree.

Bloomberg New Energy Finance has abandoned the prospect of limiting global warming to 1.5°C and now says that if the world wants to avoid a 2.6°C hotter environment, fossil fuel use needs to peak and start declining from today.

As yet we don’t have the word(s) to collectively embrace our sphere of defence. At the minimum it includes actions to urgently reduce greenhouse emissions, stop environmental degradation and recognise the greatest health issue of our time, climate change.

Let us call them our three survival needs—which are indivisible

The recent Budget speech

The minds of the Treasurer and Government would surely be focussed on the cost of our defences in the recent annual Budget?

Everyone listens to the Treasurer’s budget speech to see what goodies they will get but did the budget suggest needed sacrifice in WWIII? Did the budget deliver education on the greatest security and health threat of our time and its funding needing now? What an opportunity missed.

Let us consider his 4000 word budget speech and determine how our three survival needs and their costs were handled.

Incredibly it fails to mention the billions of dollars spent subsidising new gas developments as a budget item.

The word climate is mentioned once under small business. . . .

 

 

CONTENTS WWIII, #2, 2016-2024, From Daniel Ellsberg to Jeffrey Sachs

Daniel Ellsberg.  The Doomsday Machine.

Dawn Stover.  “Facing Nuclear Reality. . . .”
Garrett Graff.  “…US Government’s Secret Plan[s] to Save Itself….”

John Pilger.  “A World War Has Begun” (is being planned).
Tom Dispatch.  Tomgram.  “Michael Klare.  On the Road to World War III?” 
Michael Klare.  “The New Global Tinderbox.”
Rick Wayman.  “Tell Your Senators to Oppose Trump’s War Cabinet.”
John Avery.  Nuclear Weapons: An Absolute Evil.
Tom Engelhardt.  “The Slow-Motion Equivalent of a Nuclear War?”

Jeremy Kuzmarov.   “Talk of War with China Is Total Insanity.”

Judith Ehrlich.  “Daniel Ellsberg: A Profound Voice against the Doomsday Machine.”

Elaine Scarry.  Thermonuclear Monarchy. Choice between Democracy and Doom.

Istvan Mészáros.  “Militarism and the Coming Wars.”
Jeffrey Sachs.  “One War Party v. Jill Stein and Green Party.”

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #215, FEBRUARY 5, 2025.

$
0
0

 

 

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #215, FEBRUARY 5, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett  

US Imperialism 
Abel Tomlinson 
Leila Sansour. The Racket.

Abel Tomlinson’s latest article on US imperialism has been published by Covert Action Magazine.  The basic fact that the United States is an empire is perhaps the most systematically taboo subject within mainstream American information systems and public discourse. U.S. imperialism is almost never discussed in depth, critically or intelligently, within corporate media or the educational system. It is never mentioned by candidates of the two dominant political parties, or brought up at presidential debates. It is rarely mentioned even within universities, outside of a few select courses or degree programs.   This deafening silence on this key subject is a form of unspoken Propaganda…. https://covertactionmagazine.com/2025/02/05/silent-propaganda-on-u-s-imperialism-breeds-confused-americans/?fbclid=IwY2xjawIQv_xleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHfc3tbX9LS8nSE7CoP9FNm4Xv54ThrNCUe489yuIb4gLXkmRS61njkuDTQ_aem_BtsKlPfOT5ZYVWOIRGZZZw
Jeremy Kuzmarov, Managing Editor   CovertAction Magazine, (918) 264-2490
Order and Review my latest book Warmonger: How Clinton's Malign Foreign Policy Launched the US Trajectory from Bush II to Biden.

 

Leila Sansour.  The Racket: A Chronicle of Chaos wrought by the U.S. empire around the globe.  Mronline.org (9-21-24).  Originally published: Middle East Eye  on September 18, 2024 by Leila Sansour(more by Middle East Eye)  |  (Posted Sep 20, 2024).   Empire, Globalization, Imperialism, StrategyAmericas, United StatesNewswireMatt Kennard

. . . beyond the theatre of “liberal values” and “development and democracy programmes”, emerges a simple nation with a lucid drive and an uncomplicated diet. You just have to observe it at close range.   Kennard was uniquely positioned to do precisely that through his work as an investigative journalist with the Financial Times covering the Pentagon, the White House, Wall Street and the City of London, among other areas.   Over a four-year period, he travelled with rare access across five continents, reporting from more than a dozen countries, including Bolivia, Mexico, Haiti, PalestineTunisia and post-Mubarak Egypt. Kennard speaks eloquently of the cultural “echo-system” that dominates newsrooms and ensures mainstream media’s unshakable deference to the status quo.

The Racket combines unparalleled access with the author’s immense frustrations, comprising a collection of observations and insights that he was unable to publish during his tenure at the Financial Times.

The book’s findings should not come as a surprise. The past few decades have seen the rising power and reach of multinational corporations, whose interests converge with hard military power and the overarching American political doctrine.   But the level of detail Kennard provides offers a desperately needed adjustment to this lens. Speculation about U.S. political meddling and coercive global economic development programmes is one thing; being able to see the mechanics of it all up close is another. . . .   MORE

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #216, February 3, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #216, February 3, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett

 

John Clarke.   “A Voice from Canada.”

Yale Climate Connections, Climate Crisis and Mental Health

 

 

“A VOICE FROM CANADA:  John Clarke, “Truth takes a side.”
The Climate Charade Continues.”Originally publishedCounterfire  on January 12, 2024 (more by Counterfire) and Canadian Dimension  on November 7, 2024 (more by Canadian Dimension) . Understanding and truth are our best weapons against an exploitative society based on lies.  With fossil-fuel interests now openly and repeatedly in charge of Cop summits, their failure of legitimacy must be confronted, argues John Clarke.
On the Edge of the ‘Climate Abyss’.”   Originally publishedCounterfire  on May 15, 2024 (more by Counterfire).  With scientists warning of imminent catastrophe, it is time to stop expecting our rulers to change course by persuasion; only militant anti-capitalism will work, argues John Clarke. 
Emissions increase as climate disaster intensifies.”   Originally published: Counterfire  on June 29, 2024 (more by Counterfire) .  CEOs state outright that profit must come first, even as this year’s deadly heat waves providing worrying evidence of the rising climate emergency, reports John Clarke.

CLIMATE CRISIS AND MENTAL HEALTH
This week on Yale Climate Connections,
January 17 - 23, 2025.

 

For young people around the world, climate change no longer seems a distant threat, but a present reality.  One recent study published in the peer-reviewed journal The Lancet PlanetaryHealth surveyed 10,000 young people in 10 countries. A staggering 59% were very or extremely worried about climate change, and the vast majority (84%) were at least moderately worried.  Those who have experienced climate-related disasters suffer even more mental stress: Nearly one-third of disaster-affected people may experience negative mental health outcomes such as post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, or depression. Children, in particular, are bearing a significant emotional burden.   Given these realities, it is imperative that we equip our children with the mental and emotional tools to navigate this changing world. Young people are suffering from climate anxiety. Here’s how to help.   Keep reading.


More from YCC'  This is a moment in time to name names': Writer Karin Kirk and your editors discuss oil and gas contributions to newly elected leaders. 
Book review: “Glacial” exposes the heroes and villains of U.S. climate policy .
How engineers are working to solve the renewable energy storage problem.
Reads to help you make sense of the climate-changed insurance market. 

 

END OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #216, February 3, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #217, February 10, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #217, February 10, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett


Trump’s Environmental Record
Inside Climate News Weekly
Fighting Back: Protecting the Commons
A History of the Struggle

 

A Glimpse of TRUMP’S ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD
“During his first term in office, Donald Trump worked to weaken the National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Endangered Species Act.  He fast-tracked the Dakota Access and Keystone XL pipelines.  He rolled back 85% of protected land in the Bears Ears Monument for drilling; and he destroyed Indigenous sacred sites and burial grounds, including Monument Hill in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument to construct his Mexico border wall. “(NOAAF)

 

A green and black sign

AI-generated content may be incorrect. 2-10-25

This number of Inside Climate News Weekly is packed with information regarding the Trump administration’s onslaught against the climate and environment.

 

 

 PROTECTING AND EXPANDING THE COMMONS 

Future Natures: On Seeing Commons Through Popular GenresBy David Bollier.  Popular Resistance.org 2-2-25).  In academic research about the commons, few scholars are as venturesome in their creative approaches than the scholars and researchers associated with the Centre for Future Natures, at the University of Sussex in England. Led by anthropologist and research fellow Amber Huff, Future Natures explores “ecologies of crisis, commons, and enclosures," but its chief output isn’t monographs and books. It’s an exuberant array of creative works in popular genres like comic books, zines, social media, videos, and podcasts.  -more-

 

Chelsea Henderson.  Glacial.    2025.   A History of the Struggle.
Review BY Michael Svoboda .  Glacial exposes the heroes and villains of U.S. climate policy.    Yale Climate Connections.    1-25-25.   Chelsea Henderson investigates 60 years of climate progress and setbacks.     https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2025/01/book-review-glacial-exposes-the-heroes-and-villains-of-u-s-climate-policy/?utm_source=Weekly+News+from+Yale+Climate+Connections&utm_campaign=5fbbc9681a-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2025_01_23_08_21&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-5fbbc9681a-59405044

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #216, FEBRUARY 12, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #216, FEBRUARY 12, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett  

Dick Bennett.  Annie Jacobsen’s new book Nuclear War: A Scenario.

 

NUCLEAR WEAPONS ABOLITION

    The best introduction to Annie Jacobsen’s Nuclear War: A Scenario (2024) is probably a book published 39 years ago--Dr. Helen Caldicott’s Missile Envy: The Arms Race and Nuclear War (rev. 1986).  Here is a key passage from Missile Envy:  “The logical consequence of the preparation for nuclear war is nuclear war.  The behavior that perpetuates this race to oblivion can be changed only when people actually allow themselves to contemplate the true medical and ecological implications of such an event.  Only then will they make a conscious decision to devote their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to save the creation” (7).
     What Caldicott presented almost 4 decades ago in one chapter, “The Terminal Event”—knowledge that enables us “to contemplate the true medical and ecological implications” of nuclear war--, Jacobsen immensely, circumstantially, minutely reinforces.   Witness her chapters:  Part I: The Buildup (Or, How We Got There).  2: The first 24 Minutes.   3:  The next 24 Minutes.  4: The next (and Final) 24 Minutes. 5: The Next 24 Months and Beyond (Or, Where We Are Headed after a Nuclear Exchange).

     She concludes her text with these words that all of us should repeat to all we know:

“With time, after a nuclear war, all present-day knowledge will be gone.  Including the knowledge that the enemy was not North Korea, Russia, America, China, Iran, or anyone else vilified as a nation or a group.  It was the nuclear weapons that were the enemy of us all.  All along.” (297).   (--Dick).

 

Come to Nuclear Ban Treaty Week

nukewatch1 nukewatch1@lakeland.ws
Dear Nukewatch supporters, This year, Nukewatch will again attend the nuclear ban treaty meetings at the United Nations, known as the 3rd Meeting of States Parties (3MSP) to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The treaty is the first able to coordinate global, verifiable nuclear disarmament, yet no nuclear armed state is interested. The meetings will be held March 3-7 in New York.  Are you coming? There is still time to make your plans. Let’s meet up.  Again, we will be on the streets and inside the United Nations promoting the end of nuclear weapons…. We hope to meet up with any of you that will be there and look forward to continued collaboration for a nuclear-free future!  
Kelly Lundeen, Co-director
Nukewatch, 740A Round Lake Road
Luck, WI 54853 (715) 472-4185,
www.nukewatchinfo.org

 

Robert Keeler.  Sacred Soldier: The Dangers of Worshiping Warriors.  Simon and Schuster, 2024.

A Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and military veteran examines both the realities of the U.S. military and the worshipful attitude of members of the U.S. public toward it. How can the United States stop fighting needless wars, if it keeps worshiping the warriors? Why do presidents so easily fool people by using “support the troops” to justify war? Is “Thank you for your service” merely meaningless, or a meaningful sign of a dangerous modern idolatry? Are today’s soldiers truly defending freedom, or suppressing the freedom of other peoples? If the U.S. military is so powerful, why has it not definitively won a major war since 1945?

These are questions we seldom hear. Instead, what we see is ballplayers wearing military-style camouflage caps, baseball teams handing out a flag to the “veteran of the game,” and the Pentagon paying the National Football League to stage elaborate military displays like fighter-jet flyovers.

Sacred Soldier: The Dangers of Worshiping Warriors offers a more clear-eyed, warts-and-all view of the U.S. military. It argues that we owe warriors more than those five empty words of gratitude. We owe them honesty as they enlist; we owe them protection from rampant sexual abuse by other members of the military; hesitance to shed their blood in multiple deployments to unwinnable wars; and the highest possible quality of care when they return from battle, wounded in mind, body, and spirit.

 

END OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #216, FEBRUARY 12, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett  

OMNI SOVIET/RUSSOPHOBIA (and Socialismphobia) ANTHOLOGY #6, FEBRUARY 13, 2025

$
0
0

 

 

 

OMNI

SOVIET/RUSSOPHOBIA (and Socialismphobia) ANTHOLOGY #6,

FEBRUARY 13, 2025

COMPILED BY DICK BENNETT FOR A CULTURE OF PEACE, JUSTICE, AND ECOLOGY

HTTPS://omnicenter.org/donate/ 

 

What’s at Stake:   When Trump and Secretary Hegseth yesterday announced Trump’s decision to accept Putin’s terms for an end of the Ukraine War, I was completing this Anthology.   OMNI had published 6 anthologies offering 75 articles that increase evidence of Soviet/Russophobia as a central pathology dominating US culture and an impetus for many US wars.  In addition, most of the anthologies on US wars describe animosity toward the USSR/Russia, including the 34 anthologies on all aspects of the Ukraine War.   Ukraine War anthologies nos. 32-34 contain 66 articles.  I asked: Why is this major national dysfunction not the subject of a dozen major books and by hundreds of conferences and panels?  These anthologies are the answer.

     Yesterday on PBS Newshour February 12 Secretary Pete Hegseth      announced acceptance of Russia’s annexation of four Ukrainian provinces or oblasts ( Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson provinces), and Crimea, and denial of NATO membership to Ukraine.  This is a laudable advance for peace, both in the cessation of mass killing and physical destruction, and in the decrease of threat of nuclear war. I expect the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists to turn back its Doomsday Clock.  But the pathology will continue and all the conflicts of imperial competition.

 

CONTENTS: US RUSSOPHOBIC FOREIGN POLICY

Reuters.  “Trump says he discussed ending Ukraine war with Russia’s Putin.”
Andrew Day.  “Pete Hegseth Says No NATO Membership for Ukraine.”

 

Dick Bennett.  Soviet/Russophobia and Jesus’ Teachings about Enemies.

Steve Batterson.  The Prosecution of Professor Chandler Davis: McCarthyism, Communism, and the Myth of Academic Freedom. 

James W. Carden.   “The Real Meaning of the Fight Over Tulsi Gabbard.”   
Christopher Caldwell.   
“Everyone Wants to Seize Russia’s Money.”
Katrina vanden Heuvel.   “How Neocons, Neolibs, and their Media Collude for War.”  
James W. Carden.   “Legendary US Diplomat Pans Latest NATO Money Grab.” 
Dee Knight.   A Realistic Path to Peace.
Jeremy Kuzmarov.  Tamara Cofman Wittes , “Coordinator For Sanctions From Hell. . . .’”  
Doug Bandow. “U.S. Officials Believe That ‘We’ Are at War With Russia.”
Branko Marcetic.  “How the War in Ukraine Has Been a Major Contributor to Global Inflation. “

William Astore. “The Trillion-Dollar Blob.” 

George Paulson.  Pathological Hatred of Communism and Russia by the Democratic Party.

The Simone Weil Center’s Symposium on ‘Containment 2.0’.”  Gordon Hahn.
Caitlin A. Johnstone.   Imagine if Russia or China did the things Israel is doing in Gaza.” 

Pavan Kulkarni.  Why Niger declared U.S. Military presence in its territory illegal.” 
EL PAIS English.   “NATO Personnel Already in Ukraine. . . .
John Mearsheimer.  “ Ukraine’s Dangerous Last Gasp.” 
Andrew Cockburn.   “Our Real National Security Budget (With Winslow Wheeler).”
Davis Winkle.  Expanding NATO
John Westmoreland.  
Lenin’s ‘Last Testament’: The pro phetic last words of a Marxist for our times.”



TEXTS

 

UKRAINE WAR ENDING

Reuters.  “Trump says he discussed ending Ukraine war with Russia’s Putin.” ACURA (Feb 12, 2025). 
 U.S. President Donald Trump said he spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday about starting negotiations immediately to end the war in Ukraine. “We have also agreed to have our respective teams start negotiations immediately, and we will begin by calling President Zelenskiy, of Ukraine, to inform him of […]   
Read in browser »

Andrew Day.  “Pete Hegseth Says No NATO Membership for Ukraine.”  ACURA (Feb 12, 2025).
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said Wednesday that the Trump administration does not support NATO membership for Ukraine. Hegseth’s comments came during a meeting in Brussels on Ukrainian security.   Read in browser »

 

 

TEXTS COMPILED PRIOR TO REVERSAL OF US POLICY TOWARD UKRAINE

Christianity, War, Enemies, Ukraine War, Jesus’s Ethics

Does Christianity give us guidance?   

    In the Bible, Matthew 5:44, Jesus says, "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you."   The full verse reads: "You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven".   The verse is also found in Luke 6:27-28, which says, "But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you". 

    In regard to the one hundred years of US enmity against the Soviet Union, now Russia, one thing never mentioned by US officials or the corporate media or the military-industrial complex-- is Jesus’ injunction to “love your enemies.”    And US leaders and their corporate media largely skip over the questions of whether Putin is our enemy, or what might Jesus say in response to the long history of US hatred toward the Russkies?   Or is demonizing Russians a US pathology and such allegations are the construction of Russophobes, capitalist anti-communist fanatics, war-mongers, and opportunistic war profiteers?    
Here is a partial record of my Google search.

Jesus loved the people we hate. 

He Gets Us  https://hegetsus.com › articles › love-your-enemies

Who is "we"? It's each of us. It's you. It's me. All of us. What would the world look like if we each followed Jesus' teaching to love our enemies?
15 Bible Verses About Loving Your Enemies 

ABWE https://abwe.org › Blog  Aug 25, 2021 — As Christians, we're called to love our enemies. One way to express that love is by praying for those who persecute you (Matthew 5:44).
Jesus loves Putin

Catholic365.com   https://www.catholic365.com › article › jesus-loves-putin

Apr 1, 2022 — As a result, the teachings of Jesus do apply to us and we are told by Jesus to love our enemies. The enemy of Ukraine is our enemy. Putin is, ...
Opinion: Trying to Respond Christ-like to Putin 
  Kyiv Post  https://www.kyivpost.com › World  
May 14, 2023 — As a disciple of Jesus Christ, however, my master's marching orders are extremely clear: “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you ...
Putin in the hands of an Angry God - Pursuing God's Thoughts

WordPress.com  https://thinkinghisthoughts.wordpress.com › 2022/02/26  

Feb 26, 2022 — However, the command to Christians to “love your enemies” tell us what Christians are to do as God's people. That is, there are certain aspects ...
War comes to the Ukraine: Why not pray for Vladimir Putin?
VirtueOnline  https://virtueonline.org › war-comes-ukraine-why-not-p... 
  Feb 25, 2022 — So Christ Himself commands us to love and pray for our enemies. Vladimir Putin is certainly an enemy, therefore he needs our heartfelt prayer.  
What Does Loving Your Enemies Look Like in a War?

relevantmagazine.com   https://relevantmagazine.com › current › world › what-...  

Mar 8, 2022 — Love Your EnemiesLove your enemies and pray for those who persecute you. ​Matthew 5:44 is a counterintuitive teaching from Jesus. Instead of ...
A prayer for Russian President Putin

Catholic365.com    https://www.catholic365.com › article › a-prayer-for-russ...

Mar 28, 2022 — Lord Jesus, you urged your disciples to not just love your neighbor or those who love you back, but to love your enemy. You urged and taught ...
How to pray for Vladimir Putin

Baptist News Global    https://baptistnews.com › article › how-to-pray-for-vlad...  

Mar 1, 2022 — The Gospel text states: “But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.” Two questions come to mind: What does love ...
Franklin Graham's tweet about praying for Putin isn't ...

Standing for Freedom Center   https://www.standingforfreedom.com › 2022/02 › fran...

Feb 23, 2022 — Jesus said in Matthew 5:44-45, “But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father ...

 

HISTORICAL BACKGROUNDS: MCCARTHYISM, USA 1950S
Steve Batterson.  The Prosecution of Professor Chandler Davis: McCarthyism, Communism, and the Myth of Academic Freedom.  Monthly Review P, 2024. 

With a Foreword by Ellen Schrecker

Exposes the destruction of academic careers—and the complicity of educational institutions—in McCarthy’s America.

The Prosecution of Professor Chandler Davis tells the true tale of a mathematician who found himself taking an involuntary break from chalking equations to sit opposite a row of self-righteous anti-Communist congressmen at the height of the McCarthy era. Courageously asserting the First Amendment to confront a system rapidly descending into fascism, Davis testified before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). He became one of a small number of left wingers who served time for contempt of Congress.

In this fascinating and disturbing narrative, author Steve Batterson takes a deep dive into extant archival records generated by the FBI, HUAC, the University of Michigan, and repositories holding the papers of former Supreme Court justices. He looks at the plights of six faculty and graduate students. . . .Batterson exposes the ways that McCarthy’s righteous emissaries relied on all kinds of institutions in 1950s America—from Hollywood studios to universities—to sabotage the careers of anyone with a trace of “Red.”
What people are saying about The Prosecution of Professor Chandler Davis:

     The challenges Chandler faced in the 1950s have returned with a vengeance in the form of red state governors and legislators seeking to police what is taught and thought in universities and to punish those teachers whose ideas are at variance with a reactionary political agenda. We are now experiencing what many are calling a new McCarthyism. It’s a tribute to Steve Batterson’s book that we can raise these questions about the politics of jurisprudence and the vagaries and contingencies of the law. His detailed inquiry in The Prosecution of Professor Chandler Davis provides the historical insight that I associate with the best accounts of this kind: motives are complex, power a critical variable, timing an unpredictable factor, and rational argument not necessarily a winning strategy. This is a case study with resonance well beyond the specificities of the case. It is an important and worthwhile read.  Joan Scott, author of Knowledge, Power, and Academic Freedom

     Carefully done…and good reading as well.
Stephen Smale, UC-Berkeley mathematician, Fields Medalist (Nobel Prize for Mathematics)

     Steve Batterson’s compelling biography of Chandler Davis reveals a true American hero. His book, relying on primary sources, including intimate interviews, reveals the other side of the shameful McCarthy period, as a progressive thinker stood for his First Amendment rights, refusing to take the Fifth, and was punished for it. Chandler Davis’ coolness under fire and his exemplary life, unmarred by bitterness and full of hope and grace, is a revelation for us all.  Juan Cole, Richard P. Mitchell Collegiate Professor of History, University of Michigan

     At a moment when conservative forces are once more taking a sledgehammer to academic freedom, Steve Batterson tells the story of the intrepid and far-sighted H. Chandler Davis as it needs to be told. Calmly unpicking the tenacious fallacies used to rationalize the anticommunist purge of the 1950s, he provides a deeply researched and compulsively readable biography that is note-perfect for our time and full of surprising historical details.  Alan Wald, H. Chandler Davis Collegiate Professor Emeritus, University of Michigan, and author of American Night: The Literary Left in the Era of the Cold War

                                                                                             

James W. Carden.   “The Real Meaning of the Fight Over Tulsi Gabbard.”  ACURA(American Committee for US-Russia Accord) (Feb 04, 2025). 
Leading the charge against Gabbard on the Senate Intelligence Committee is ranking member Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia who, like his counterpart Adam Schiff (then serving as chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence), spent four years lying to the American people about Donald Trump’s alleged connections to the Kremlin.  Read in browser »                                                                               

Anything Goes in Thwarting Demons?
 Christopher Caldwell.    “Everyone Wants to Seize Russia’s Money. It’s a Terrible Idea.  ACURA (Apr 10, 2024).   
The Republican House speaker, Mike Johnson, has brought a glimmer of hope to  supporters of the Ukrainian war effort. He suggested to Fox News on March 31 that he would try to rally his divided party behind the so-called REPO Act. That piece of legislation would allow President Biden, working with European allies, to seize Russian […]
Read in browser »

Who Started This War?  Who Sustains It?
VIDEO The Nation’s Katrina vanden Heuvel.   “How Neocons, Neolibs, and their Media Collude for War.”  ACURA (Apr 08, 2024).
This is the first part of a discussion between Katrina vanden Heuvel and Neutrality Studies’ Pascal Lottaz. For a quarter of a century, vanden Heuvel was the editor in chief of the progressive magazine The Nation; she is currently The Nation’s publisher and editorial director, a widely read columnist as well as president of ACURA. […]
Read in browser »

James W. Carden.   “Legendary US Diplomat Pans Latest NATO Money Grab.”  ACURA (April 8, 2024).
Critics, such as the legendary American diplomat Chas Freeman say that the plan is simply a case of throwing good money—in this case, borrowed money—after bad.  Freeman sees this as a case of NATO clutching at straws, after all, as he tells Responsible Statecraft, “NATO has run out of Ukrainians to sacrifice on the battlefield […]

Read in browser »

Dee Knight (editor).   A Realistic Path to Peace: From Genocide to Global War and How We Can Stop It.  
Praise:Radhika Desai Director, Geopolitical Economy Research Group; Convenor, International Manifesto Group.  “This book of excellent essays analyses the current U.S. drive to war, against Russia and beyond. Knight exposes its roots and points to the only path to peace: opposition to the U.S. war machine.
Carlos Martinez, Editor, Invent the Future.  “Essential reading: a passionate plea for peace, and a call for unity and bold action against imperialism.”

About the Author
During the years of the U.S. war against Vietnam, Dee Knight was an editor of Amex-Canada, the newsletter of American exiles and expatriates who went to Canada in resistance to that war. He lived in Toronto, Canada, from 1968 to 1974. Amex-Canada helped organize American war resisters and their allies, including antiwar veterans, to sustain the resistance. In 1973 Knight helped to launch the National Council for Universal Unconditional Amnesty, which waged a campaign to end government repression of war resisters and active-duty U.S. soldiers.   Read More Frequently Ask Questions

New 2024 edition’s theme and new chapters include:
“Shock and Awe: Then and Now.”  Compares U.S. wars in Iraq, Syria, Libya with the official hysterical and self-righteous condemnation of Russian actions.

“The Long Road Ahead: The U.S. Is Snatching War from the Jaws of Peace.”  Explains how the U.S. has prevented peace, accuses Russia of ‘war crimes’ while brushing its own real war crimes under a rug, and calls for reviving an antiwar movement on a new basis.

Does China’s Rise Really Threaten the U.S.? says “fake news” is brainwashing the U.S. public to accept a new Cold War with China – to counter China’s Belt and Road Initiative and punish China for “human rights violations.” Details U.S. “pivot to Asia” with military buildup and new aggressive alliances. Cites polls that people don’t want war, more people see the U.S. as a threat to democracy than either China or Russia, and a Harvard study that 90%+ of the Chinese people like their government. Quotes Bernie Sanders on “relentless fearmongering about China.”

“’Yankees Go Home!’ Asians Say” describes a recent surge of protests against U.S. military bases in Okinawa and South Korea. The article includes an explanation that “the U.S. state of permanent war in Asia and the Pacific today is… the inevitable product of a centuries-long project of U.S. hegemony in the Pacific.”

“Joe Biden’s Saber-Rattling.”  U.S. threats against China over Taiwan, and U.S. justifications for war against Vietnam, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yugoslavia, and Korea.

Also “What America will and will not do in Ukraine,” and Scott Ritter’s defense of Russia’s special military operation, with support from Ellen Taylor.

GET THIS BOOK AND WRITE A REVIEW   $15 for Paperback,  $2.99 for Ebook
Send your review’s link to: info@realpathtopeace, and receive a free ebook to send to friends. We’ll send it for you if desired.

 

“Coordinator For Sanctions From Hell Appointed to Head Spook Agency that Supports Color Revolutions” By Jeremy Kuzmarov .   Covert Actions Magazine ( March 8, 2024). 

Tamara Cofman Wittes[Source: ned.org]

Since the outbreak of the Ukraine War, the Biden administration has applied sanctions on more than 15,000 Russian entities and individuals, marking Russia as among the most heavily sanctioned countries in history.  One analyst has likened the sanctions to the “economic carpet bombing of Russia,” and another to a “weapon of mass destruction.”   The pretext has repeatedly been fraudulent, with the Russian government accused of things there was no proof it had committed. The explicit goal, outlined in a Hudson Institute report, is to destroy Russia’s economy and “prepare for the dissolution of the Russian state.”  The lead U.S. State Department coordinator for the sanctions, Tamara Cofman Wittes, is highly intelligent, with a Ph.D. in political science from Georgetown University.[1] However, in her institutional role, she is a monster.    The sanctions have caused grave hardship for ordinary Russians, though have failed to bring down Russia’s economy or inspire civil unrest in the way that was planned.    [Source: sott.net]  Despite the policy failure, Cofman Wittes was recently appointed as the new head of the National Democratic Institute (NDI) effective March 15.  The NDI is largely funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a CIA offshoot founded in the 1980s to support political propaganda and opposition movements in countries targeted by the U.S. for regime change. The NDI is one of the NED’s four core institutes which purports to support democratization efforts and political parties worldwide that correlate roughly with the ideals of the Democratic Party.  Until her death in 2022, Madeleine Albright, a neo-conservative protégé of Zbigniew Brzezinski[2] who, as U.S. Secretary of State in the late 1990s championed the NATO war in the Balkans and sanctions against Iraq that killed half a million children, served as NDI Board Chair.   The NDI’s Board of Directors includes Michael McFaul, a Ukraine War hawk who, as an NDI consultant in the 1990s, supported Boris Yeltsin, an autocrat who stormed the parliament and sold off Russia’s assets at pennies to the dollar to predatory capitalists while acquiescing to NATO expansion in Eastern Europe.   [Source: youtube.com]Michael McFaul [Source: ndi.org]   The NDI Board also includes luminaries of the corporatist wing of the Democratic Party, like Stacey Abrams, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (AKA Wall Street’s think tank) and former Board member of the hawkish, CIA-linked Center for American Progress[3], and former DNC Chair Donna Brazile, a key purveyor of the Russia Gate hoax that helped mobilize public opinion in support of the new Cold War. . . .The NDI in fact has a long record of trying to sabotage socialist governments that strive to take control over their countries’ natural resources, equalize wealth and restrict foreign plundering. . . .


Doug Bandow. “U.S. Officials Believe That ‘We’ Are at War With Russia
.  ACURA (Mar 29, 2024).
Nothing Putin has said or done since suggests he is interested in European conquest. His military assaults, while lawless, have been limited to Georgia and Ukraine, and do not make him Hitler reincarnated. Even now President George W. Bush is responsible for far more civilian deaths.   
Read in browser »
Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, specializing in foreign policy and civil liberties. He worked as special assistant to President Ronald Reagan and editor of the political magazine Inquiry. He writes regularly for leading publications such as Fortune magazine, National Interest, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Times..          Read Full Bio 

 

Branko Marcetic.  “How the War in Ukraine Has Been a Major Contributor to Global Inflation. “ACURA

(Dec 06, 2024).
There is a growing realization that voters’ dissatisfaction with inflation resulted in Donald Trump’s election victory last month. But almost no attention has been placed on one of the major contributors to this inflation: the war in Ukraine, and the decision to repeatedly reject negotiating its end.
Read in browser »

William Astore. “The Trillion-Dollar Blob.”  ACURA

(Dec 06, 2024).
America has a bellicose, bullying, immature leadership that thinks military might is the answer to everything, as reflected by U.S. Special Forces in 80+ countries and roughly 800 bases globally. That global presence is unsustainable. It is also folly.
Read in browser »

Pathological Hatred of Communism and Russia by the Democratic Party by George Paulson  3-28-24.

 

 

 

Dick, I completely agree with the premise openly stated in the title of this [an article on the pathological hatred of communism and Russia].  We are, indeed, heading slow motion into World War III.  Sleepwalking into it, you might say.  In fact, it’s starting to remind me a bit of 1914 (especially if the Russians are able to connect the recent terror attack in Moscow with Ukrainian intelligence).  But reading through it, I can only conclude that the author is part of the problem, in my opinion.  The absolute unhinged Russophobia that now characterizes nearly the entire Democratic Party spectrum makes WWIII more likely.  Much of this irrational and ahistorical way of thinking is clearly a product of relentless Cold War propaganda which is deeply embedded in the political DNA of most Democrats; but another equally important component is the irrational and entirely unhinged reaction to the 2016 election.  I am, of course, referring to the entire Russiagate nonsense, which helped create a domestic political climate where even the idea of diplomacy with nuclear-armed Russia is absolutely out of the question.  The author references “Vlad” and the Russian threat to use nuclear weapons.  The glib and breezy demonization of Vladimir Putin—de rigour on the part of the vast majority of Democrats--does not make WWIII less likely.  It makes it more likely, because it makes even the concept of diplomacy impossible.  For the record, referring to Putin as “Vlad” is a cheap example of this.  Even during the worst days of the Cold War, we avoided this type of stupid, childish, personal insulting of the Soviet leadership.  At this point, there is nothing—I mean nothing—that liberal Democrats will not believe about Putin and Russia. Do you seriously think that this mindset makes a hot war between Russia and the USA less likely?  Does the Neo-McCarthyism promoted by the Democratic Party—smearing anyone who pushes back against the official narrative that poor little old Ukraine was just minding its own business when big bad Vlad and the evil Russians invaded out of the blue—make a war less likely?  As for Putin and nukes, the Russian doctrine regarding the use of nuclear weapons is not news.  Again, remind me, please, who walked out of various arms control agreements since the dissolution of the USSR?  Remind me, which country insists on its right to station nuclear weapons on the other’s border?  The truth is that the Democratic Party is a pro-war party.  It is a virulently Russophobic party.  And while our foreign policy is bipartisan, the Biden administration bears ultimate responsibility for the disaster unfolding in Ukraine. Actually, disaster is not the right word.  Catastrophe is probably better.  This war could have easily been avoided with even a tiny bit of diplomacy. But any diplomacy was off the table, as our current Secretary of State made clear.  The Biden administration provoked this war, a war that nuclear-armed Russia considers to be existential, in the actual meaning of the word.  The Biden administration has miscalculated on a scale that has no comparison in all of American history.  This is the most criminally incompetent and reckless administration of my lifetime.  And that makes them, therefore, NOT the lesser of two evils.  We are going to need a lot of luck to avoid the very unimaginable.  Peace, George 

The Simone Weil Center’s Symposium on ‘Containment 2.0’.”  ACURA (Apr 01, 2024). 
In response to a March 6, 2024 article in Foreign Affairs titled “America’s New Twilight Struggle with Russia: To Prevail, Washington Must Revive Containment,” The Simone Weil Center will be publishing a series of responses from several Russia experts and foreign policy thinkers. The series begins with a contribution by Dr. Gordon Hahn.  
Read in browser »    Gordon M. Hahn is a researcher specializing in Islam and politics in Russia and Eurasia, international relations in Eurasia and terrorism in Eurasia. He is the author of several books and a number of research articles on Russia and the Caucasus Emirate.. Wikipedia

Caitlin A. Johnstone.   Imagine if Russia or China did the things Israel is doing in Gaza.”  Mronline.org (3-30-24).

It’s almost cliché at this point to say “imagine if Russia or China did this”, but such comparisons are important for retaining a sense of perspective on just how evil the western political-media class is being about Gaza right now.

Originally published: Caitlin A Johnstone Blog  on March 28, 2024 (more by Caitlin A Johnstone Blog).    Human Rights, Inequality, State Repression, WarAmericas, Asia, China, Europe, Gaza, Israel, Middle East, Palestine, Russia, United StatesNewswire

Imagine how the western political-media class would be acting if Russia or China was bombing and starving a walled-in population of two million, half of them children. Seriously, imagine it. Imagine the rage and vitriol. Imagine the nonstop media coverage.

When Russia invaded Ukraine, U.S. media coverage of that war exceeded the media coverage of all U.S. wars in the previous three decades. If Russia were deliberately and systematically exterminating civilians in Ukraine or anywhere else, the western media coverage of those war crimes would be many times more.

It’s almost cliché at this point to say “imagine if Russia or China did this”, but such comparisons are important for retaining a sense of perspective on just how evil the western political-media class is being about Gaza right now. We’re seeing articles come out in the mass media about starvation in Gaza which never once even mention the word “Israel”. Do you think that would be happening if this were being perpetrated by a government which defies the western empire? Of course not. . . .  MORE

 

Pavan Kulkarni.  Why Niger declared U.S. Military presence in its territory illegal.”  Editor.  mronline.org (3-23-24).

Niger declared the U.S. military deployment in its territory “illegal” on Saturday, March 16, after a U.S. delegation allegedly threatened “retaliation” against the largest country in West Africa for its ties with Russia and Iran.

Originally published: Internationalist 360°  on March 19, 2024 by Pavan Kulkarni (more by Internationalist 360°) (Posted Mar 22, 2024).   Empire, Imperialism, Inequality, WarAfrica, Americas, Niger, United StatesNewswireU.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM)

Only months after forcing its former colonizer France to withdraw its troops, Niger, West Africa’s largest country, has said the presence of U.S. troops is illegal. This could be a major blow to the U.S. military’s power-projection capacity in the region.   Niger declared the U.S. military deployment in its territory “illegal” on Saturday, March 16, after a U.S. delegation allegedly threatened “retaliation” against the largest country in West Africa for its ties with Russia and Iran. . . .  MORE

 

EL PAIS English.   “NATO personnel already in Ukraine for arms control, intelligence operations and military training.”  ACURA (Mar 22, 2024). 
Emmanuel Macron broke the taboo in February. NATO already assists Ukraine in virtually every possible aspect, from supplying weaponry and intelligence on Russian targets and the positions of enemy bombers to training thousands of Ukrainian troops in Europe. But until the French president suggested it, no one had dared to raise the question of Atlantic Alliance […]    Read in browser »

VIDEO: John Mearsheimer.  “ Ukraine’s Dangerous Last Gasp.”  ACURA (Mar 22, 2024).
Judge Andrew Napolitano and Professor John Mearsheimer take stock of the current situation in Ukraine.  
Read in browser »

 

Andrew Cockburn.   “Our Real National Security Budget (With Winslow Wheeler).”  ACURA (Mar 21, 2024). 
The Biden Administration has just published its proposed budget, generating copious commentary, much of it displaying a commensurate degree of misunderstanding, especially regarding our gargantuan national security spending.  To get at the truth of the matter, I consulted my friend Winslow Wheeler, who has been observing the insalubrious intricacies of the budget process over the past fifty years as a senior aide to Senators from both parties as well as a senior analyst for the General Accounting Office and directing the Center for Defense Information.

The defense budget just posted by the administration is being described as approaching a trillion dollars. Is that accurate?     No. It's actually a lot more than that. In fact it's beginning to inch up on $2 trillion. 
How so?   The problem is that when most people look at the defense budget, they don't count everything that we spend even for the Pentagon. But in addition to that, there are hundreds of billions of dollars outside of the Pentagon's budget that we spend for national security. Things like the nuclear weapons activities in the Department of Energy; that’s $37 billion$26 billion for retired military pensions and healthcare and $12 billion for the Selective Service, the National Defense Stockpile, and a strange and suspicious looking category for the international activities of the FBI in something called “Defense Related Activities. . . . .  MORE   
Read in browser »

EXPANDING NATO IN POLAND AND GERMANY
Davis Winkle.  “US Think Tank Says Station Troops in Poland.”  ACURA (Mar 21, 2024).    
The report’s author also recommended that the Air Force station an additional F-16 squadron in Germany; increase anti-submarine warfare capability and air defense forces; bolster stockpiles of prepositioned equipment and ammunition; and continue modernization, cyber, space and security cooperation efforts. 
Davis Winkie covers the Army for Military Times.  Read in browser »

 

Lenin’s ‘Last Testament’: The pro phetic last words of a Marxist for our times. “  Editor.  mronline.org (1-31-24).

The myth that Lenin led to Stalin is exposed by Lenin’s Last Testament which argues for more democracy and removing Stalin from power, writes John Westmoreland.

 

 

CONTENTS US RUSSOPHOBIA #5

New Cold War 2024

BIGOTRY V. SOVIET UNION/RUSSIA
Victor Grossman.  "Achtung! Die Russen kommen!"
Walter Hixson.  “The Myth of U.S. Exceptionalism.”
Sharon Rudahl.  A Graphic Biography of Paul Robeson.

Reuters.  Germany’s two-year silence.

Diana Johnstone.  Russia not invited to D-Day Remembrance.
William Drew.  New Cold War
Russophobic Propaganda.
Katrina vanden Heuvel.  Biden’s old Cold warmaking foreign policies.

George Paulson.  New McCarthyism.  (Art Hobson, American Midnight by Adam Hochschild.) 
George Paulson.  Anti-Russia Victoria Nuland Resigning.
Dave DeCamp.  “Victoria Nuland, Notorious Russia Hawk, Resigning. . . .
Joe Lauria.  “Russian Imperialism?”

 

 

 

END OMNI

SOVIET/RUSSOPHOBIA ANTHOLOGY #6


OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #218, February 17, 2025.

$
0
0

  

 

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #218, February 17, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett


Green New Deal. Kate Aronoff.  Overheated.

Greenpeace

Inside Climate News

 

GREEN NEW DEAL
Kate Aronoff.  Overheated: How Capitalism Broke the Planet—and How We Fight Back.  Bold Type Books, 2021.
[Aronoff reflects the long tradition of Utopian thought and practice.  For utopianism means the ability to imagine a better world, without which we can’t get started,--such as with the New Deal of the 1930s.  –D]

     “Decarbonizing the global economy and adapting to the climate changed century ahead will be the single hardest and most important thing our species has ever done.* It’s impossible without a big, democratic government and massive state investment, as well as the dismantling of the most powerful industry that has ever existed.  That, in turn, seems dangerously far off unless some critical mass of people see the Green New Deal as their path to a better life and manage to overcome the rank [class] and racist divide-and-conquer politics that have been so successful at stopping efforts to turn these United States into a more perfect union, and this planet into a fairer place. . . .
     A
Green New Deal isn’t just about subbing out one form or energy for another as all else states equal.  It means rooting out the deep power imbalances that have made the fossil fuel economy possible and will keep toxic and deadly extraction humming along if they remain in place.  It means writing a new social contract in its place that ensures people are as free as money to move around the places where they were born and be welcomed with open arms where they weren’t.  It’s about building a genuinely sustainable United States….Should all that succeed, the resulting society will also be a happier one,” where “people can dream about abundant, joyful futures and have the tools to turn those dreams into reality” (358-59).    [Aronoff discusses the UN World Happiness Report 2019 on p. 350.] [*As you know, I add nuclear weapons and war for the two hardest and most important things for our species to do.  –D]

Greenpeace

 

Dick, after more than 7 years of fighting Big Oil company Energy Transfer’s $300 million lawsuit against us, we are now just days away from going to trial in North Dakota.
This is the biggest case ever filed in North Dakota, and a negative outcome for Greenpeace USA could threaten every American’s fundamental rights to free speech and peaceful protest.   Next week, we’re inviting every Greenpeace USA supporter to join us for a virtual event where we’ll be sharing important updates about this case and what it means for our entire movement.

   

Inside Climate News (ICN) is increasingly an excellent source of current climate information, as it increasingly foregrounds the climate origin of the increasingly extreme weather.  I count 17 directly or indirectly climate stories reported in the ICN Weekly of 12-15-24.   <newsletters@insideclimatenews.org>    The ICN Weekly of 1-11-25 is similar.   The intro. focuses on the present LA fires:  Trump blaming governor Newsom,  Trump’s  failure to mention the impact of climate change, and “the information ecosystem… expected to be further tested during climate-fueled disasters as social media platforms like Facebook roll back fact-checking programs.”  Then it gives 11 abstracts with five reports of events traceable directly to climate change, ending with “Climate Trauma Is a Thing. Here’s What the Research Reveals.”   Climate is  “its own beast that we now want to study on its own and deserves its own recognition, awareness and characterization.”

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #217, FEBRUARY 19, 2025.

$
0
0

 

 

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #217, FEBRUARY 19, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett  

Origins of Wars:
Walter Karp.  Indispensable Enemies: leaders’ desire for power.
Herman and Chomsky.   Manufacturing Consent: media support of ruling power.
Monthly Review:  failure to abide by international weapons treaties.

 

Leaders’ Desire for Power

Walter Karp, Indispensable Enemies: The Politics of Misrule in America.  Saturday Review P, 1973.

In prosecuting an aggressive foreign policy, the party oligarchs have been driven by no cause or interest external to themselves: by no fundamental economic interest, by no genuine threat to the security of the Republic, by no irresistible poplar demand.  Except in the post-World War I period [v. “Wilson’s war”], American foreign policy has been gratuitously aggressive since 1898, a policy carried out for no compelling reason except the oligarchs’ wish to prosecute an aggressive foreign policy.  Their reason for wanting such a policy, however, is scarcely mysterious and certainly not irrational.  An aggressive foreign policy safeguards the power of the power wielders and strengthens their control over those whom they rule” (248).   

Control of Media by Ruling Oligarchs and Groups

Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.  1st ed. 1988.   Paperback, 2nd ed. January 15, 2002   by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky.

Publisher’s description
In this pathbreaking work, Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky show that, contrary to the usual image of the news media as cantankerous, obstinate, and ubiquitous in their search for truth and defense of justice, in their actual practice they defend the economic, social, and political agendas of the privileged groups that dominate domestic society, the state, and the global order.

Based on a series of case studies—including the media’s dichotomous treatment of “worthy” versus “unworthy” victims, “legitimizing” and “meaningless” Third World elections, and devastating critiques of media coverage of the U.S. wars against Indochina—Herman and Chomsky draw on decades of criticism and research to propose a Propaganda Model to explain the media’s behavior and performance.

Their new introduction updates the Propaganda Model and the earlier case studies, and it discusses several other applications. These include the manner in which the media covered the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement and subsequent Mexican financial meltdown of 1994-1995, the media’s handling of the protests against the World Trade Organization, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund in 1999 and 2000, and the media’s treatment of the chemical industry and its regulation. What emerges from this work is a powerful assessment of how propagandistic the U.S. mass media are, how they systematically fail to live up to their self-image as providers of the kind of information that people need to make sense of the world, and how we can understand their function in a radically new way.

 

Failure to abide by International weapons treatiesAbout Manufacturing Consent

A “compelling indictment of the news media’s role in covering up errors and deceptions” (The New York Times Book Review) due to the underlying economics of publishingfrom famed scholars Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky. With a new introduction.

In this pathbreaking work, Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky show that, contrary to the usual image of the news media as cantankerous, obstinate, and ubiquitous in their search for truth and defense of justice, in their actual practice they defend the economic, social, and political agendas of the privileged groups that dominate domestic society, the state, and the global order.

Based on a series of case studies—including the media’s dichotomous treatment of “worthy” versus “unworthy” victims, “legitimizing” and “meaningless” Third World elections, and devastating critiques of media coverage of the U.S. wars against Indochina—Herman and Chomsky draw on decades of criticism and research to propose a Propaganda Model to explain the media’s behavior and performance.

Their new introduction updates the Propaganda Model and the earlier case studies, and it discusses several other applications. These include the manner in which the media covered the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement and subsequent Mexican financial meltdown of 1994-1995, the media’s handling of the protests against the World Trade Organization, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund in 1999 and 2000, and the media’s treatment of the chemical industry and its regulation. What emerges from this work is a powerful assessment of how propagandistic the U.S. mass media are, how they systematically fail to live up to their self-image as providers of the kind of information that people need to make sense of the world, and how we can understand their function in a radically new way.

See Less

About Manufacturing Consent

A “compelling indictment of the news media’s role in covering up errors and deceptions” (The New York Times Book Review) due to the underlying economics of publishingfrom famed scholars Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky. With a new introduction.

In this pathbreaking work, Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky show that, contrary to the usual image of the news media as cantankerous, obstinate, and ubiquitous in their search for truth and defense of justice, in their actual practice they defend the economic, social, and political agendas of the privileged groups that dominate domestic society, the state, and the global order.

Based on a series of case studies—including the media’s dichotomous treatment of “worthy” versus “unworthy” victims, “legitimizing” and “meaningless” Third World elections, and devastating critiques of media coverage of the U.S. wars against Indochina—Herman and Chomsky draw on decades of criticism and research to propose a Propaganda Model to explain the media’s behavior and performance.

Their new introduction updates the Propaganda Model and the earlier case studies, and it discusses several other applications. These include the manner in which the media covered the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement and subsequent Mexican financial meltdown of 1994-1995, the media’s handling of the protests against the World Trade Organization, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund in 1999 and 2000, and the media’s treatment of the chemical industry and its regulation. What emerges from this work is a powerful assessment of how propagandistic the U.S. mass media are, how they systematically fail to live up to their self-image as providers of the kind of information that people need to make sense of the world, and how we can understand their function in a radically new way.

See Less

 U.S. preparations for “prolonged and limited” nuclear war and  repeated refusal to abide by international agreements.

“Notes from the Editors.”   Monthly Review(September 2024 Volume 76, Number 4).   This month’s “Notes from the Editors” recounts the history of U.S. preparations for “prolonged and limited” nuclear war and Washington’s repeated refusal to abide by international agreements regarding nuclear weaponry. With the recent announcement that the United States will be stationing nuclear-capable Tomahawk missiles on German soil—within minutes’ striking distance of Moscow—this history is now, troublingly, more relevant than ever. | more…     Source

 

OMNI WHITE CHRISTIAN, PLUTOCRATIC, OLIGARCHIC, THEOCRATIC, FUNDAMENTALIST NATIONALISM ANTHOLOGY, #2 February 20, 2025

$
0
0

 

OMNI

WHITE CHRISTIAN, PLUTOCRATIC, OLIGARCHIC, THEOCRATIC, FUNDAMENTALIST NATIONALISM ANTHOLOGY, #2

 February 20, 2025

Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace, Justice, and Ecology

https://omnicenter.org/donate

 

What’s at Stake:   Christian nationalism radically shapes what Americans think about who they are as a people, what their future should look like, and how they should get there.”  Andrew Whitehead.

 

CONTENTS

Local Connection:  FFRF Chapter Actions.

 

History

Whitehead.  Taking America Back for God.

Onishi.  Preparing for W ar: The Extremist History of White Christian Nationalism.
Seidel.  “The Shadow Network, Project 2025….”
Seidel.   “Church-state separation and. . .Christian Nationalist abuse of power.”
 

Taylor.  The Violent Take It by Force.

Du Mez.  Jesus and John Wayne.

History, Analysis, Action

American Christian Nationalism: Neither American nor Christian by Michael W. Austin.

Andrew Whitehead.  American Idolatry.  

Scott Robinson.  The Three Main Enemies of Democracy.  3 books on the Republican Party, Christian Nationalists, and the Oligarchy.

 Plutocracy and CN
Nicholas Powers.  “Wealthy Donors Bankroll Christian Nationalists to    Sustain Unregulated Capitalism.”    
Bruce Gourley.  Plutocratic Theocracy: How an alliance of extreme market capitalists    and Christian Nationalists is working to remake American society.”

Supreme Court

Gourley.  “Supreme Theocrats.”

 

TAKING ACTION

Ajoy.  Star-Spangled Jesus.

Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers
How to End Christian Nationalism By Amanda Tyler. 

Bruce Gourley.  “Authentic Dialogue….”

Robert Edwards.  Resisting the Right.

 

Christian Nationalism Anthology #1

 

 

 

TEXTS

Local Connection

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION,  A NATIONAL AND LOCAL BULWARK AGAINST Plutocratic, Oligarchic Fascism with an Ozarks Chapter, February 2025 Newsletter.
Ozarks Chapter of Freedom From Religion Foundation <contact@zeffy.com>

Feb 17, 2025         

Hello Dick, and Happy President's Day,

Whew....where to start....Legislators are trying to ramrod religion (chaplains) into classrooms, the US President is allocating resources to root out anti-Christian bias (what!?!?) and politicians are drafting policy to make it near impossible for citizen led ballot initiatives.  In my 43+ years, I've never seen the pillars of Democracy come under such intense pressure, and it feels like the time we're living in now is a tipping point.  I hope that by connecting with reasonable and rational citizens, including those who embrace religion, we can coalesce and stamp down the Christian Nationalism that is being injected into our lives daily.  Secular citizens must be proactive in this effort!

 

PLEASE TAKE ACTION!!!  BEGINNING THIS WEEK, FEBRUARY 17th: 

Six bills are running through the Arkansas General Assembly that would add even more barriers for citizens to take part in direct democracy. Please leave a message for your Senator at 501-682-2902 and your Representative at 501-682-6211 and ask them to vote against Senate Bills 207 through 212.

·SB207 would scare away people from signing ballot measure petitions by requiring canvassers to talk about criminal penalties for fraud. People already know fraud is illegal.

SB208 would require that canvassers check the ID of voters before allowing them to sign. This is merely an attempt to slow the signature gathering process.

SB209 would throw out legitimate signatures of voters for wrongdoing by canvassers. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

SB210 would require canvassers to watch a voter read the ballot measure or read the ballot measure out loud to a voter before collecting the signature. Canvassers are already required to carry copies of the measure that people can read. The Secretary of State’s office said the reading of the longest recent ballot measure would take eight minutes — another strategy to deter people from signing a ballot measure petition.

SB211 would create red tape that would make it harder for ballot measure campaigns to collect signatures. There is already a dizzying amount of red tape in the signature collection process.

SB212 would create a “Document Validity Division” — a law enforcement agency of the Secretary of State. But the office already reviews the validity of documents and can refer potential lawbreakers to prosecutors. It would just create more bureaucracy and complicated legal questions.

Speak up for the constitutional rights of voters. Call your Senator and Representative now ask them to vote against Senate Bills 207 through 212!

 

Senate at 501-682-2902

House of Representatives at 501-682-6211

 

In other news, the Ozarks Chapter continues to put together an exciting lineup of events, activities and speaking engagements.  Last month, our chapter contributed over 16 man hours to help the NWA Women's Shelter Thrift Store sort through incoming donations, rack clothing and assist with light cleaning duties.  The employees were very appreciative of our help, and the GM reached out afterwards to let me know how valuable our work is in protecting the separation between church and state

 

HISTORY

Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States by Andrew L. Whitehead.   Oxford UP, 2020.

Abstract

Taking America Back for God conclusively reveals that understanding the current cultural and political climate in the United States requires reckoning with Christian nationalism. Christian ideals and symbols have long played an important role in public life in the United States, but Christian nationalism demands far more than a recognition of religious heritage. At heart, Christian nationalism fights to preserve a particular kind of social order, an order in which everyone—Christians and non-Christians, native-born and immigrants, whites and minorities, men and women—recognizes their “proper” place in society. The first comprehensive empirical analysis of Christian nationalism in the United States, Taking America Back for God illustrates the scope and tremendous influence of Christian nationalism on debates surrounding the most contentious social issues dominating American public discourse. Drawing on multiple sources of national survey data collected over the past several decades and in-depth interviews, Whitehead and Perry document how Christian nationalism radically shapes what Americans think about who they are as a people, what their future should look like, and how they should get there. Regardless of Americans’ political or religious characteristics, whether they are Ambassadors, Accommodators, Resisters, or Rejecters of Christian nationalism provides powerful insight into what they think about immigration, Muslims, gun control, police shootings, atheists, gender roles, and many other political issues—even who they want in the White House. Taking America Back for God convincingly shows how Christian nationalists’ desire for political power, rigid social boundaries, and hierarchical order creates significant consequences for all Americans.

Keywords: Christian nationalismreligionpoliticsUnited StatesracegenderDonald Trumpimmigrationsexuality

 

 

War on Democracy:  Origin of INSURRECTION JANUARY 6, 2021, Civil War?

Bradley Onishi.  Preparing for War: The Extremist History of White Christian Nationalism.   2023. 
The events of January 6, 2021, shocked the nation and the world. But to those who lived through White Christian nationalism, consumed its media, and practiced its teachings, the Insurrection was the logical outcome of a seventy-five-year war on American democracy.

Despite a growing body of literature that analyzes White Christian nationalism in the United States, there are no works that bring together firsthand accounts of the decades-long culture wars that set the stage for the violent White Christian nationalism plaguing the country with historical analyses of the events, leaders, and communities that prepared the troops and led the charge. PREPARING FOR WAR uses Onishi’s lived experience as an Evangelical insider as a prism for understanding the violence and extremism of the White Christian nationalists at the center of our current political moment. It asks: How did the rise of the Religious Right, from 1964-2015, eventually give birth to violent White Christian nationalism during the Trump presidency and beyond? What are the foundational components of the “alternative” worldview that propelled some of the most conservative religious communities in the country to ignite a cold civil war? How can the history of the Religious Right provide a basis for anticipating how White Christian nationalism will bear on our public square in the years to come?

 In this compelling and scholarly mix of memoir and cultural and political history, Onishi brings to bear his experience as a former Christian nationalist movement insider to expose the radicalism behind the January 6th insurrection. Gripping and essential reading for anyone who wants to understand the threat that This movement poses to American democracy.” – Katherine Stewart, Author of The Power Worshippers: Inside the Dangerous World of Religious Nationalism

Preparing for War, Bradley Onishi traces the history of White Christian Nationalism from the John Birch Society to the Big Lie and the January 6 terrorist assault on the U.S. Capitol, a narrative enlivened by the author’s own occasional intersections with the movement. This is an excellent and important book, both chilling and prophetic.” – Randall Balmer Professor of Religion, Dartmouth College and Author of Bad Faith: Race and the Rise of the Religious Right

Onishi takes us on a sweeping yet personal journey through modern American religious and political history to understand the violent, extremist strains of white Christian America that led to the January 6th insurrection. With insight from hundreds of interviews, deep scholarship, and his own escape from white Christian Nationalism, Onishi’s Preparing for War is a clear account of what happened and clarion warning about what is coming. Compelling and timely.” – Andrew Seidel, Constitutional Lawyer at Americans United and author of American Crusade: How the Supreme Court Is Weaponizing Religious Freedom.
 

The Shadow Network of Christian Nationalism “is spreading into every facet of American life.” 
Andrew Seidel.  “The Shadow Network, Project 2025 and the Humongous Fungus.”  Church and State (Nov. 2024).

Alliance Defending Freedom.
Family Research Council
First Liberty Institute
American Center for Law and Justice

 

Andrew Seidel.  “Church-state separation and the Big Lebowski: The Christian Nationalist abuse of power.”  Church and State (Nov. 2024).  Reports the work of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, integral to “defending our democracy.”

 

TRUMP AND CHRISTIAN NATIONALISM

The Violent Take It by Force: The Christian Movement That Is Threatening Our Democracy By Matthew D. Taylor.  Broadleaf, 2024. 
Publisher’s description:
"Required reading for anyone seeking to understand Christian nationalism."—Kristin Kobes Du Mez, author of Jesus and John Wayne

A propulsive account of the network of charismatic Christians that consolidated support for Donald Trump and is reshaping religion and politics in the US.

Over the last decade, the Religious Right has evolved. Some of the more extreme beliefs of American evangelicalism have begun to take hold in the mainstream. Scholar Matthew D. Taylor pulls back the curtain on a little-known movement of evangelical Christians who see themselves waging spiritual battles on a massive scale. Known as the New Apostolic Reformation, this network of leaders and believers emerged only three decades ago but now yields colossal influence, galvanizing support for Trump and far-right leaders around the world. In this groundbreaking account, Taylor explores the New Apostolic Reformation from its inception in the work of a Fuller Seminary professor, to its immense networks of apostles and prophets, to its role in the January 6 riot. Charismatic faith provided righteous fuel to the fire that day, where symbols of spiritual warfare blazed: rioters blew shofars, worship music blared, and people knelt in prayer. This vision of charismatic Christianity now animates millions, lured by Spirit-filled revival and visions of Christian supremacy.

Taylor's unprecedented access to the movement's leaders, archives, internal conference calls, and correspondence gives us an insider account of the connection between charismatic evangelicalism and hard-right rhetoric. Taylor delves into prophetic memes like the Seven Mountains Mandate, the Appeal to Heaven flag, and the Cyrus Anointing; Trump's spiritual advisor Paula White's call for "angelic reinforcements"; and Sean Feucht and Bethel Music's titanic command of worship styles across America. Throughout, Taylor maps a movement of magnetic leaders and their uncompromising beliefs--and where it might be headed next. When people long to conquer a nation for God, democracy can be brought to the brink.

Endorsements
"Matthew D. Taylor's work is a gift. He has given us an empathetic, fair-minded, highly intelligent, and eminently readable story that explains one of the most important religious movements in modern America. Most people don't even know what the New Apostolic Reformation is, much less that it has been a driving force of Christian TrumpismThe Violent Take It by Force will change that."  --Jon Ward, author of Testimony and Camelot's End
 For more endorsements go to:     https://www.broadleafbooks.com/store/product/9781506497785/The-Violent-Take-It-by-Force

 Kristin Kobes Du Mez.   Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation.   Liveright, 2020.

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER  The “paradigm-influencing” book (Christianity Today) that is fundamentally transforming our understanding of white evangelicalism in America.

Jesus and John Wayne is a sweeping, revisionist history of the last seventy-five years of white evangelicalism, revealing how evangelicals have worked to replace the Jesus of the Gospels with an idol of rugged masculinity and Christian nationalism—or in the words of one modern chaplain, with “a spiritual badass.”  As acclaimed scholar Kristin Du Mez explains, the key to understanding this transformation is to recognize the centrality of popular culture in contemporary American evangelicalism. Many of today’s evangelicals might not be theologically astute, but they know their VeggieTales, they’ve read John Eldredge’s Wild at Heart, and they learned about purity before they learned about sex—and they have a silver ring to prove it. Evangelical books, films, music, clothing, and merchandise shape the beliefs of millions. And evangelical culture is teeming with muscular heroes—mythical warriors and rugged soldiers, men like Oliver North, Ronald Reagan, Mel Gibson, and the Duck Dynasty clan, who assert white masculine power in defense of “Christian America.” Chief among these evangelical legends is John Wayne, an icon of a lost time when men were uncowed by political correctness, unafraid to tell it like it was, and did what needed to be done.

Challenging the commonly held assumption that the “moral majority” backed Donald Trump in 2016 and 2020 for purely pragmatic reasons, Du Mez reveals that Trump in fact represented the fulfillment, rather than the betrayal, of white evangelicals’ most deeply held values: patriarchy, authoritarian rule, aggressive foreign policy, fear of Islam, ambivalence toward #MeToo, and opposition to Black Lives Matter and the LGBTQ community. A much-needed reexamination of perhaps the most influential subculture in this country, Jesus and John Wayne shows that, far from adhering to biblical principles, modern white evangelicals have remade their faith, with enduring consequences for all Americans.

Kristin Kobes Du Mez is a professor of history at Calvin University and the author of A New Gospel for Women. Learn More

 

INTRODUCTION:  HISTORY, ANALYSIS, ACTION

American Christian Nationalism: Neither American nor Christian by Michael W. Austin.  Foreword by Marlena Graves.  Eerdmans, 2024.  130 Pages.     DOWNLOAD BOOK FLYER

Description  Contents  Author  Praise
Publisher’s Description
Michael W. Austin shows how nationalism is contrary to American values and Christian virtues—and offers us a better form of civic engagement.
In this brief, thought-provoking book, Michael W. Austin turns his keen mind for ethics toward the crisis currently facing our democracy: the rise of American Christian nationalism. Austin first accessibly explains the meaning and history behind nationalism. He then systematically shows how the ideology contradicts American values like liberty, equality, and justice as well as Christian virtues like humility, faith, hope, and love. Ultimately, he argues that the Beloved Community, first developed by Martin Luther King Jr. and others, offers a better model for an authentically Christian and American community. Readers frustrated by partisan strife will find a faithful guide in Austin’s thoughtful volume.

 

CHRISTIAN NATIONALISM V. GOSPEL CHRISTIANITY

Andrew Whitehead.  American Idolatry: How Christian Nationalism Betrays the Gospel and Threatens the Church.   Baker Books, 2023.

What the book is about

Explores how Christian nationalism harms American Christianity. 

Identifies three idols of Christian nationalism that Whitehead believes corrupt American Christianity: power, fear, and violence. He argues that these idols threaten the spiritual lives of American Christians and the church. 

What the book's arguments are 

Christian nationalism weakens the church by stirring up fear of others instead of encouraging peacemaking, hope, and love.

Violence is a natural result of constantly stoking fear and threat.

The use of violence signals a distrust of God's work in the world and seeing the image of God in all people.


Review of American Idolatry.  Foreword Reviews   https://www.forewordreviews.com › ... › Religion. 
 Aug 15, 2023 — Sociologist Andrew L. Whitehead's American Idolatry is a fascinating investigation of politics and racism in American Christian evangelicalism.

 

ANALYSIS OF 3 ANTI-DEMOCRATIC FORCES
They Long to End Democracy .  3 book series by Scott Robinson.  Paperback Edition 2024.

There are three organizations in the United State that have all, in recent years, signaled and even said outright that Democracy's day is done in the United States - and each is poised to replace it.

These groups include the Grand Old Party - US Republicans, who have declared for almost two decades now their desire to install a "permanent majority"; the Christian Nationalists, Evangelicals who have believed since the mid-Seventies that the United States should be a theocracy, not a democracy, with their own people in charge; and the oligarchy, a network of ultra-wealthy citizens - the top 1% of the top 1% - who have labored for decades to supplant the New Deal framework of the United States with a neoliberal one more favorable to their interests.

This series of short books presents overviews of all three of these groups - who they are, what they're about, and how they intend to go about implementing their own visions of American governance.

Read more

All titles below are free to borrow with a Kindle Unlimited subscription. View the Kindle Edition of this series to see the eligible titles.

Books in this series (3 books)

They Long to End Democracy: The GOPby Scott Robinson.

Read moreBottom of Form

They Long to End Democracy: Christian Nationalists

by Scott Robinson.    Read more

They Long to End Democracy: The Oligarchy

by Scott Robinson.    Read more

 

PLUTOCRATIC, OLIGARCHIC TAKEOVER OF US
“Wealthy Donors Bankroll Christian Nationalists to Sustain Unregulated Capitalism”   By Nicholas Powers.  Truthout (August 15, 2022).  Funded by a 1 percent of megadonors and corporations, the religious right has grown to a grotesque size.   [This is a wide-ranging report on the Republican Party values and behaviors of the ultra-wealthy.  --D]  “The reality is that some of the richest people and corporations in the world bankroll Christian nationalists who, in turn, attack the already limited freedoms of poor people, people of color, women and LGBTQ people in the name of God. Yet the wealthy and the politicians they pay often break the very biblical codes they make into law. Now the danger has intensified. A Republican White House, Senate, House and Supreme Court can overturn democracy and replace it with a Christian nationalist state, fueled by ultra-wealthy donors who see attacks on fundamental rights as handy tools in securing their power.”

Plutocratic Takeover of US, Project 2025, Versus Jesus, Adam Smith, FDR, via Christian Nationalism

Bruce Gourley.   “Plutocratic Theocracy: How an alliance of extreme market capitalists and Christian Nationalists is working to remake American society.”  Church and State Magazine (December 2, 2024)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Americans United, while not taking a position on economic policies, is actively fighting against the Shadow Network, a “clandestine web of Christian Nationalist organizations, conservative billionaires and powerful political allies at all levels of government” working to “upend democracy and equality by undermining the separation of church and state.” This is the backstory of the economic and Christian currents that ultimately produced the Shadow Network.   In the heart of the Great Depression in 1934, Dr. Eli Ginzberg, a young economics professor, weighed in on President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s transformative fiscal agenda.   Overwhelmingly elected to the presidency two years earlier and already beloved by a great majority of Americans, Roosevelt, during a period of 25% unemployment, had steered the federal government into previously uncharted territory: the creation of federally funded social safety nets for financially disadvantaged citizens, including public service works jobs and housing assistance. He had also announced his intention to establish a social safety net for aged citizens. (This would come to pass with the Social Security Act of 1936). Big business interests and many wealthy Americans complained that FDR had abandoned capitalism for socialism or even communism. Ginzberg, though, knew better.

During the 1920s, Presidents Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover had essentially turned the federal government over to corporations, dramatically cutting taxes on wealthy Americans and declaring victory, even as some one-half of all Americans remained in poverty. Corporations drove up profits by creating installment plans for middle-class customers, driving consumer debt to unprecedented levels.

The resulting inequality led to the stock market crash in 1929 and the Great Depression. Confident that inequitable capitalism would correct the economy, Hoover nonetheless bailed out banks and railroads. At the same time, he turned a cold shoulder to ordinary Americans, ignoring pleas to use federal coffers to ease the dire plight of the millions of unemployed, homeless and destitute. Trounced in his 1932 re-election bid, Hoover argued that his failed economic policies adhered to Adam Smith’s classic 1776 tome, Wealth of Nations.  
In 1934, economist Ginzberg in a New York Times article set the record straight. Smith’s Wealth of Nations, Ginzberg admonished, “is not a justification of modern [plutocratic] capitalism.” In addition, the economist continued, “[H]ad Adam Smith been afforded the opportunity to review the problems of corporate enterprise in 1931,” he wrote in his book The House of Adam Smith, “there is little doubt that his general approach would have been the same as in 1776: namely, a preoccupation with the public welfare.”  
In fact, Smith, considered the father of capitalism, approached economics from the perspective of the common good. In Wealth of Nations he identified greed as the greatest impediment to national prosperity. Seeking to banish extreme wealth inequality, Smith advocated for higher tax rates for wealthy persons, government regulations of businesses and banks, and restrictions on how much family wealth could be passed from generation to generation. He also advocated for what we now call living wages. “A man must always live by his work, and his wages must at least be sufficient to maintain him,” Smith wrote. “They must even upon most occasions be somewhat more; otherwise it would be impossible for him to bring up a family, and the race of such workmen could not last beyond the first generation.”Smith was critical of excessive commercial profits: “[Businessmen] complain much about the bad effects of high wages in raising the price, and thereby lessening the sale of their goods, [but] they, say nothing concerning the bad effects of high profits.” To level the economic playing field, “[t]he rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in proportion.”
In short, Smith opposed unfettered capitalism, instead proposing an empathetic system of capitalism that prevented massive, nation-destroying wealth gaps between the rich and the poor. For his part, Ginzberg in 1934 noted that Smith’s Wealth of Nations “like the New Deal … seeks a general redistribution of wealth.” Smith’s empathetic capitalism was designed to prevent poverty. In his own words, Roosevelt noted his objective in emulating Smithian capitalism was to “save the people and the nation” from the economic failures of the plutocracy-focused [rule by the wealthy] presidencies of Coolidge and Hoover. . . .   MORE 
https://www.au.org/about-au/people/bruce-gourley/

In the intertwined world of plutocracy and Christian Nationalism that is today’s United States,  the empathetic capitalism of Adam Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt is no more. Absent, too, from Christian Nationalism is the inclusive, compassionate and empathetic Jesus of the gospels.    In 2025, plutocratic theocracy is poised to assault America’s constitutional foundation of church-state separation as never before through the implementation of their extremist Project 2025 agenda.

 

AND CONTROL OF THE SUPREME COURT

SIX JUSTICES OF THE US SUPREME COURT
Bruce Gourley.  “Supreme Theocrats: Christian Nationalists on the Nation’s Highest Court.”  Cover story of Church and State (Sept. 2024).   Supreme theocrats: The anti-freedom, anti-life, biblical worldview of the Christian Nationalist majority on the nation’s highest court.”

The Six: Alito, Coney Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Thomas—and Roberts, who voted to reverse Roe.  [Excellent summary plus analysis of each.  –Dick]   https://www.au.org/the-latest/church-and-state/articles/supreme-theocrats-the-anti-freedom-anti-life-biblical-worldview-of-the-christian-nationalist-majority-on-the-nations-highest-court/

 

TAKING ACTION

Star-Spangled Jesus: Leaving Christian Nationalism and Finding A True FaithBy April Ajoy.  Hatchette, 2024.

Publisher’s Description
A hilarious and eye-opening account of leaving Christian Nationalism behind to follow Jesus better.

April Ajoy wouldn’t have called herself a Christian Nationalist when she performed her original song “America Say Jesus” on the Jim Bakker show, or when she participated in Jesus Marches across America, or when she posted cringe-worthy videos on YouTube to campaign for Mitt Romney. April just considered herself a good Christian: faithful, Republican, and determined to make America a Christian nation once again.
 
But as her view of the world widened, Ajoy began to see cracks in her steadfast beliefs and recognized the ways her conservative politics and religion were intertwined in her mind. Did God really bless America? Is it actually by His red, white, and blue stripes that we are healed?
 
Ajoy, content creator and podcast host, shares funny stories from her time deep within Christian nationalism, exploring how aspects of evangelical culture such as product boycotts, Satanic panic, and end-times theology have all been exploited to advance the Christian Nationalist narrative. She also illuminates the ways nationalist thinking has infiltrated our churches and political arenas, shaping not only modern evangelical culture but also American public policy and international relations.

Part memoir, part guidebook, part call to action, Star-Spangled Jesus explores how the fight to make America a “Christian nation” has damaged us all and shows how one woman left Christian Nationalism and why America should too.
 

 

Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers
Guide to Action Recommended by John Hubbel Weiss
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025, 9:33 PM John Hubbel Weiss <jhw4@cornell.edu> wrote:
For at least the second time since September, the national media have warned about the threat of Christian nationalism.  It’s time to inform ourselves and take action, folks. . . .

 I offer the excellent guide to action published by Faithful America, Christian nationalists’  major adversary, as you will find in the link below.  I recommend especially the book by Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers($13.49 from Thriftbooks).  https://act.faithfulamerica.org/signup/christian-nationalism-resources/

  

Below that is a CNN story featuring the most recently published work on the movement by Kristin Du Mez. Haven’t read that one yet, but it does bring to mind that Trump’s current candidate for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, is an active Christian nationalist. As is Michael Flynn, Trump’s national security advisor in his first term.    

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/12/us/white-christian-nationalism-du-mez-cec/index.html

 

 

 Bruce Gourley.  “Authentic Dialogue….”  Church and State (Nov. 2024).

“You probably know someone ensnared in Christian Nationalism.  Real communication is the first step to guiding them out.”

 

 

How to End Christian Nationalism By Amanda Tyler.  Broadleaf Books, 2024. 
Publisher’s description: 
The essential guidebook for Christians alarmed by the rising tide of Christian nationalism yet unsure how to counter it.

Christian nationalism is a powerful and pervasive ideology, and it is becoming normalized. From Amanda Tyler, lead organizer of the Christians Against Christian Nationalism campaign, comes How to End Christian Nationalism, your vital companion for countering this dangerous ideology. Tyler draws on her experiences, conversations with pastors and laypeople, research, Scripture, her Baptist convictions, and her work as a constitutional law expert to help us confront Christian nationalist fervor.

You'll learn how to distinguish Christian nationalism from the teachings of Jesus and to demonstrate how the former perpetuates white supremacy. This book also unpacks key truths we can share with others: Patriotism is not the same as nationalism. Religious freedom means little if it's not for everyone. Christians follow a gospel of love, not the idol of power.

Here, you'll find stories of what Christians are doing to resist Christian nationalism in their churches and communities, plus ideas for your own work. From strategies for faith-rooted organizing to guidance for holding hard conversations with loved ones, Tyler offers practical ways to protect faith freedom for all. With precision and compassion, Tyler offers cogent arguments for the separation of church and state, a timely call to action, and an urgent case for replacing a twisted, fearful version of faith with one that is good and right and true. We've all seen what Christian nationalism can do. Now is the time for Christians to reckon with its harm. Now is the time to end it.

Endorsements
"White Christian nationalism is the greatest threat to democracy and the witness of the church in the United States today. But we are not powerless, and How to End Christian Nationalism is a potent tool for taking action."  Jemar TisbyNew York Times bestselling author of The Color of Compromise.
"Amanda Tyler gives all Americans--but especially serious Christians like herself--the means of constitutional, theological, political, and psychological self-defense against the toxic ideology of white Christian nationalism. Anyone who has wondered about the relationship between this surging fanaticism and what happened on January 6 should look no further."  Jamie Raskin, US representative for Maryland's 8th cong. District.
"How to End Christian Nationalism is the perfect book for anyone confused about Christian nationalism and wondering what they can do about it. All American Christians who love their country would do well to read this book and take its lessons to heart."  Kristin Kobes Du Mez, author of Jesus and John Wayne.
"Amanda Tyler is a powerful sister who has led Christians in a movement to counter the religious nationalists who do so much evil in God's name. May this resource help others learn from her experience and wisdom."  William J. Barber II, co-chair of Poor People's Campaign and author of White Poverty and other books.
"An indispensable tool in renewing civic engagement and democracy in America in these polarizing times. With the rise of theocratic and authoritarian organizations, How to End Christian Nationalism is a foundational text for anyone who cares not only about America's past but about its future."  Anthea Butler, author of White Evangelical Racism and chair of religious studies at the University of Pennsylvania.
"To achieve our potential as a country, we must welcome the contributions of people of all faiths and none, and strengthen the bonds between them. To do that, we must defeat the scourge of Christian nationalism. This book will show you how."    Eboo Patel, founder and president of Interfaith America and author of We Need to Build.
"With the precision of an attorney and the practicality of an organizer and advocate, Amanda Tyler helps us see what we can do to defeat the biggest threat to American democracy today: white Christian nationalism. This timely and insightful book does more than just sound the alarm; it passionately lays out a call to action."  Robert P. JonesNew York Times bestselling author of The Hidden Roots of White Supremacy.

"Essential reading for those of us who seek to follow Jesus in the Way. Amanda Tyler is clear, focused, learned, and passionate in defining Christian nationalism as the threat it is--to democracy and to the faith of Jesus--and providing a map to end the grip it has on too much of our nation. White Christians are a key audience here, but Christians of every ethnicity can learn from this important text."  Jacqui Lewis, senior minister and public theologian at Middle Collegiate Church.

"Amanda Tyler seamlessly weaves history with modern statistics and polling data to illustrate how Christian nationalism perverts Scripture into a tool to build power and justify political violence. The book offers a sound prescription for challenging the extremist ideology that has infected America's politics in a particularly critical time."

Mary B. McCord, executive director of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection.
"Using stories from her own life and insight gained from decades of political activism for a gospel based on justice and equality, Tyler offers a plea to all Christians to do the work of joining diverse coalitions of Americans who will stand together against Christian nationalism. There is no one more equipped to offer strategies for combating one of the gravest threats to our democracy."  Bradley Onishi, author of Preparing for War and president of the Institute for Religion, Media, and Civic Engagement
Reviews
"[An] energetic debut. . . . Tyler effectively sounds the alarm on the rising threat of Christian nationalism and its harms to both the church and the country."   Publishers Weekly
"Tyler fervently advocates for dialogue in undoing the possibly destructive influence of a fundamentalist ideology. Each chapter provides a tactful approach to rolling back the harm (and potential harm) done by words and actions guided by Christian Nationalism. . . . A significant book for 2024 and beyond."   Booklist

 

Robert Edwards.  Resisting the Right: How to Survive the Gathering Storm.  OR Books, 2024.  “Edwards gives us an invaluable ‘survey of pro-democracy measures” (Carroll in his Foreword).   19 chapters survey the expansion of right wing politics and what is needed to block each breach of the democratic idea.   Chapter 15, titled “In Gods We Trust,” describes the merging of authoritarian politics with national religious identify and how we might resume and even widen their separation.

 

 

OMNI Anthology #1:  https://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2024/02/omni-white-christian-nationalism.html

 

OMNI WHITE CHRISTIAN, PLUTOCRATIC, OLIGARCHIC, THEOCRATIC, FUNDAMENTALIST NATIONALISM ANTHOLOGY, #2 February 20, 2025

$
0
0

 

OMNI

WHITE CHRISTIAN, PLUTOCRATIC, OLIGARCHIC, THEOCRATIC, FUNDAMENTALIST NATIONALISM ANTHOLOGY, #2

 February 20, 2025

Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace, Justice, and Ecology

https://omnicenter.org/donate

 

What’s at Stake:   Christian nationalism radically shapes what Americans think about who they are as a people, what their future should look like, and how they should get there.”  Andrew Whitehead.

 

CONTENTS

Local Connection:  FFRF Chapter Actions.

 

History

Whitehead.  Taking America Back for God.

Onishi.  Preparing for W ar: The Extremist History of White Christian Nationalism.
Seidel.  “The Shadow Network, Project 2025….”
Seidel.   “Church-state separation and. . .Christian Nationalist abuse of power.”
 

Taylor.  The Violent Take It by Force.

Du Mez.  Jesus and John Wayne.

History, Analysis, Action

American Christian Nationalism: Neither American nor Christian by Michael W. Austin.

Andrew Whitehead.  American Idolatry.  

Scott Robinson.  The Three Main Enemies of Democracy.  3 books on the Republican Party, Christian Nationalists, and the Oligarchy.

 Plutocracy and CN
Nicholas Powers.  “Wealthy Donors Bankroll Christian Nationalists to    Sustain Unregulated Capitalism.”    
Bruce Gourley.  Plutocratic Theocracy: How an alliance of extreme market capitalists    and Christian Nationalists is working to remake American society.”

Supreme Court

Gourley.  “Supreme Theocrats.”

 

TAKING ACTION

Ajoy.  Star-Spangled Jesus.

Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers
How to End Christian Nationalism By Amanda Tyler. 

Bruce Gourley.  “Authentic Dialogue….”

Robert Edwards.  Resisting the Right.

 

Christian Nationalism Anthology #1

 

 

 

TEXTS

Local Connection

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION,  A NATIONAL AND LOCAL BULWARK AGAINST Plutocratic, Oligarchic Fascism with an Ozarks Chapter, February 2025 Newsletter.
Ozarks Chapter of Freedom From Religion Foundation <contact@zeffy.com>

Feb 17, 2025         

Hello Dick, and Happy President's Day,

Whew....where to start....Legislators are trying to ramrod religion (chaplains) into classrooms, the US President is allocating resources to root out anti-Christian bias (what!?!?) and politicians are drafting policy to make it near impossible for citizen led ballot initiatives.  In my 43+ years, I've never seen the pillars of Democracy come under such intense pressure, and it feels like the time we're living in now is a tipping point.  I hope that by connecting with reasonable and rational citizens, including those who embrace religion, we can coalesce and stamp down the Christian Nationalism that is being injected into our lives daily.  Secular citizens must be proactive in this effort!

 

PLEASE TAKE ACTION!!!  BEGINNING THIS WEEK, FEBRUARY 17th: 

Six bills are running through the Arkansas General Assembly that would add even more barriers for citizens to take part in direct democracy. Please leave a message for your Senator at 501-682-2902 and your Representative at 501-682-6211 and ask them to vote against Senate Bills 207 through 212.

·SB207 would scare away people from signing ballot measure petitions by requiring canvassers to talk about criminal penalties for fraud. People already know fraud is illegal.

SB208 would require that canvassers check the ID of voters before allowing them to sign. This is merely an attempt to slow the signature gathering process.

SB209 would throw out legitimate signatures of voters for wrongdoing by canvassers. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

SB210 would require canvassers to watch a voter read the ballot measure or read the ballot measure out loud to a voter before collecting the signature. Canvassers are already required to carry copies of the measure that people can read. The Secretary of State’s office said the reading of the longest recent ballot measure would take eight minutes — another strategy to deter people from signing a ballot measure petition.

SB211 would create red tape that would make it harder for ballot measure campaigns to collect signatures. There is already a dizzying amount of red tape in the signature collection process.

SB212 would create a “Document Validity Division” — a law enforcement agency of the Secretary of State. But the office already reviews the validity of documents and can refer potential lawbreakers to prosecutors. It would just create more bureaucracy and complicated legal questions.

Speak up for the constitutional rights of voters. Call your Senator and Representative now ask them to vote against Senate Bills 207 through 212!

 

Senate at 501-682-2902

House of Representatives at 501-682-6211

 

In other news, the Ozarks Chapter continues to put together an exciting lineup of events, activities and speaking engagements.  Last month, our chapter contributed over 16 man hours to help the NWA Women's Shelter Thrift Store sort through incoming donations, rack clothing and assist with light cleaning duties.  The employees were very appreciative of our help, and the GM reached out afterwards to let me know how valuable our work is in protecting the separation between church and state

 

HISTORY

Taking America Back for God: Christian Nationalism in the United States by Andrew L. Whitehead.   Oxford UP, 2020.

Abstract

Taking America Back for God conclusively reveals that understanding the current cultural and political climate in the United States requires reckoning with Christian nationalism. Christian ideals and symbols have long played an important role in public life in the United States, but Christian nationalism demands far more than a recognition of religious heritage. At heart, Christian nationalism fights to preserve a particular kind of social order, an order in which everyone—Christians and non-Christians, native-born and immigrants, whites and minorities, men and women—recognizes their “proper” place in society. The first comprehensive empirical analysis of Christian nationalism in the United States, Taking America Back for God illustrates the scope and tremendous influence of Christian nationalism on debates surrounding the most contentious social issues dominating American public discourse. Drawing on multiple sources of national survey data collected over the past several decades and in-depth interviews, Whitehead and Perry document how Christian nationalism radically shapes what Americans think about who they are as a people, what their future should look like, and how they should get there. Regardless of Americans’ political or religious characteristics, whether they are Ambassadors, Accommodators, Resisters, or Rejecters of Christian nationalism provides powerful insight into what they think about immigration, Muslims, gun control, police shootings, atheists, gender roles, and many other political issues—even who they want in the White House. Taking America Back for God convincingly shows how Christian nationalists’ desire for political power, rigid social boundaries, and hierarchical order creates significant consequences for all Americans.

Keywords: Christian nationalismreligionpoliticsUnited StatesracegenderDonald Trumpimmigrationsexuality

 

 

War on Democracy:  Origin of INSURRECTION JANUARY 6, 2021, Civil War?

Bradley Onishi.  Preparing for War: The Extremist History of White Christian Nationalism.   2023. 
The events of January 6, 2021, shocked the nation and the world. But to those who lived through White Christian nationalism, consumed its media, and practiced its teachings, the Insurrection was the logical outcome of a seventy-five-year war on American democracy.

Despite a growing body of literature that analyzes White Christian nationalism in the United States, there are no works that bring together firsthand accounts of the decades-long culture wars that set the stage for the violent White Christian nationalism plaguing the country with historical analyses of the events, leaders, and communities that prepared the troops and led the charge. PREPARING FOR WAR uses Onishi’s lived experience as an Evangelical insider as a prism for understanding the violence and extremism of the White Christian nationalists at the center of our current political moment. It asks: How did the rise of the Religious Right, from 1964-2015, eventually give birth to violent White Christian nationalism during the Trump presidency and beyond? What are the foundational components of the “alternative” worldview that propelled some of the most conservative religious communities in the country to ignite a cold civil war? How can the history of the Religious Right provide a basis for anticipating how White Christian nationalism will bear on our public square in the years to come?

 In this compelling and scholarly mix of memoir and cultural and political history, Onishi brings to bear his experience as a former Christian nationalist movement insider to expose the radicalism behind the January 6th insurrection. Gripping and essential reading for anyone who wants to understand the threat that This movement poses to American democracy.” – Katherine Stewart, Author of The Power Worshippers: Inside the Dangerous World of Religious Nationalism

Preparing for War, Bradley Onishi traces the history of White Christian Nationalism from the John Birch Society to the Big Lie and the January 6 terrorist assault on the U.S. Capitol, a narrative enlivened by the author’s own occasional intersections with the movement. This is an excellent and important book, both chilling and prophetic.” – Randall Balmer Professor of Religion, Dartmouth College and Author of Bad Faith: Race and the Rise of the Religious Right

Onishi takes us on a sweeping yet personal journey through modern American religious and political history to understand the violent, extremist strains of white Christian America that led to the January 6th insurrection. With insight from hundreds of interviews, deep scholarship, and his own escape from white Christian Nationalism, Onishi’s Preparing for War is a clear account of what happened and clarion warning about what is coming. Compelling and timely.” – Andrew Seidel, Constitutional Lawyer at Americans United and author of American Crusade: How the Supreme Court Is Weaponizing Religious Freedom.
 

The Shadow Network of Christian Nationalism “is spreading into every facet of American life.” 
Andrew Seidel.  “The Shadow Network, Project 2025 and the Humongous Fungus.”  Church and State (Nov. 2024).

Alliance Defending Freedom.
Family Research Council
First Liberty Institute
American Center for Law and Justice

 

Andrew Seidel.  “Church-state separation and the Big Lebowski: The Christian Nationalist abuse of power.”  Church and State (Nov. 2024).  Reports the work of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, integral to “defending our democracy.”

 

TRUMP AND CHRISTIAN NATIONALISM

The Violent Take It by Force: The Christian Movement That Is Threatening Our Democracy By Matthew D. Taylor.  Broadleaf, 2024. 
Publisher’s description:
"Required reading for anyone seeking to understand Christian nationalism."—Kristin Kobes Du Mez, author of Jesus and John Wayne

A propulsive account of the network of charismatic Christians that consolidated support for Donald Trump and is reshaping religion and politics in the US.

Over the last decade, the Religious Right has evolved. Some of the more extreme beliefs of American evangelicalism have begun to take hold in the mainstream. Scholar Matthew D. Taylor pulls back the curtain on a little-known movement of evangelical Christians who see themselves waging spiritual battles on a massive scale. Known as the New Apostolic Reformation, this network of leaders and believers emerged only three decades ago but now yields colossal influence, galvanizing support for Trump and far-right leaders around the world. In this groundbreaking account, Taylor explores the New Apostolic Reformation from its inception in the work of a Fuller Seminary professor, to its immense networks of apostles and prophets, to its role in the January 6 riot. Charismatic faith provided righteous fuel to the fire that day, where symbols of spiritual warfare blazed: rioters blew shofars, worship music blared, and people knelt in prayer. This vision of charismatic Christianity now animates millions, lured by Spirit-filled revival and visions of Christian supremacy.

Taylor's unprecedented access to the movement's leaders, archives, internal conference calls, and correspondence gives us an insider account of the connection between charismatic evangelicalism and hard-right rhetoric. Taylor delves into prophetic memes like the Seven Mountains Mandate, the Appeal to Heaven flag, and the Cyrus Anointing; Trump's spiritual advisor Paula White's call for "angelic reinforcements"; and Sean Feucht and Bethel Music's titanic command of worship styles across America. Throughout, Taylor maps a movement of magnetic leaders and their uncompromising beliefs--and where it might be headed next. When people long to conquer a nation for God, democracy can be brought to the brink.

Endorsements
"Matthew D. Taylor's work is a gift. He has given us an empathetic, fair-minded, highly intelligent, and eminently readable story that explains one of the most important religious movements in modern America. Most people don't even know what the New Apostolic Reformation is, much less that it has been a driving force of Christian TrumpismThe Violent Take It by Force will change that."  --Jon Ward, author of Testimony and Camelot's End
 For more endorsements go to:     https://www.broadleafbooks.com/store/product/9781506497785/The-Violent-Take-It-by-Force

 Kristin Kobes Du Mez.   Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation.   Liveright, 2020.

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER  The “paradigm-influencing” book (Christianity Today) that is fundamentally transforming our understanding of white evangelicalism in America.

Jesus and John Wayne is a sweeping, revisionist history of the last seventy-five years of white evangelicalism, revealing how evangelicals have worked to replace the Jesus of the Gospels with an idol of rugged masculinity and Christian nationalism—or in the words of one modern chaplain, with “a spiritual badass.”  As acclaimed scholar Kristin Du Mez explains, the key to understanding this transformation is to recognize the centrality of popular culture in contemporary American evangelicalism. Many of today’s evangelicals might not be theologically astute, but they know their VeggieTales, they’ve read John Eldredge’s Wild at Heart, and they learned about purity before they learned about sex—and they have a silver ring to prove it. Evangelical books, films, music, clothing, and merchandise shape the beliefs of millions. And evangelical culture is teeming with muscular heroes—mythical warriors and rugged soldiers, men like Oliver North, Ronald Reagan, Mel Gibson, and the Duck Dynasty clan, who assert white masculine power in defense of “Christian America.” Chief among these evangelical legends is John Wayne, an icon of a lost time when men were uncowed by political correctness, unafraid to tell it like it was, and did what needed to be done.

Challenging the commonly held assumption that the “moral majority” backed Donald Trump in 2016 and 2020 for purely pragmatic reasons, Du Mez reveals that Trump in fact represented the fulfillment, rather than the betrayal, of white evangelicals’ most deeply held values: patriarchy, authoritarian rule, aggressive foreign policy, fear of Islam, ambivalence toward #MeToo, and opposition to Black Lives Matter and the LGBTQ community. A much-needed reexamination of perhaps the most influential subculture in this country, Jesus and John Wayne shows that, far from adhering to biblical principles, modern white evangelicals have remade their faith, with enduring consequences for all Americans.

Kristin Kobes Du Mez is a professor of history at Calvin University and the author of A New Gospel for Women. Learn More

 

INTRODUCTION:  HISTORY, ANALYSIS, ACTION

American Christian Nationalism: Neither American nor Christian by Michael W. Austin.  Foreword by Marlena Graves.  Eerdmans, 2024.  130 Pages.     DOWNLOAD BOOK FLYER

Description  Contents  Author  Praise
Publisher’s Description
Michael W. Austin shows how nationalism is contrary to American values and Christian virtues—and offers us a better form of civic engagement.
In this brief, thought-provoking book, Michael W. Austin turns his keen mind for ethics toward the crisis currently facing our democracy: the rise of American Christian nationalism. Austin first accessibly explains the meaning and history behind nationalism. He then systematically shows how the ideology contradicts American values like liberty, equality, and justice as well as Christian virtues like humility, faith, hope, and love. Ultimately, he argues that the Beloved Community, first developed by Martin Luther King Jr. and others, offers a better model for an authentically Christian and American community. Readers frustrated by partisan strife will find a faithful guide in Austin’s thoughtful volume.

 

CHRISTIAN NATIONALISM V. GOSPEL CHRISTIANITY

Andrew Whitehead.  American Idolatry: How Christian Nationalism Betrays the Gospel and Threatens the Church.   Baker Books, 2023.

What the book is about

Explores how Christian nationalism harms American Christianity. 

Identifies three idols of Christian nationalism that Whitehead believes corrupt American Christianity: power, fear, and violence. He argues that these idols threaten the spiritual lives of American Christians and the church. 

What the book's arguments are 

Christian nationalism weakens the church by stirring up fear of others instead of encouraging peacemaking, hope, and love.

Violence is a natural result of constantly stoking fear and threat.

The use of violence signals a distrust of God's work in the world and seeing the image of God in all people.


Review of American Idolatry.  Foreword Reviews   https://www.forewordreviews.com › ... › Religion. 
 Aug 15, 2023 — Sociologist Andrew L. Whitehead's American Idolatry is a fascinating investigation of politics and racism in American Christian evangelicalism.

 

ANALYSIS OF 3 ANTI-DEMOCRATIC FORCES
They Long to End Democracy .  3 book series by Scott Robinson.  Paperback Edition 2024.

There are three organizations in the United State that have all, in recent years, signaled and even said outright that Democracy's day is done in the United States - and each is poised to replace it.

These groups include the Grand Old Party - US Republicans, who have declared for almost two decades now their desire to install a "permanent majority"; the Christian Nationalists, Evangelicals who have believed since the mid-Seventies that the United States should be a theocracy, not a democracy, with their own people in charge; and the oligarchy, a network of ultra-wealthy citizens - the top 1% of the top 1% - who have labored for decades to supplant the New Deal framework of the United States with a neoliberal one more favorable to their interests.

This series of short books presents overviews of all three of these groups - who they are, what they're about, and how they intend to go about implementing their own visions of American governance.

Read more

All titles below are free to borrow with a Kindle Unlimited subscription. View the Kindle Edition of this series to see the eligible titles.

Books in this series (3 books)

They Long to End Democracy: The GOPby Scott Robinson.

Read moreBottom of Form

They Long to End Democracy: Christian Nationalists

by Scott Robinson.    Read more

They Long to End Democracy: The Oligarchy

by Scott Robinson.    Read more

 

PLUTOCRATIC, OLIGARCHIC TAKEOVER OF US
“Wealthy Donors Bankroll Christian Nationalists to Sustain Unregulated Capitalism”   By Nicholas Powers.  Truthout (August 15, 2022).  Funded by a 1 percent of megadonors and corporations, the religious right has grown to a grotesque size.   [This is a wide-ranging report on the Republican Party values and behaviors of the ultra-wealthy.  --D]  “The reality is that some of the richest people and corporations in the world bankroll Christian nationalists who, in turn, attack the already limited freedoms of poor people, people of color, women and LGBTQ people in the name of God. Yet the wealthy and the politicians they pay often break the very biblical codes they make into law. Now the danger has intensified. A Republican White House, Senate, House and Supreme Court can overturn democracy and replace it with a Christian nationalist state, fueled by ultra-wealthy donors who see attacks on fundamental rights as handy tools in securing their power.”

Plutocratic Takeover of US, Project 2025, Versus Jesus, Adam Smith, FDR, via Christian Nationalism

Bruce Gourley.   “Plutocratic Theocracy: How an alliance of extreme market capitalists and Christian Nationalists is working to remake American society.”  Church and State Magazine (December 2, 2024)

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Americans United, while not taking a position on economic policies, is actively fighting against the Shadow Network, a “clandestine web of Christian Nationalist organizations, conservative billionaires and powerful political allies at all levels of government” working to “upend democracy and equality by undermining the separation of church and state.” This is the backstory of the economic and Christian currents that ultimately produced the Shadow Network.   In the heart of the Great Depression in 1934, Dr. Eli Ginzberg, a young economics professor, weighed in on President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s transformative fiscal agenda.   Overwhelmingly elected to the presidency two years earlier and already beloved by a great majority of Americans, Roosevelt, during a period of 25% unemployment, had steered the federal government into previously uncharted territory: the creation of federally funded social safety nets for financially disadvantaged citizens, including public service works jobs and housing assistance. He had also announced his intention to establish a social safety net for aged citizens. (This would come to pass with the Social Security Act of 1936). Big business interests and many wealthy Americans complained that FDR had abandoned capitalism for socialism or even communism. Ginzberg, though, knew better.

During the 1920s, Presidents Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover had essentially turned the federal government over to corporations, dramatically cutting taxes on wealthy Americans and declaring victory, even as some one-half of all Americans remained in poverty. Corporations drove up profits by creating installment plans for middle-class customers, driving consumer debt to unprecedented levels.

The resulting inequality led to the stock market crash in 1929 and the Great Depression. Confident that inequitable capitalism would correct the economy, Hoover nonetheless bailed out banks and railroads. At the same time, he turned a cold shoulder to ordinary Americans, ignoring pleas to use federal coffers to ease the dire plight of the millions of unemployed, homeless and destitute. Trounced in his 1932 re-election bid, Hoover argued that his failed economic policies adhered to Adam Smith’s classic 1776 tome, Wealth of Nations.  
In 1934, economist Ginzberg in a New York Times article set the record straight. Smith’s Wealth of Nations, Ginzberg admonished, “is not a justification of modern [plutocratic] capitalism.” In addition, the economist continued, “[H]ad Adam Smith been afforded the opportunity to review the problems of corporate enterprise in 1931,” he wrote in his book The House of Adam Smith, “there is little doubt that his general approach would have been the same as in 1776: namely, a preoccupation with the public welfare.”  
In fact, Smith, considered the father of capitalism, approached economics from the perspective of the common good. In Wealth of Nations he identified greed as the greatest impediment to national prosperity. Seeking to banish extreme wealth inequality, Smith advocated for higher tax rates for wealthy persons, government regulations of businesses and banks, and restrictions on how much family wealth could be passed from generation to generation. He also advocated for what we now call living wages. “A man must always live by his work, and his wages must at least be sufficient to maintain him,” Smith wrote. “They must even upon most occasions be somewhat more; otherwise it would be impossible for him to bring up a family, and the race of such workmen could not last beyond the first generation.”Smith was critical of excessive commercial profits: “[Businessmen] complain much about the bad effects of high wages in raising the price, and thereby lessening the sale of their goods, [but] they, say nothing concerning the bad effects of high profits.” To level the economic playing field, “[t]he rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in proportion.”
In short, Smith opposed unfettered capitalism, instead proposing an empathetic system of capitalism that prevented massive, nation-destroying wealth gaps between the rich and the poor. For his part, Ginzberg in 1934 noted that Smith’s Wealth of Nations “like the New Deal … seeks a general redistribution of wealth.” Smith’s empathetic capitalism was designed to prevent poverty. In his own words, Roosevelt noted his objective in emulating Smithian capitalism was to “save the people and the nation” from the economic failures of the plutocracy-focused [rule by the wealthy] presidencies of Coolidge and Hoover. . . .   MORE 
https://www.au.org/about-au/people/bruce-gourley/

In the intertwined world of plutocracy and Christian Nationalism that is today’s United States,  the empathetic capitalism of Adam Smith and Franklin D. Roosevelt is no more. Absent, too, from Christian Nationalism is the inclusive, compassionate and empathetic Jesus of the gospels.    In 2025, plutocratic theocracy is poised to assault America’s constitutional foundation of church-state separation as never before through the implementation of their extremist Project 2025 agenda.

 

AND CONTROL OF THE SUPREME COURT

SIX JUSTICES OF THE US SUPREME COURT
Bruce Gourley.  “Supreme Theocrats: Christian Nationalists on the Nation’s Highest Court.”  Cover story of Church and State (Sept. 2024).   Supreme theocrats: The anti-freedom, anti-life, biblical worldview of the Christian Nationalist majority on the nation’s highest court.”

The Six: Alito, Coney Barrett, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Thomas—and Roberts, who voted to reverse Roe.  [Excellent summary plus analysis of each.  –Dick]   https://www.au.org/the-latest/church-and-state/articles/supreme-theocrats-the-anti-freedom-anti-life-biblical-worldview-of-the-christian-nationalist-majority-on-the-nations-highest-court/

 

TAKING ACTION

Star-Spangled Jesus: Leaving Christian Nationalism and Finding A True FaithBy April Ajoy.  Hatchette, 2024.

Publisher’s Description
A hilarious and eye-opening account of leaving Christian Nationalism behind to follow Jesus better.

April Ajoy wouldn’t have called herself a Christian Nationalist when she performed her original song “America Say Jesus” on the Jim Bakker show, or when she participated in Jesus Marches across America, or when she posted cringe-worthy videos on YouTube to campaign for Mitt Romney. April just considered herself a good Christian: faithful, Republican, and determined to make America a Christian nation once again.
 
But as her view of the world widened, Ajoy began to see cracks in her steadfast beliefs and recognized the ways her conservative politics and religion were intertwined in her mind. Did God really bless America? Is it actually by His red, white, and blue stripes that we are healed?
 
Ajoy, content creator and podcast host, shares funny stories from her time deep within Christian nationalism, exploring how aspects of evangelical culture such as product boycotts, Satanic panic, and end-times theology have all been exploited to advance the Christian Nationalist narrative. She also illuminates the ways nationalist thinking has infiltrated our churches and political arenas, shaping not only modern evangelical culture but also American public policy and international relations.

Part memoir, part guidebook, part call to action, Star-Spangled Jesus explores how the fight to make America a “Christian nation” has damaged us all and shows how one woman left Christian Nationalism and why America should too.
 

 

Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers
Guide to Action Recommended by John Hubbel Weiss
On Sun, Jan 12, 2025, 9:33 PM John Hubbel Weiss <jhw4@cornell.edu> wrote:
For at least the second time since September, the national media have warned about the threat of Christian nationalism.  It’s time to inform ourselves and take action, folks. . . .

 I offer the excellent guide to action published by Faithful America, Christian nationalists’  major adversary, as you will find in the link below.  I recommend especially the book by Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers($13.49 from Thriftbooks).  https://act.faithfulamerica.org/signup/christian-nationalism-resources/

  

Below that is a CNN story featuring the most recently published work on the movement by Kristin Du Mez. Haven’t read that one yet, but it does bring to mind that Trump’s current candidate for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, is an active Christian nationalist. As is Michael Flynn, Trump’s national security advisor in his first term.    

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/12/us/white-christian-nationalism-du-mez-cec/index.html

 

 

 Bruce Gourley.  “Authentic Dialogue….”  Church and State (Nov. 2024).

“You probably know someone ensnared in Christian Nationalism.  Real communication is the first step to guiding them out.”

 

 

How to End Christian Nationalism By Amanda Tyler.  Broadleaf Books, 2024. 
Publisher’s description: 
The essential guidebook for Christians alarmed by the rising tide of Christian nationalism yet unsure how to counter it.

Christian nationalism is a powerful and pervasive ideology, and it is becoming normalized. From Amanda Tyler, lead organizer of the Christians Against Christian Nationalism campaign, comes How to End Christian Nationalism, your vital companion for countering this dangerous ideology. Tyler draws on her experiences, conversations with pastors and laypeople, research, Scripture, her Baptist convictions, and her work as a constitutional law expert to help us confront Christian nationalist fervor.

You'll learn how to distinguish Christian nationalism from the teachings of Jesus and to demonstrate how the former perpetuates white supremacy. This book also unpacks key truths we can share with others: Patriotism is not the same as nationalism. Religious freedom means little if it's not for everyone. Christians follow a gospel of love, not the idol of power.

Here, you'll find stories of what Christians are doing to resist Christian nationalism in their churches and communities, plus ideas for your own work. From strategies for faith-rooted organizing to guidance for holding hard conversations with loved ones, Tyler offers practical ways to protect faith freedom for all. With precision and compassion, Tyler offers cogent arguments for the separation of church and state, a timely call to action, and an urgent case for replacing a twisted, fearful version of faith with one that is good and right and true. We've all seen what Christian nationalism can do. Now is the time for Christians to reckon with its harm. Now is the time to end it.

Endorsements
"White Christian nationalism is the greatest threat to democracy and the witness of the church in the United States today. But we are not powerless, and How to End Christian Nationalism is a potent tool for taking action."  Jemar TisbyNew York Times bestselling author of The Color of Compromise.
"Amanda Tyler gives all Americans--but especially serious Christians like herself--the means of constitutional, theological, political, and psychological self-defense against the toxic ideology of white Christian nationalism. Anyone who has wondered about the relationship between this surging fanaticism and what happened on January 6 should look no further."  Jamie Raskin, US representative for Maryland's 8th cong. District.
"How to End Christian Nationalism is the perfect book for anyone confused about Christian nationalism and wondering what they can do about it. All American Christians who love their country would do well to read this book and take its lessons to heart."  Kristin Kobes Du Mez, author of Jesus and John Wayne.
"Amanda Tyler is a powerful sister who has led Christians in a movement to counter the religious nationalists who do so much evil in God's name. May this resource help others learn from her experience and wisdom."  William J. Barber II, co-chair of Poor People's Campaign and author of White Poverty and other books.
"An indispensable tool in renewing civic engagement and democracy in America in these polarizing times. With the rise of theocratic and authoritarian organizations, How to End Christian Nationalism is a foundational text for anyone who cares not only about America's past but about its future."  Anthea Butler, author of White Evangelical Racism and chair of religious studies at the University of Pennsylvania.
"To achieve our potential as a country, we must welcome the contributions of people of all faiths and none, and strengthen the bonds between them. To do that, we must defeat the scourge of Christian nationalism. This book will show you how."    Eboo Patel, founder and president of Interfaith America and author of We Need to Build.
"With the precision of an attorney and the practicality of an organizer and advocate, Amanda Tyler helps us see what we can do to defeat the biggest threat to American democracy today: white Christian nationalism. This timely and insightful book does more than just sound the alarm; it passionately lays out a call to action."  Robert P. JonesNew York Times bestselling author of The Hidden Roots of White Supremacy.

"Essential reading for those of us who seek to follow Jesus in the Way. Amanda Tyler is clear, focused, learned, and passionate in defining Christian nationalism as the threat it is--to democracy and to the faith of Jesus--and providing a map to end the grip it has on too much of our nation. White Christians are a key audience here, but Christians of every ethnicity can learn from this important text."  Jacqui Lewis, senior minister and public theologian at Middle Collegiate Church.

"Amanda Tyler seamlessly weaves history with modern statistics and polling data to illustrate how Christian nationalism perverts Scripture into a tool to build power and justify political violence. The book offers a sound prescription for challenging the extremist ideology that has infected America's politics in a particularly critical time."

Mary B. McCord, executive director of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection.
"Using stories from her own life and insight gained from decades of political activism for a gospel based on justice and equality, Tyler offers a plea to all Christians to do the work of joining diverse coalitions of Americans who will stand together against Christian nationalism. There is no one more equipped to offer strategies for combating one of the gravest threats to our democracy."  Bradley Onishi, author of Preparing for War and president of the Institute for Religion, Media, and Civic Engagement
Reviews
"[An] energetic debut. . . . Tyler effectively sounds the alarm on the rising threat of Christian nationalism and its harms to both the church and the country."   Publishers Weekly
"Tyler fervently advocates for dialogue in undoing the possibly destructive influence of a fundamentalist ideology. Each chapter provides a tactful approach to rolling back the harm (and potential harm) done by words and actions guided by Christian Nationalism. . . . A significant book for 2024 and beyond."   Booklist

 

Robert Edwards.  Resisting the Right: How to Survive the Gathering Storm.  OR Books, 2024.  “Edwards gives us an invaluable ‘survey of pro-democracy measures” (Carroll in his Foreword).   19 chapters survey the expansion of right wing politics and what is needed to block each breach of the democratic idea.   Chapter 15, titled “In Gods We Trust,” describes the merging of authoritarian politics with national religious identify and how we might resume and even widen their separation.

 

 

OMNI Anthology #1:  https://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2024/02/omni-white-christian-nationalism.html

 

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #219, February 24, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #219, February 24, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett.

 

Erald Kolasi .  The Physics of Capitalism: How a New Political Ecology Can Change the World
Genevieve Guenther.  The Language of Climate Politics: Fossil-Fuel Propaganda and How to Fight It. 

 

 

From Understanding to Action
The Physics of Capitalism: How a New Political Ecology Can Change the Worldby Erald Kolasi.  Monthly Review, 2025.
The Physics of Capitalism, by Erald Kolasi, offers a new theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between economic systems and the wider natural world.

 

The economic and demographic growth of human civilization over the last ten thousand years has profoundly impacted natural ecosystems throughout the planet, triggering major instabilities across the biosphere that threaten to reverberate on civilization and to destabilize its long-term trajectory.  Swamped with multiple ecological challenges of historic proportions, global civilization now stands at a critical tipping point that deserves closer scrutiny. If we are to have any hope of addressing the difficult challenges we face, then we must begin by understanding them and appreciating their complexity. And then, we must act.

 

 

 

The Language of Climate Politics: Fossil-Fuel Propaganda and How to Fight Itby Genevieve Guenther.

See all formats and editions
Publisher’s description:  
A groundbreaking investigation into the propaganda justifying the fossil-fuel economy, The Language of Climate Politics offers readers powerful new ways to talk about the climate crisis that will help create transformative change.

"If you want to understand the climate crisis and you only have time to read one book, this should be it." - Kieran Setiya, author of Life is Hard.

"A revelatory study...It's a breath of fresh air."Publishers' Weekly Starred Review

In an illuminating analysis, Dr. Genevieve Guenther shows that the climate debate is not, in fact, neatly polarized, with Republicans obstructing climate action and Democrats advancing climate solutions. Partisans on the right and the left often repeat the same fossil-fuel talking points, and this repetition produces a centrist consensus upholding the status quo, even as global heating accelerates.

Weaving this analysis through fascinating critical histories of the terms that dominate the language of climate politics―the words we, alarmist, cost, growth, "India and China," innovation, and resilience―Dr. Guenther shows how this consensus is established. Fossil-fuel interests weaponize the discourses of science, economics, and activism, co-opting and twisting climate language to help greenwash their plans for ongoing extraction. But all too often climate scientists, economists, and even advocates will unwittingly echo the false and dangerous assumptions of their supposed political opponents. This apparent agreement between foes, filtered through the news media, not only influences our common-sense yet mistaken views about the climate crisis but also enables powerful decisionmakers to justify the corporate and policy actions that threaten us all. Revealing this dynamic, Guenther shows how to transform it.

Ultimately, The Language of Climate Politics is an inspiring call to arms, a book that equips readers with powerful new terms that will enable them to fight more effectively for a livable future.

 

Send your comments to me directly by email.  J.dick.bennett@gmail.com

 

END OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #219, February 24, 2025.

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #218, FEBRUARY 26, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #218, FEBRUARY 26, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett 

Ukraine War: Truth of the Past Depends upon When you Begin and What’s Omitted

 Joe Lauria.  “Help Us Fight the Psyopcracy.”  Consortium News (6-24-24).

It’s not a physical enemy to combat but rather powerful messages lodged in millions of people’s minds. It’s come to rule over us. Read here...

June 22, 2024

Cathy Vogan, executive producer of Consortium News‘ webcast CN Live!, coined a new term to describe rule by psyops, or psychological operations: psyopcracy.   And Consortium News is devoted to fighting it.

According to Wikipedia  “Psychological operations (PSYOP) are operations to convey selected information and indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning, and ultimately the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and individuals.  The purpose of United States psychological operations is to induce or reinforce behavior perceived to be favorable to U.S. objectives. . . .”  Thus the American people are continuously subject to a number of psychological operations otherwise known as “the news.”  Combating these false constructs of the world through media is Consortium News‘ mission. . . .  [Lauria cites examples from the Vietnam War and ends with Ukraine and Gaza .]

The American people, and by extension people around the world, have been led to believe that an unprovoked Russian madman [Putin] started the war in Ukraine. That’s because they are purposely not told that the war actually began in 2014after a U.S.-backed coup in Kiev led Russian speakers in Donbass to declare independence, after which the coup government militarily attacked them.   Other facts are removed from the story, such as Russia’s proposed treaties with the U.S. and NATO in December 2021 that would have prevented Russia’s intervention in the Ukrainian civil war.   

The history of Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestine is also whitewashed to lead the U.S. public into believing that Israel is the “victim” that is only “defending itself.”

[I have cited Lauria’s important articles several times in WWW, and this article  deserves the highest recommendation.  Of course, in short pieces on large subjects an author must omit much more than he presents, and that carries the great danger of omitting essential history.  Much that Lauria writes about the US “psyopcracy” was foretold and analyzed by George Orwell in his novel 1984, and in the two decades of the 1970s and 80s and continuing by the Orwell/Doublespeak project of the National Council of Teachers of English with its Journal of Doublespeak, several books, and conferences.   --Dick].   

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #220, March 3, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #220, March 3, 2025.   Compiled by Dick Bennett

 

Global Affairs SmartBrief, Feb. 28, 2025.  2 Reports.

“Marine heatwaves surged in 2023-24, study shows.”

The frequency of marine heatwaves surged over the last two years, which saw ocean temperatures climb above normal levels for three-and-a-half times more days than in any previous year and close to 10% of ocean waters break heat records, a study published in Nature Climate Change indicates. Warmer waters can fuel more intense storms, spark coral bleaching, disrupt fishing and cause billions in damage, experts warn.    Full Story: The Guardian (London) (2/28) .
“57 Companies Are Responsible for 80% of Carbon Emissions That Cause Climate Change. “  A new study just revealed that 80% of climate change-causing emissions come from just 57 companies around the world. Chevron, ExxonMobile, BP, Aramco, Gazprom, and the National Iranian Oil Company are several of the largest contributors to continually skyrocketing greenhouse gasses. . . . Sign the petition to demand that Chevron, ExxonMobile, BP, Aramco, Gazprom, and the National Iranian Oil Company take responsibility for their carbon emissions and reverse their dangerous contributions now! We must speak out while we still have a planet to save!    Celeste, Care2 Petitions Team.  [Petitions—so easy sign on, and a venerablef feature of the idea of democracy--can help if enough reach their destination and there’s follow-up, but not if they distract us from working through other methods of protest also.  –D]
 

Chelsea Henderson.  Glacial: The Inside Story of Climate Politics.  Turner.   August 6, 2024.

Publisher’s description  It took nearly sixty years for a meaningful climate change bill to run the political gauntlet from Capitol Hill to the Oval Office. Why?

From mavericks to party standard-bearers, U.S. Senators, members of the House of Representatives, and presidential candidates have campaigned for four decades espousing their intentions to address the impacts of climate change.

Glacial: The Inside Story of Climate Politics is the first Inside-the-Beltway account to lay bare the machinations of what went wrong in Washington—how and why our leaders failed to act on climate change as mounting scientific evidence underscored the urgency to do so. Glacial tells a story of behind-the-scenes infighting and power struggles that blocked or derailed federal legislative progress on climate change, even in times of bipartisanship and with polls showing most Americans favored action.

The good news today is that public opinion is at its highest level of support for climate action, from corporate boardrooms embracing sustainability for business reasons to movements led by passionate younger generations who can't afford to stand mute because it is they who will inherit the worst environmental catastrophes. If the missed opportunities in Washington are instructive, the path to doing so is clear. Our elected officials must use their offices not solely for the power and prestige it bestows upon them personally, but for the public good—and they must do so while there is still time.


OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #219, MARCH 5, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #219, MARCH 5, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett

PREVENTING, STOPPING WARS

Rally for Palestine  Join Us Saturday, March 8, Court House, 1:00: Protest for Palestine!  Friendsofpalestinenwa   Mar 3, 2025    We invite you to stand with us in solidarity at an upcoming protest against the actions of Israel and the U.S., calling out the tactics of forced displacement and mass deportation that target refugees, migrants, and indigenous people.This is a crucial moment to raise our voices against injustice and advocate for the rights of those who are being forcibly displaced. Join us as we come together to demand change and show our support for Palestine and all affected communities.   Please spread the word and bring friends, family, and allies. Every voice matters!   In solidarity,   Friends of Palestine NWA

End the Empire
Claude Julien.  America’s Empire.  Pantheon, 1971.
Chapter One explains the rationale of the US “empire without frontiers,” and its Sovietphobia, militarism, wars, military-corporate complex, and propaganda machine. 
23 “…the internal prosperity of the United States depends in very large part on its freedom of access to the natural resources of the entire world, and more especially of the poor countries…the American economic empire is organized to protect and extend that freedom of access to the minerals and to the agricultural products of the Third World… .that position of privileged consumer.  And every day, considerable efforts are expended in maintaining and reinforce the positions already acquired.”
24 “The political, diplomatic, and military apparatus of the United States, the large American corporations as well as trade unions and, if need be, religious organizations all lend support to the same cause” of being the world’s largest consumer.
25- “And, naturally, it does not guarantee to all countries that freedom of access ‘on equal terms,’” particularly not to communist countries, since [speaking ironically], “communism remains the only real enemy of freedom.”   The rest of the chapter traces this dogma that has turned US foreign policy into a grotesque labyrinth of double standards, doublethink contradictions, and hypocrisies.

Be for Peace.
In 1916, March 4, Montana elected Jeannette Rankin the first woman in the House of Representatives.  Rankin went on to vote against WWI and WWII, and to lead marches against the Viet Nam War.

ENDOMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #219, MARCH 5, 2025. 

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #221, March 10, 2025.

$
0
0

 

 

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #221, March 10, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett

 [The arc of environmental sanity and justice is dipping, but the resistance is planetary, diverse, and indefatigable.  A toast to them!  --D]

LOCAL ACTIONS

People of all faiths and backgrounds are invited to take part in the Interfaith Climate Retreat, a powerful three-part event designed to inspire, educate, and mobilize our community in response to the climate crisis.

 Dates & Times:

•       Monday, March 31 6:30-8:30 pm

•       Thursday, April 3, 6:30-8:30 pm

•       Monday, April 7, 6:30-8:30 pm

Location: St. Paul’s Episcopal Church, 224 N East Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72701

The Interfaith Climate Retreat is a call to action, bringing together faith leaders and community members for a powerful series of film screenings, discussions, and collective reflection on climate change. The film screenings feature The Week, which was designed to help everyone to engage with the topic. Across all spiritual traditions, there is a shared responsibility to care for the Earth—not only for ourselves but for future generations. Through an interfaith lens, we will explore the urgency of the climate crisis and the transformative power of community-driven action.

Interfaith Climate Retreat Registration or at Interfaithclimateretreat@gmail.com 

Best,  Joanna Person-Michener   479-225-6803 (text please). OMNI Center and Quaker Community.

 

NATIONAL

VEGAN SUMMERFEST, 5 Days Vegan Bash

N. American Vegetarian Society (NAVS): Resisting the Climate Emergency

July 9-13, Johnstown, PA    518-568-7970

 

INTERNATIONAL

 

Some Marxist Perspectives on Climate from

FEBRUARY REVIEWS AND ARTICLES IN CLIMATE & CAPITALISM
Ecosocialist Bookshelf,” February 2025  Seven recent books on movement building, modern capitalism, evolution, ecology and colonialism.  Source
Other recent articles ...Ecosocialist Bookshelf, January 2025  
Extreme heat killed over 1300 Hajj pilgrims in 2024 
2024: Hottest year to date, and first year over 1.5ºC

 

“Ecosocialist Bookshelf” is a monthly column, hosted by Ian Angus.   Here’s one of the book reviewed in C&C

Kevin A. Young.  ABOLISHING FOSSIL FUELS:  Lessons from Movements that Won.  PM Press.
To win the fight against fossil fuels, the climate movement must learn from past victories. Kevin Young shows that electing and pressuring politicians has rarely been successful — that real gains have almost always been the product of upsurges in the fields, factories and streets. He offers lessons for building a multiracial working-class climate movement that can win a global green transition that’s both equitable and fast.

 

Related posts… (auto-generated)

·  What the new IPCC report says about climate change and land

·  Terry Townsend: A Marxist Analysis of Climate Change

·  The liberal attack on Naomi Klein and ‘This Changes Everything’

Anthropocene  Books & Reports  Capitalism  Climate Change  Commons  Fossil Fuel  Marxist theory  Movement Building

OMNI RUSSIA NEWSLETTER #1 (RUSSIA AND UKRAINE). March 23, 2014 (reprinted).

$
0
0

 

OMNI

RUSSIA NEWSLETTER #1 (RUSSIA AND UKRAINE).  March 23, 2014 (reprinted).

http://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2014/03/russia-ukraine-newsletter-1.html

Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace, Justice, and Ecology.

[Note: in a few years I changed my title from Newsletter to the more accurate Anthologies.   I am reprinting Anthology #1 because a decade later some part of the anti-war position seems to have reached the new War Lord, and President Trump seems about to end the US-NATO-Ukraine-Russia War!]

What’s at Stake:    The US superpower, imperial propaganda system is inciting fear and hatred of Russia, as in Cold War days against the Soviet Union, but alternative views are readily available in numerous independent print or online magazines; however, few are published by The Washington Post or CNN..  If we are to have peace in the world we must be able to see the world as others see it, as a corrective to official dogma.  [My newsletters do not give the Corporate/Pentagon/White House/Congressional/Mainstream Media/Imperia, US National Security State propaganda system, because it already overwhelmingly dominates mainstream media, it commands billions of Pentagon dollars via the military-industrial complex to persuade and purchase agreement to the official line, and publishing that line enriches the corporations and oligarchs employing anti-communist group think, and, as these anthologies demonstrate, the corporate-capitalist system wants one ideological argument, its nationalist/imperialist argument to prevail.    My sources are independent, global, and usually on the edge financially.  Also, the old, laudable journalistic rule of giving both sides is completely absurd in this situation.  No sane person would expect critics of US power to give equal time to perspectives that possess immense resources for promulgating unjust wars.  (So purchase a subscription to your favorite independents, buy books, subscribe to the journals you see in these anthologies, study them, and speak up.)  --Dick]

 

 

Newsletters

http://www.omnicenter.org/newsletter-archive/   Index:

http://www.omnicenter.org/omni-newsletter-general-index/

Blog http://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/

j.dick.bennett@gmail.com

 

CONNECTION BETWEEN US ENCIRCLEMENT OF CHINA AND RUSSIA:    See OMNI’s newsletters/blogs on US Imperialism Westward Pacific/E. Asia

 

Contents Russia/Ukraine Newsletter #1, 2014
(Plenty of protest against the pro-war Obama administration and media, but all together reflecting a comparatively small readership.  If you agree with the analyses of these alternative views that try to view Russia outside the US imperial box, then forward this newsletter and notify your contacts.)

Dick, US Empire and Corporate Media:  Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Patrick Smith, US/New York Times Spin

Stephen Cohen, Anti-Russia Is Old Anti-Soviet

Parry, Group Think

The Nation Editorial

Alterman, Cold War Hysteria Revived

How Russia/Ukraine Look in Beijing

Charles Pierce, Dick Cheney’s View

Luke Harding, US Refuses Crimea Poll

Ray McGovern, Putin Says No to Regime Change on Its Border

Bruce Gagnon, Danger of War Following US-led Coup for Gas and Oil

Pilger, Other Coups, Same Superpower

Robert Freeman, Ukraine and WWI over Energy

Mark Swaney

More Reading

Via Historians Against War (HAW)

Via Common Dreams

Via FAIR TV
Contact Arkansas Representatives  

 

Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, NYT, and in general from Cohen and Parry:        “. . . American media on Russia today are less objective, less balanced, more conformist and scarcely less ideological than when they covered Soviet Russia during the Cold War” (Cohen).  The remaining articles give a variety of background and context.   Perhaps the most important context is the encirclement of Russia by the West; take a look at a map of the countries that have joined or are in the process of joining NATO, which are military alliances.  Add to that a map of other countries around Russia with which the US has military alliances.  And then add a map of all US military bases surrounding Russia.   A similar, threatening enclosure has also been created against China.   See my newsletters/blogs, “US Westward Imperialism, Pacific/E. Asia.” 

      A perspective we should hold in mind is that of J. William Fulbright, expressed in all of his books, particularly in his final book, The Price of Empire.   His last chapter is entitled, “Seeing the World as Others See It.”  Empathy is one of the foundations underlying Fulbright’s thought, an attitude that usually eludes imperial superpowers.  The Afterword of this book is entitled “Changing Our Manner of Thinking.”  Cohen suggests that not only have our leaders and their followers not changed their Cold War enmity, they have worsened it.

       I have included information about the credentials of several of the authors, which are impressive.  --Dick

 

DICK: ANTI-RUSSIAN, PRO-WAR ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE

I have assessed a dozen ADG reports published during the month of March, 2014, with Cohen’s stringent claim in mind.  I did not try

 to compare present US mainstream media reporting on Russia to US mainstream media

reporting of the Soviet Union, because numerous books and articles have shown the US nationalistic

 hostility toward the Soviet Union during the “Cold War.”  Studies of the continuation of that hostility

 post-Soviet Union are now appearing.    There are more:  I did a simple search of "Ukraine" in the box in the top right hand corner--and this is what i came up with:  http://www.arkansasonline.com/search/?query=ukraine

 

 

 

     During the month of March the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette reportedon Russia and the Ukraine in two main ways:  1) news from The New York Times and from the Associated Press and 2) editorial ridicule, fear, and hatred of Russia.   The news reports were sometimes summarized by ADG staff.  For example, “Russia to Craft Its Own Crimea Proposals” (3-11-14).  This article derived from the NYT  and AP provided many perspectives, and I felt it tried to give readers a glimpse of a complex history and present politics.

      In sharp contrast, the newspaper mounted a sustained, belligerent, warmongering editorial attack on Russia. At least four cartoons showed either the Russian Bear victorious over teddy bear Ukraine (no mention of the coup that overthrew the pro-Russian head of state), or Obama irrelevant while Putin plans “Countries I’m Going to Invade” (no mention of the countries the US has invaded) or Putin breaking through the walls of the US, the EU, and NATO merely my sauntering through in a suit.   Glenn Garvin ofthe Miami Herald urged Obama to defeat Putin by developing US oil and gas.   Two columns by Charles Krauthammer presented skilled hatchet jobs against wimp talkers and appeasers Obama and Kerry versus imperial Putin seeking “national power, territory, dominion” (“The Wages of Weakness,” 3-10-14).  Two Washington Post guest editorials accused Putin of being out of touch with reality and urged the West to seek Russia’s financial ruin.   Mark Champion of Bloomberg News (another guest column, 3-11-14) recounted the sufferings of Crimea’s “Muslim Tatars” through the witness of one victim, to conclude that the West should protect them, and should aid the Ukraine’s integration into the EU.  But the most virulent voice is that of the editorial page editor, Paul Greenberg.   In “The Cossacks Are Back” (3-5-14)  John Kerry is “hapless and hopeless” (not true), Hagel is cutting the Pentagon’s budget (not true),  while contemporary Russia is demeaned as Tsarist “thuggism” and Putin as “Tsar Vladimir.”  “The more Russia changes, the more repressive it stays.”  The result of US appeasement of Russian aggression?  “…chaos, war.”

     Thus in Arkansas, at least, we have been subjected to the White House/mainstream media pro-war blast.  Fortunately, if we seek, we can find alternative views by people who try to see as Russians see it or who try to gather a fuller past and present reality than are presented by our government and mainstream media..

 

 

WEDNESDAY, MAR 12, 2014 05:59 PM CDT

Propaganda, lies and the New York Times: Everything you really need to know about Ukraine

The media keeps buying the American spin on what's happening in Ukraine. Let's cut through the fog

PATRICK L. SMITH

 

TOPICS: CRIMEA, UKRAINE, PUTIN, JOHN KERRY, F THE EU, VICTORIA NULAND, NEW YORK TIMES, MEDIA CRITICISM,NEWS, POLITICS NEWS

Barack Obama, Vladimir Putin (Credit: AP/Evan Vucci)

You need a machete these days to whack through the thicket of misinformation, disinformation, spin, propaganda and straight-out lying that daily envelopes the Ukraine crisis like kudzu on an Alabama telephone pole. But an outline of an outcome is now faintly discernible.

Here is my early call: We witness an American intervention in the process of failing, and the adventure’s only yields will be much pointless suffering among Ukrainians and life for years to come in the smothering embrace of a justifiably suspicious Russian bear.

Nice going, Victoria Nuland, you of the famous “F the E.U. tape,” and your sidekick, Geoffrey Pyatt, ambassador in Kiev. Nice going, Secretary of State Kerry. For this caper, Nuland and Pyatt should be reassigned to post offices in the bleak reaches of Kansas, Khrushchev-style. Kerry is too big to fail, I suppose, but at least we now know more about what caliber of subterfuge lies behind all those plane trips, one mess following another in his jet wash.

On the ground, Vladimir Putin continues to extend the Russian presence in Crimea, and we await signs as to whether he will go further into Ukraine. This is very regrettable. Viewed as cause-and-effect, however, it is first a measure of how miscalculated the American intervention plot was from the first.

Pretending innocent horror now is a waste of time. The Ukraine tragedy is real estate with many names on the deed. This must not get lost in the sauce.

On the diplomatic side, the big charge now is intransigence. Washington calls Moscow intransigent because Vladimir Putin and his foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, decline to talk to the self-appointed government in Kiev, which Putin refuses to recognize. Moscow calls Washington intransigent because Kerry declines to meet Lavrov unless the latter agrees first to meet the Kiev provisionals.

The American line: The provisionals are legitimate, they are democrats worthy of support, and there was no coup when they hounded President Viktor Yanukovych from office Feb. 21. The protesters behind them with clubs, pistols and bottle bombs are democrats, too.

The Russian line: The provisionals are illegitimate, they took power in a coup driven in considerable part by nationalist fanatics with a fascist streak evident in their ranks, they are now dependent on same, and they merit neither support nor recognition.

This is it as of now, simplified but not simplistic, story and counter-story.

It is difficult but not impossible to interpret these narratives. The first step, admittedly hard for many Americans, is to drop all Cold War baggage and see beyond the West’s century-and-a-half habit of demonizing Russia as the emblematic power of the inherently autocratic East. “Oriental despotism” was a passing fad conjured by a scholar-stooge named Karl Wittfogel in the late 1950s. It died a deserved death — around the time of hula hoops, I think — but the prejudice lingers, remarkably, in many Western minds.

Here comes the bitter bit. The Russian take in the Ukraine crisis is more truthful than the artful dodge Washington attempts. The above forecast of the outcome rests on the thought that the dodge is simply too flimsy to last.

You cannot make a call such as this without looking closely. So let’s.

Putin and Lavrov are open to negotiations with the U.S. and the European Union. Putin commits to supporting Ukrainian elections set for May and backs the agreement struck between Yanukovych and his opponents just before the latter abandoned it and deposed him, even as Putin did not like it at the time. No, Moscow does not recognize the provisionals in Kiev, with sound reasons, but it does not require that Washington drop its support before getting to the mahogany table.

In the climate our media have generated, I almost feel the need to apologize for this but will refuse: I cannot locate the intransigence in this.

Now to Kerry and President Obama. Last week Lavrov invited Kerry to Sochi for face time with Putin, and Kerry considered it. Then he abruptly declined on the argument that the Russians must first commit to talks with the new crowd in Kiev. Here is the problem: Kerry’s demand does not hold up as a precondition; it is logically a point of negotiation. Set it as a precondition and you have, so far as I can make out, intransigence.

What is the preoccupation with a Moscow-Kiev gathering, anyway? This gets interesting, and you have to recall the dramatis personae in the Nuland tape of Feb. 7.

Insisting on direct talks between Russia and the provisional government in Kiev is to insist the former recognize the latter, a trap Putin cannot possibly be stupid enough to fall into. Recognition, in turn, would complete the Nuland-Pyatt project to gift Ukrainians with a post–Yanukovych puppet government. This is Kerry’s unstated intent.

It is remarkable what a good road map the Nuland tape has proven. She mentioned three names in her exchange with Pyatt: Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Oleh Tyahnybok and Vitali Klitschko. The first, Nuland’s favorite, is now prime minister; Tyahnybok was running ahead of Yanukovych in polls at the time Nuland was taped and remains the vigorously anti-Russian head of Svoboda, a power-balancing party of rightists; Klitschko is not in the government but plans to run for president in the May elections.

This is precisely the constellation Nuland described as her work in progress: Yatsenyuk in, the others more useful outside for now. As a measure of Washington’s unseemly haste to lend legitimacy, Obama meets Yatsenyuk in Washington as I write — an unelected leader of who knows whom sitting in the White House.

Just for good measure, Nuland also mentioned one Robert Serry, a U.N. official Washington arm-twisted Ban Ki-moon into sending to Kiev to give a veneer of multi-sided consensus. And there was Serry in the news last week — when Crimeans chased him across their border at gunpoint. They must be reading the papers carefully, those Crimeans.

At writing, the Obama scrum is debating whether to impose swift, cutting sanctions on the Russians (the political people) or ease off for fear of self-inflicted damage (the trade and business people). Leading the charge for tough stuff are none other than Nuland and Pyatt.

Maybe they are scared of getting sent to Kansas if the project does not come good.

The more I scrutinize it, the more the American case on Ukraine is held together with spit and baling wire. Were I Obama or Kerry, I would be looking for an out by now, cutting losses on a commitment to intervention that was sheer hubris from the first.

Significantly in this connection, the contorted logic of just who is running things in Kiev is soon to fail, in my view. Washington is all out in denying the character of the protest movement and the provisionals, casting Putin as a paranoid in his characterizations. It is wishful thinking. Incessantly repeated untruths never transform into truths.

The decisive influence of ultra-right extremists, some openly committed to an ideology of violence, some whose political ancestors sided with the Nazis to oppose the Soviets, is a matter of record. Svoboda and Right Sector, the two most organized of these groups, now propose to rise into national politics. Right Sector’s leader, Dmytro Yarosh, intends to run for president. The New York Times just described him as “an expert with firebombs” during the street protest period.

These people are thugs by any other name. One cannot see how this can be in question — or why the Times suggests that Russia’s descriptions of them as such amount to “a fun house mirror.”

And it is no good pretending their influence does not continue. They remain in the street and maintain the barricades, and they are happy to tell you (as one told a network correspondent last week) that they could take down the new government, too, if they so chose. You can stop wondering why the provisionals show zero interest in conducting promised investigations into the origins of the violence that toppled Yanukovych. Washington seems to have lost track of that idea, too.

On the other side of the piles of tires, ultra-rightists hold three portfolios in the 18–member provisional cabinet. Yarosh is deputy director of the security council. (I suppose he would be assigned to investigate the violence were anyone to get the job.) It is near to preposterous that Kerry would insist that Moscow officials meet with this man or others like him.

I read Ukraine as a case of what happens when so much of policy, in all kinds of spheres, is conducted in secret. Ordinary citizens cannot see events and are left to judge them blind. And the media are not going to help you. However, there have been notable exceptions to the media’s cooperation in keeping things from us instead of informing.

Earlier this week, Leslie Gelb let loose with a vigorous blast in the Daily Beast, calling on the Americans (and others) to “stop their lies and self-destructive posturing or pay costs they’re loath to admit.” Gelb is a longtime presence in foreign policy cliques — former Times columnist, former State Department official, now president emeritus at the Council on Foreign Relations. The critique reveals a significant breach in the orthodoxy.

Not to root for the home team, but Nicholas Davies just published in Salon an inventory of 35 cases wherein Washington has split the sheets with fascists in the interest of intervention. Read it. Splendidly timed, it demolishes all argument that what is in front of our eyes is somehow not. History so often does the job, I find.

Elsewhere, things go from bad to execrable. Here I have to single out Timothy Snyder, a Yale historian, who froths at the mouth in a three-part blog series published by the New York Review of Books. This guy should be brought up on charges under toxic waste laws.

You get lies: Yanukovych refused to sign the February compromise with his opposition. (It was signed in his office so far as I understand.) You get bent logic: The new cabinet includes three Jews, proving (somehow) it is legitimate. The ultra-right has only three cabinet posts. (Only? That is 16 percent of it. Why any?)

And you get radical miscalculations. Snyder compares Putin with Hitler — unwise given the composition of the government and the barricades people he wants to say are fine. In trying to persuade us that the extremist bit is Moscow’s propaganda, he produces lengths of propaganda, some of it — no other word — extremist.

I carry no hatchet for Snyder, though the Yale professorship causes me to wonder. But in bravely defending every aspect of the Washington orthodoxy, Snyder gives a faithful map of all its fault lines. So it is useful reading, here, here and here, providing you know what you are getting.

Next Sunday Crimeans will vote in a referendum as to whether they wish to break with the rest of Ukraine and join the Russian Federation. The semi-autonomous region’s parliament has already voted to do so, and good enough that they put the thought to a popular vote.

But no. Self-determination was the guiding principle when demonstrators and pols with records as election losers pushed Yanukovych out and got done via a coup (I insist on the word) what they could not manage in polling booths. But it cannot apply in Crimea’s case. The Crimeans are illegitimate and have no right to such a vote.

Simply too shabby. I cannot see how it can hold much longer.

Patrick Smith is the author of “Time No Longer: Americans After the American Century” was the International Herald Tribune’s bureau chief in Hong Kong and then Tokyo from 1985 to 1992. During this time he also wrote “Letter from Tokyo” for the New Yorker. He is the author of four previous books and has contributed frequently to the New York Times, the Nation, the Washington Quarterly, and other publications.

 

 

BASHING PUTIN

Stephen Cohen, “Distorting Russia.”  The Nation (March 3, 2014).

Distorting Russia

How the American media misrepresent Putin, Sochi and Ukraine.

Stephen F. Cohen 

   |    This article appeared in the March 3, 2014 edition of The Nation.

 

 

(Reuters/Mikhail Klimentyev/RIA Novosti/Pool)

The degradation of mainstream American press coverage of Russia, a country still vital to US national security, has been under way for many years. If the recent tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles in leading newspapers and magazines—particularly about the Sochi Olympics, Ukraine and, unfailingly, President Vladimir Putin—is an indication, this media malpractice is now pervasive and the new norm.

There are notable exceptions, but a general pattern has developed. Even in the venerable New York Times and Washington Post, news reports, editorials and commentaries no longer adhere rigorously to traditional journalistic standards, often failing to provide essential facts and context; to make a clear distinction between reporting and analysis; to require at least two different political or “expert” views on major developments; or to publish opposing opinions on their op-ed pages. As a result, American media on Russia today are less objective, less balanced, more conformist and scarcely less ideological than when they covered Soviet Russia during the Cold War.

The history of this degradation is also clear. It began in the early 1990s, following the end of the Soviet Union, when the US media adopted Washington’s narrative that almost everything President Boris Yeltsin did was a “transition from communism to democracy” and thus in America’s best interests. This included his economic “shock therapy” and oligarchic looting of essential state assets, which destroyed tens of millions of Russian lives; armed destruction of a popularly elected Parliament and imposition of a “presidential” Constitution, which dealt a crippling blow to democratization and now empowers Putin; brutal war in tiny Chechnya, which gave rise to terrorists in Russia’s North Caucasus; rigging of his own re-election in 1996; and leaving behind, in 1999, his approval ratings in single digits, a disintegrating country laden with weapons of mass destruction. Indeed, most American journalists still give the impression that Yeltsin was an ideal Russian leader.

Since the early 2000s, the media have followed a different leader-centric narrative, also consistent with US policy, that devalues multifaceted analysis for a relentless demonization of Putin, with little regard for facts. (Was any Soviet Communist leader after Stalin ever so personally villainized?) If Russia under Yeltsin was presented as having legitimate politics and national interests, we are now made to believe that Putin’s Russia has none at all, at home or abroad—even on its own borders, as in Ukraine.

Russia today has serious problems and many repugnant Kremlin policies. But anyone relying on mainstream American media will not find there any of their origins or influences in Yeltsin’s Russia or in provocative US policies since the 1990s—only in the “autocrat” Putin who, however authoritarian, in reality lacks such power. Nor is he credited with stabilizing a disintegrating nuclear-armed country, assisting US security pursuits from Afghanistan and Syria to Iran or even with granting amnesty, in December, to more than 1,000 jailed prisoners, including mothers of young children.

Not surprisingly, in January The Wall Street Journal featured the widely discredited former president of Georgia, Mikheil Saakashvili, branding Putin’s government as one of “deceit, violence and cynicism,” with the Kremlin a “nerve center of the troubles that bedevil the West.” But wanton Putin-bashing is also the dominant narrative in centrist, liberal and progressive media, from the Post, Times and The New Republic to CNN, MSNBC and HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher, where Howard Dean, not previously known for his Russia expertise, recently declared, to the panel’s approval, “Vladimir Putin is a thug.”

The media therefore eagerly await Putin’s downfall—due to his “failing economy” (some of its indicators are better than US ones), the valor of street protesters and other right-minded oppositionists (whose policies are rarely examined), the defection of his electorate (his approval ratings remain around 65 percent) or some welcomed “cataclysm.” Evidently believing, as does the Times, for example, that democrats and a “much better future” will succeed Putin (not zealous ultranationalists growing in the streets and corridors of power), US commentators remain indifferent to what the hoped-for “destabilization of his regime” might mean in the world’s largest nuclear country.

Certainly, The New Republic’s lead writer on Russia, Julia Ioffe, does not explore the question, or much else of real consequence, in her nearly 10,000-word February 17 cover story. Ioffe’s bannered theme is devoutly Putin-phobic: “He Crushed His Opposition and Has Nothing to Show for It But a Country That Is Falling Apart.” Neither sweeping assertion is spelled out or documented. A compilation of chats with Russian-born Ioffe’s disaffected (but seemingly not “crushed”) Moscow acquaintances and titillating personal gossip long circulating on the Internet, the article seems better suited (apart from some factual errors) for the Russian tabloids, as does Ioffe’s disdain for objectivity. Protest shouts of “Russia without Putin!” and “Putin is a thief!” were “one of the most exhilarating moments I’d ever experienced.” So was tweeting “Putin’s fucked, y’all.” Nor does she forget the hopeful mantra “cataclysm seems closer than ever now.”

* * *

For weeks, this toxic coverage has focused on the Sochi Olympics and the deepening crisis in Ukraine. Even before the Games began, the Times declared the newly built complex a “Soviet-style dystopia” and warned in a headline, Terrorism and Tension, Not Sports and Joy. On opening day, the paper found space for three anti-Putin articles and a lead editorial, a feat rivaled by thePost. Facts hardly mattered. Virtually every US report insisted that a record $51 billion “squandered” by Putin on the Sochi Games proved they were “corrupt.” But as Ben Aris ofBusiness New Europe pointed out, as much as $44 billion may have been spent “to develop the infrastructure of the entire region,” investment “the entire country needs.”

Overall pre-Sochi coverage was even worse, exploiting the threat of terrorism so licentiously it seemed pornographic. The Post, long known among critical-minded Russia-watchers asPravda on the Potomac, exemplified the media ethos. A sports columnist and an editorial page editor turned the Olympics into “a contest of wills” between the despised Putin’s “thugocracy” and terrorist “insurgents.” The “two warring parties” were so equated that readers might have wondered which to cheer for. If nothing else, American journalists gave terrorists an early victory, tainting “Putin’s Games” and frightening away many foreign spectators, including some relatives of the athletes.

The Sochi Games will soon pass, triumphantly or tragically, but the potentially fateful Ukrainian crisis will not. A new Cold War divide between West and East may now be unfolding, not in Berlin but in the heart of Russia’s historical civilization. The result could be a permanent confrontation fraught with instability and the threat of a hot war far worse than the one in Georgia in 2008. These dangers have been all but ignored in highly selective, partisan and inflammatory US media accounts, which portray the European Union’s “Partnership” proposal benignly as Ukraine’s chance for democracy, prosperity and escape from Russia, thwarted only by a “bullying” Putin and his “cronies” in Kiev.

Not long ago, committed readers could count on The New York Review of Books for factually trustworthy alternative perspectives on important historical and contemporary subjects. But when it comes to Russia and Ukraine, the NYRB has succumbed to the general media mania. In a January 21 blog post, Amy Knight, a regular contributor and inveterate Putin-basher, warned the US government against cooperating with the Kremlin on Sochi security, even suggesting that Putin’s secret services “might have had an interest in allowing or even facilitating such attacks” as killed or wounded dozens of Russians in Volgograd in December.

Knight’s innuendo prefigured a purported report on Ukraine by Yale professor Timothy Snyder in the February 20 issue. Omissions of facts, by journalists or scholars, are no less an untruth than misstatements of fact. Snyder’s article was full of both, which are widespread in the popular media, but these are in the esteemed NYRB and by an acclaimed academic. Consider a few of Snyder’s assertions:

§”On paper, Ukraine is now a dictatorship.” In fact, the “paper” legislation he’s referring to hardly constituted dictatorship, and in any event was soon repealed. Ukraine is in a state nearly the opposite of dictatorship—political chaos uncontrolled by President Viktor Yanukovych, the Parliament, the police or any other government institution.

§”The [parliamentary] deputies…have all but voted themselves out of existence.” Again, Snyder is alluding to the nullified “paper.” Moreover, serious discussions have been under way in Kiev about reverting to provisions in the 2004 Constitution that would return substantial presidential powers to the legislature, hardly “the end of parliamentary checks on presidential power,” as Snyder claims. (Does he dislike the prospect of a compromise outcome?)

§”Through remarkably large and peaceful public protests…Ukrainians have set a positive example for Europeans.” This astonishing statement may have been true in November, but it now raises questions about the “example” Snyder is advocating. The occupation of government buildings in Kiev and in Western Ukraine, the hurling of firebombs at police and other violent assaults on law enforcement officers and the proliferation of anti-Semitic slogans by a significant number of anti-Yanukovych protesters, all documented and even televised, are not an “example” most readers would recommend to Europeans or Americans. Nor are they tolerated, even if accompanied by episodes of police brutality, in any Western democracy.

§”Representatives of a minor group of the Ukrainian extreme right have taken credit for the violence.” This obfuscation implies that apart perhaps from a “minor group,” the “Ukrainian extreme right” is part of the positive “example” being set. (Many of its representatives have expressed hatred for Europe’s “anti-traditional” values, such as gay rights.) Still more, Snyder continues, “something is fishy,” strongly implying that the mob violence is actually being “done by russo-phone provocateurs” on behalf of “Yanukovych (or Putin).” As evidence, Snyder alludes to “reports” that the instigators “spoke Russian.” But millions of Ukrainians on both sides of their incipient civil war speak Russian.

§Snyder reproduces yet another widespread media malpractice regarding Russia, the decline of editorial fact-checking. In a recent article in the International New York Times, he both inflates his assertions and tries to delete neofascist elements from his innocuous “Ukrainian extreme right.” Again without any verified evidence, he warns of a Putin-backed “armed intervention” in Ukraine after the Olympics and characterizes reliable reports of “Nazis and anti-Semites” among street protesters as “Russian propaganda.”

§Perhaps the largest untruth promoted by Snyder and most US media is the claim that “Ukraine’s future integration into Europe” is “yearned for throughout the country.” But every informed observer knows—from Ukraine’s history, geography, languages, religions, culture, recent politics and opinion surveys—that the country is deeply divided as to whether it should join Europe or remain close politically and economically to Russia. There is not one Ukraine or one “Ukrainian people” but at least two, generally situated in its Western and Eastern regions.

Such factual distortions point to two flagrant omissions by Snyder and other US media accounts. The now exceedingly dangerous confrontation between the two Ukraines was not “ignited,” as the Times claims, by Yanukovych’s duplicitous negotiating—or by Putin—but by the EU’s reckless ultimatum, in November, that the democratically elected president of a profoundly divided country choose between Europe and Russia. Putin’s proposal for a tripartite arrangement, rarely if ever reported, was flatly rejected by US and EU officials.

Please support our journalism. Get a digital subscription for just $9.50!

But the most crucial media omission is Moscow’s reasonable conviction that the struggle for Ukraine is yet another chapter in the West’s ongoing, US-led march toward post-Soviet Russia, which began in the 1990s with NATO’s eastward expansion and continued with US-funded NGO political activities inside Russia, a US-NATO military outpost in Georgia and missile-defense installations near Russia. Whether this longstanding Washington-Brussels policy is wise or reckless, it—not Putin’s December financial offer to save Ukraine’s collapsing economy—is deceitful. The EU’s “civilizational” proposal, for example, includes “security policy” provisions, almost never reported, that would apparently subordinate Ukraine to NATO.

Any doubts about the Obama administration’s real intentions in Ukraine should have been dispelled by the recently revealed taped conversation between a top State Department official, Victoria Nuland, and the US ambassador in Kiev. The media predictably focused on the source of the “leak” and on Nuland’s verbal “gaffe”—“Fuck the EU.” But the essential revelation was that high-level US officials were plotting to “midwife” a new, anti-Russian Ukrainian government by ousting or neutralizing its democratically elected president—that is, a coup.

Americans are left with a new edition of an old question. Has Washington’s twenty-year winner-take-all approach to post-Soviet Russia shaped this degraded news coverage, or is official policy shaped by the coverage? Did Senator John McCain stand in Kiev alongside the well-known leader of an extreme nationalist party because he was ill informed by the media, or have the media deleted this part of the story because of McCain’s folly?

And what of Barack Obama’s decision to send only a low-level delegation, including retired gay athletes, to Sochi? In August, Putin virtually saved Obama’s presidency by persuading Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to eliminate his chemical weapons. Putin then helped to facilitate Obama’s heralded opening to Iran. Should not Obama himself have gone to Sochi—either out of gratitude to Putin, or to stand with Russia’s leader against international terrorists who have struck both of our countries? Did he not go because he was ensnared by his unwise Russia policies, or because the US media misrepresented the varying reasons cited: the granting of asylum to Edward Snowden, differences on the Middle East, infringements on gay rights in Russia, and now Ukraine? Whatever the explanation, as Russian intellectuals say when faced with two bad alternatives, “Both are worst.”

Stephen F. Cohen 

   |    This article appeared in the March 3, 2014 edition of The Nation.

 

 

Robert Parry | The 'We-Hate-Putin' Group Think 
Consortium News, Reader Supported News, March 8, 2014 
Parry writes: "Across the ideological spectrum, there is rave support for the coup that overthrew Ukraine's elected president - and endless ranting against Russian President Vladimir Putin for refusing to accept the new coup leadership in Kiev and intervening to protect Russian interests in Crimea." 
READ MORE   http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/22448-the-we-hate-putin-group-think

 

 

 

CONTEXTS, ALTERNATIVE VIEWS

 

Time for Realism and Common Sense on Ukraine

The international community should be pushing for compromise to prevent this fragile and bitterly divided country from breaking apart.

The Editors 

   |    This article appeared in the March 24, 2014 edition of The Nation.  [The article I read in the 3-24 issue is entitled “Ukraine in Crisis.”  --Dick]

·        Share

·       

 

 

 

 

Armed servicemen wait in Russian army vehicles in the Crimean town of Balaclava, March 1, 2014. (Reuters/Baz Ratner)

The escalating crisis in Ukraine has set off reckless missile-rattling in this country. As Harvard’s Stephen Walt tweeted on March 2: “Public discourse on #Ukraine situation hitting new hghts in hyperbole. (‘New Cold War, WW III,’ etc.) Rhetorical overkill not helpful.” He may have been thinking of neocon Charles Krauthammer, who in his Washington Post column called for the United States to ante up $15 billion for Ukraine and send a naval flotilla to the Black Sea. The same paper headlined that the crisis “tests Obama’s focus on diplomacy over military force,” quoting Andrew Kuchins of the Center for Strategic and International Studies decrying President Obama’s “taking the stick option off the table.”

The Obama administration has responded to the crisis by flexing its own rhetorical muscles. When Russian President Vladimir Putin ignored Obama’s warning that “there will be costs” if Russia sent troops into Crimea, Secretary of State John Kerry denounced the “brazen act of aggression,” vowing that “Russia is going to lose, the Russian people are going to lose” and suggesting “asset freezes…isolation with respect to trade and investment,” while promising “economic assistance of the major sort” for whatever government emerges in Kiev.

European governments were far more measured, with many condemning Russia’s Crimean invasion but most of them clearly reluctant to impose economic sanctions. Their economic ties to Russia are much closer than America’s, of course, but they also understand that diplomacy will be more effective. Among the cooler heads at home was Jack Matlock, ambassador to the Soviet Union under Ronald Reagan, who described the administration’s warnings to Putin as “ill-advised” and argued that “whatever slim hope thatMoscow might avoid overt military intervention in Ukraine disappeared when Obama in effect threw down a gauntlet and challenged him. This was not just a mistake of political judgment—it was a failure to understand human psychology—unless, of course, he actually wanted a Russian intervention, which is hard for me to believe.”

We should take a deep breath—and a sober look—before committing treasure and prestige to a still-unsettled new leadership in a country on Russia’s border, one that has had a fragile independent existence for barely two decades. Some history would also serve us well if we’re to understand fast-moving developments. We are reaping the bitter fruit of a deeply flawed post–Cold War settlement that looks more like Versailles than Bretton Woods, a settlement inflamed by the shortsighted American decision to expand NATO eastward and pursue other policies aimed at isolating Russia and ignoring Russian interests.

Russia’s dispatch of military forces to Crimea is a clear violation of international law. Putin justifies the invasion as necessary to protect Russian citizens and allies, but this is a fig leaf. The Obama administration is right to condemn it, although much of the world will grimace at the irony of Secretary Kerry denouncing the invasion of a sovereign country even as the United States only now winds down its “war of choice” against Iraq, which is thousands of miles away from US borders. Crimea, of course, not only abuts Russia but houses its Black Sea Fleet, which, by treaty agreement between Ukraine and Russia, is set to remain there until at least 2042. Crimea historically was part of Russia until 1954, when Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev transferred it to Ukraine in what many viewed as a gesture of good will.

Viktor Yanukovych was corrupt and unpopular, but he was the democratically elected president of Ukraine. He had been steering the country toward an association agreement with the European Union last fall when he reversed course after Russia offered$15 billion in financial aid to the all-but-bankrupt country. That led to the street demonstrations—spurred in part by the EU and the United States—that eventually sent Yanukovych packing.

Ukraine is deeply divided. As David Speedie, director of the US global engagement program at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, says, “In simple terms, half the people in Ukraine look to Russia and the other half look to the West.” As Nicolai Petro details in his March 3 report at TheNation.com, the new leaders in Kiev include right-wing ultranationalists who, in one of their first acts, repealed the 2012 law allowing Russian and other minority languages to be used locally. (That measure was reversed, but not before arousing deep mistrust and fear in semiautonomous Crimea and many other parts of eastern and southern Ukraine, which are populated largely by Russian speakers.) It is also worth noting that one party in the new government, holding key cabinet posts as well as central leadership positions in Parliament and law enforcement, is Svoboda, which the European Parliament has condemned for its “racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic views.” Even further to the right is the neofascist Right Sector, which dominates the Maidan, or Independence Square, the heart of the rebellion, which has refused to disband and exerts significant influence over the new regime’s policies.

Yanukovych’s decision to postpone the EU’s association agreement was not irrational. It would have forced Ukraine to decide between Russia and the EU, flatly rejecting Putin’s offer of a tripartite arrangement that would allow the country to sustain its ties with Russia. Quite apart from Putin’s December offer of financial rescue, Ukraine is heavily dependent economically on Russia, which supplies and subsidizes much of its energy and is its largest trading partner. The EU and the United States, for all their bluster, are not about to replace that deep connection with Western aid and trade. Americans across the political spectrum will not be enthusiastic about sending billions to a country on the other side of the world while we are cutting back on vital investments at home. The EU, dominated by Germany, has inflicted brutal austerity on its own troubled members like Greece, Spain and Portugal. There’s every reason to think the EU, with or without the IMF, would impose an equally harsh regime on Ukraine as the price of financial aid. Any responsible government in Kiev should examine very carefully the level of support offered by these Western institutions, as well as the conditions attached to it.

In the Western media’s passion play, which largely disdains or distorts context and history, Putin is the designated villain. But Ukraine is central to Russian security, and Russia is far less concerned about its next-door neighbor’s economic relations with the EU (Russia itself is a major source of energy for the Europeans) than the further extension of NATO to its borders. A hostile Ukraine might displace Russian bases on the Black Sea, harbor the US fleet and provide a home to NATO bases. This isn’t an irrational fear. Despite promises by George H.W. Bush not to extend the West’s Cold War military alliance after Germany was united, eight former Warsaw Pact nations and three former Soviet republics have been incorporated into NATO, with the United States and NATO even setting up a military outpost in Georgia. And the EU association agreement, advertised as offering free trade, in fact had military clauses that called for integrating Ukraine into the EU military structure, including cooperation on “civilian and military crisis management operations” and “relevant exercises” concerning them. No one should be surprised that Putin reacted negatively to such a prospect. It’s difficult to imagine any American administration accepting a decision by Mexico to join a military alliance with Russia.

US foreign policy needs a strong dose of realism and common sense. It’s absurd to scold Obama for “taking the stick option off the table”: the unavoidable fact is that the United States has no stick in relation to Ukraine. Americans have no desire and no reason to go to war with Russia over Crimea, and the EU and the United States are not about to supplant Russia’s economic influence in Ukraine. Washington is not going to provide the aid, the trade or the subsidized energy Ukraine needs, and the EU—which is still mired in its own deep economic crisis—doesn’t have the means to offer Ukraine much beyond painful austerity. Its new government is not elected, not legitimate and not at all settled. The international community should be pushing hard for compromise before this fragile and bitterly divided country breaks apart.

Frustrated cold warriors filling armchairs in Washington’s outdated “strategic” think tanks will continue to howl at the moon, but US policy should be run by the sober. The president should work with the EU and Russia to preserve Ukraine’s territorial unity, support free elections and allow Ukraine to be part of both the EU and the Russian customs union, while pledging that NATO will not extend itself into Ukraine. It is time to reduce tensions, not draw red lines, flex rhetorical muscles and fan the flames of folly.

Read Next: Eric Alterman on the American right wing’s reaction to the situation in Ukraine.  P. 10

The Editors 

   |    This article appeared in the March 24, 2014 edition of The Nation.

 

 

How Crimea plays in Beijing

Global Network [globalnet@mindspring.com]

 GN List Serve ‎[globenet@yahoogroups.com]‎ 

 Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:49 PM

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/CEN-02-200314.html

 

THE ROVING EYE

How Crimea plays in Beijing

By Pepe Escobar

  

"We are paying very close attention to the situation in Ukraine. We hope all parties can calmly maintain restraint to prevent the situation from further escalating and worsening. Political resolution and dialogue is the only way out."

 

This, via Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Li Baodong, is Beijing's quite measured, official interpretation of what's happening in Ukraine, tailored for global consumption.

 

But here, in a People's Daily editorial, is what the leadership is really thinking. And the focus is clearly on the dangers of regime change, the "West's inability to understand the lessons of history", and "the final battlefield of the Cold War."

 

Yet again the West misinterpreted China's abstention from the UN Security Council vote on a US-backed resolution condemning the Crimea referendum. The spin was that Russia - which vetoed the resolution - was "isolated". It's not. And the way Beijing plays geopolitics shows it's not.

 

Oh, Samantha …

 

The herd of elephants in the (Ukraine) room, in terms of global opinion, is how the authentic "international community" - from the G-20 to the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) - who has had enough of the Exceptionalist Hypocrisy Show, has fully understood, and even applauded, that at least one country on the planet has the balls to clearly say "F**k the US". Russia under President Vladimir Putin may harbor quite a few distortions, just like any other nation. But this is not a dinner party; this is realpolitik. To face down the US Leviathan, nothing short of a bad ass such as Putin will suffice.

 

NATO - or shorthand for the Pentagon dominating European wimps - keeps issuing threats and spewing out "consequences". What are they going to do - launch a barrage of ICBMs equipped with nuclear warheads against Moscow?

 

Furthermore, the UN Security Council itself is a joke, with US ambassador Samantha "Nothing Compares to You" Power - one of the mothers of R2P ("responsibility to protect") - carping on "Russian aggression", "Russian provocations" and comparing the Crimean referendum to a theft. Oh yes; bombing Iraq, bombing Libya and getting to the brink of bombing Syria were just innocent humanitarian gestures. Samantha The Humanitarian arguably gives a better performance invoking Sinead O'Connor in her shower.

 

Russian ambassador Vitaly Churkin was polite enough to say, "these insults addressed to our country" are "unacceptable". It's what he added that carried the real juice; "If the delegation of the United States of America expects our cooperation in the Security Council on other issues, then Power must understand this quite clearly."

 

Samantha The Humanitarian, as well as the whole bunch of juvenile bystanders in the Obama administration, won't understand it. Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov gave them a little help; Russia didn't want to use the Iranian nuclear talks to "raise the stakes", but if the US and the EU continue with their sanctions and threats, that's what's going to happen.

 

So the plot thickens - as in a closer and closer strategic partnership between Tehran and Moscow.

 

Secessionists of the world, unite?

 

Now imagine all this as seen from Beijing. No one knows what exactly goes on in the corridors of the Zhongnanhai, but it's fair to argue there's only an apparent contradiction between China's key principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states, and Russia's intervention in Crimea.

 

Beijing has identified very clearly the sequence of affairs; long-running Western interference in Ukraine via NGOs and the State Department; regime change perpetrated with the help of fascists and neo-nazis; a pre-emptive Russian counterattack which can be read as a by-the-book Samantha The Humanitarian R2P operation (protecting Russians and Russian speakers from a second coup planned in Crimea, and thwarted by Russian intelligence.)

 

On top of it Beijing well knows how Crimea has been essentially Russian since 1783; how Crimea - as well as a great deal of Ukraine - fall smack into Russian civilization's sphere of influence; and how Western interference directly threatened Russia's national security interests (as Putin made it clear.) Now imagine a similar scenario in Tibet or Xinjiang. Long-running Western interference via NGOs and the CIA; a take over by Tibetans in Lhasa or Uighurs in Kashgar of the local administration. Beijing could easily use Samantha's R2P in the name of protecting Han Chinese.

 

Yet Beijing (silently) agreeing to the Russian response to the coup in Kiev by getting Crimea back via a referendum and without a shot fired does not mean that "splittists"Tibet or Taiwan would be allowed to engage in the same route. Even as Tibet, more than Taiwan, would be able to build a strong historical case for seceding. Each case bears its own myriad complexities.

 

The Obama administration - like a blind Minotaur - is now lost in a labyrinth of pivots of its own making. A new Borges - that Buddha in a gray suit - is needed to tell the tale. First there was the pivoting to Asia-Pac - which is encircling of China under another name - as it's well understood in Beijing.

 

Then came the pivoting to Persia - "if we are not going to war", as that Cypher in Search of an Idea, John Kerry, put it. There was, of course, the martial pivoting to Syria, aborted at the last minute thanks to the good offices of Moscow diplomacy. And back to the pivoting to Russia, trampling the much-lauded "reset" and conceived as a payback for Syria.

 

Those who believe Beijing strategists have not carefully analyzed - and calculated a response - to all the implications of these overlapping pivots do deserve to join Samantha in the shower. Additionally, it's easy to picture Chinese Think Tankland hardly repressing its glee in analyzing a hyperpower endlessly, helplessly pivoting over itself.

 

While the Western dogs bark …

 

Russia and China are strategic partners - at the G-20, at the BRICS club of emerging powers and at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Their number one objective, in these and other forums, is the emergence of a multipolar world; no bullying by the American Empire of Bases, a more balanced international financial system, no more petrodollar eminence, a basket of currencies, essentially a "win-win" approach to global economic development.

 

A multipolar world also implies, by definition, NATO out of Eurasia - which is from Washington's point of view the number one reason to interfere in Ukraine. In Eurasian terms, it's as if - being booted out of Afghanistan by a bunch of peasants with Kalashnikovs - NATO was pivoting back via Ukraine.

 

While Russia and China are key strategic partners in the energy sphere - Pipelineistan and beyond - they do overlap in their race to do deals across Central Asia. Beijing is building not only one but two New Silk Roads - across Southeast Asia and across Central Asia, involving pipelines, railways and fiber optic networks, and reaching as far as Istanbul, the getaway to Europe. Yet as far as Russia-China competition for markets go, all across Eurasia, it's more under a "win-win" umbrella than a zero-sum game.

 

On Ukraine ("the last battlefield in the Cold War") and specifically Crimea, the (unspoken) official position by Beijing is absolute neutrality (re: the UN vote). Yet the real deal is support to Moscow. But this could never be out in the open, because Beijing is not interested in antagonizing the West, unless heavily provoked (the pivoting becoming hardcore encirclement, for instance). Never forget; since Deng Xiaoping ("keep a low profile") this is, and will continue to be, about China's "peaceful rise". Meanwhile, the Western dogs bark, and the Sino-Russian caravan passes.

 

 - Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007), Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge (Nimble Books, 2007), and Obama does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009).

 

 Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
PO Box 652
Brunswick, ME 04011
(207) 443-9502
globalnet@mindspring.com
www.space4peace.org
http://space4peace.blogspot.com/  (blog)

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Charles Pierce, The Well-Known Zombie War Criminal Dick Cheney.  Esquire , Reader Supported News, March 10, 2014
Pierce writes: "The producers decided that who the country really needed to hear from concerning the situation in the Ukraine was well-known zombie war criminal Dick Cheney." 
READ MORE

 

US Will Not Recognize Crimea Poll 
Luke Harding, Guardian UK, Reader Supported News, March 10, 2014 
Harding writes: "America's ambassador in Kiev said the US would refuse to recognise next Sunday's 'so-called referendum' in Crimea, and said Washington would take further steps against Russia if it used the poll to legitimise its occupation." 
READ MORE

 [Harding is the author of the new excellent new book, The Snowden Files, which recounts the suspenseful story of Snowden’s disclosure of the NSA files, but gives dramatic, clear explanations of the various institutions Snowden dealt with, from the NSA to The Guardian magazine.  This book is worth far more than its price.  –Dick]

 

 

 

 Consortium News

Ukraine: One ‘Regime Change’ Too Many?

by Ray McGovern.  Common Dreams, March 19, 2014.

Is “regime change” in Ukraine the bridge too far for the neoconservative “regime changers” of Official Washington and their sophomoric “responsibility-to-protect” (R2P) allies in the Obama administration? Have they dangerously. . .over-reached by pushing the putsch that removed duly-elected Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych?

Russian President Vladimir Putin has given an unmistakable “yes” to those questions – in deeds, not words. His message is clear: “Back off our near-frontier!”

President Barack Obama discusses Ukraine during a meeting with members of his National Security Staff in the Oval Office, Feb. 28, 2014. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

Moscow announced on Saturday that Russia’s parliament has approved Putin’s request for permission to use Russia’s armed forces “on the territory of the Ukraine pending the normalization of the socio-political situation in that country.”

Putin described this move as necessary to protect ethnic Russians and military personnel stationed in Crimea in southern Ukraine, where the Russian Black Sea Fleet and other key military installations are located. But there is no indication that the Russian parliament has restricted the use of Russian armed forces to the Crimea.

Unless Obama is completely bereft of advisers who know something about Russia, it should have been a “known-known” (pardon the Rumsfeldian mal mot) that the Russians would react this way to a putsch removing Yanukovich. It would have been a no-brainer that Russia would use military force, if necessary, to counter attempts to use economic enticement and subversive incitement to slide Ukraine into the orbit of the West and eventually NATO.

This was all the more predictable in the case of Ukraine, where Putin – although the bête noire in corporate Western media – holds very high strategic cards geographically, militarily, economically and politically.

Unlike ‘Prague Spring’ 1968

Moscow’s advantage was not nearly as clear during the short-lived “Prague Spring” of 1968 when knee-jerk, non-thinking euphoria reigned in Washington and West European capitals. The cognoscenti were, by and large, smugly convinced that reformer Alexander Dubcek could break Czechoslovakia away from the U.S.S.R.’s embrace and still keep the Russian bear at bay.

My CIA analyst portfolio at the time included Soviet policy toward Eastern Europe, and I was amazed to see analysts of Eastern Europe caught up in the euphoria that typically ended with, “And the Soviets can’t do a damned thing about it!”

That summer a new posting found me advising Radio Free Europe Director Ralph Walter who, virtually alone among his similarly euphoric colleagues, shared my view that Russian tanks would inevitably roll onto Prague’s Wenceslaus Square, which they did in late August.

Past is not always prologue. But it is easy for me to imagine the Russian Army cartographic agency busily preparing maps of the best routes for tanks into Independence Square in Kiev, and that before too many months have gone by, Russian tank commanders may be given orders to invade, if those stoking the fires of violent dissent in the western parts of Ukraine keep pushing too far.

That said, Putin has many other cards to play and time to play them. These include sitting back and doing nothing, cutting off Russia’s subsidies to Ukraine, making it ever more difficult for Yanukovich’s successors to cope with the harsh realities. And Moscow has ways to remind the rest of Europe of its dependence on Russian oil and gas.

Another Interference

There is one huge difference between Prague in 1968 and Kiev 2014. The “Prague Spring” revolution led by Dubcek enjoyed such widespread spontaneous popular support that it was difficult for Russian leaders Leonid Brezhnev and Aleksey Kosygin to argue plausibly that it was spurred by subversion from the West.

Not so 45-plus years later. In early February, as violent protests raged in the Ukrainian capital of Kiev and the White House professed neutrality, U.S. State Department officials were, in the words of NYU professor emeritus of Russian studies Stephen Cohen, “plotting a coup d’état against the elected president of Ukraine.”

We know that thanks to neocon prima donna Victoria Nuland, now Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs, who seemed intent on giving new dimension to the “cookie-pushing” role of U.S. diplomats. Recall the photo showing Nuland in a metaphor of over-reach, as she reached deep into a large plastic bag to give each anti-government demonstrator on the square a cookie before the putsch.

More important, recall her amateurish, boorish use of an open telephone to plot regime change in Ukraine with a fellow neocon, U.S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt. Crass U.S. interference in Ukrainian affairs can be seen (actually, better, heard) in an intercepted conversation posted on YouTube on Feb. 4.

Yikes! It’s Yats!

Nuland was recorded as saying: “Yats is the guy. He’s got the economic experience, the governing experience. He’s the guy you know. … Yats will need all the help he can get to stave off collapse in the ex-Soviet state. He has warned there is an urgent need for unpopular cutting of subsidies and social payments before Ukraine can improve.”

And guess what. The stopgap government formed after the coup designated Nuland’s guy Yats, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, prime minister! What luck! Yats is 39 and has served as head of the central bank, foreign minister and economic minister. And, as designated pinch-hitter-prime-minister, he has already talked about the overriding need for “responsible government,” one willing to commit “political suicide,” as he put it, by taking unpopular social measures.

U.S. meddling has been so obvious that at President Barack Obama’s hastily scheduled Friday press conference on Ukraine, Yats’s name seemed to get stuck in Obama’s throat. Toward the end of his scripted remarks, which he read verbatim, the President said: “Vice President Biden just spoke with Prime Minister [pause] – the prime minister of Ukraine to assure him that in this difficult moment the United States supports his government’s efforts and stands for the sovereignty, territorial integrity and democratic future of Ukraine.”

Obama doesn’t usually stumble like that – especially when reading a text, and is normally quite good at pronouncing foreign names. Perhaps he worried that one of the White House stenographic corps might shout out, “You mean our man, Yats?” Obama departed right after reading his prepared remarks, leaving no opportunity for such an outburst.

Western media was abuzz with the big question: Will the Russians apply military force? The answer came quickly, though President Obama chose the subjunctive mood in addressing the question on Friday.

Throwing Down a Hanky

There was a surreal quality to President Obama’s remarks, several hours after Russian (or pro-Russian) troops took control of key airports and other key installations in the Crimea, which is part of Ukraine, and home to a large Russian naval base and other key Russian military installations.

Obama referred merely to “reports of military movements taken by the Russian Federation inside of Ukraine” and warned piously that “any violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity would be deeply destabilizing.”

That Obama chose the subjunctive mood – when the indicative was, well, indicated – will not be lost on the Russians. Here was Obama, in his typically lawyerly way, trying to square the circle, giving a sop to his administration’s neocon holdovers and R2P courtiers, with a Milquetoasty expression of support for the new-Nuland-approved government (citing Biden’s assurances to old whatshisname/yatshisname).

While Obama stuck to the subjunctive tense, Prime Minister Yatsenyuk appealed to Russia to recall its forces and “stop provoking civil and military resistance in Ukraine.”

Obama’s comments seemed almost designed to sound condescending – paternalistic, even – to the Russians. Already into his second paragraph of his scripted remarks, the President took a line larded with words likely to be regarded as a gratuitous insult by Moscow, post-putsch.

“We’ve made clear that they [Russian officials] can be part of an international community’s effort to support the stability of a united Ukraine going forward, which is not only in the interest of the people of Ukraine and the international community, but also in Russia’s interest.”

By now, Russian President Vladimir Putin is accustomed to Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry, National Security Adviser Susan Rice, et al. telling the Kremlin where its interests lie, and I am sure he is appropriately grateful. Putin is likely to read more significance into these words of Obama:

“The United States will stand with the international community in affirming that there will be costs for any military intervention in Ukraine… and we will continue to coordinate closely with our European allies.”

Fissures in Atlantic Alliance

There are bound to be fissures in the international community and in the Western alliance on whether further provocation in Ukraine is advisable. Many countries have much to lose if Moscow uses its considerable economic leverage over natural gas supplies, for example.

And, aspiring diplomat though she may be, Victoria Nuland presumably has not endeared herself to the EC by her expressed “Fuck the EC” attitude.

Aside from the most servile allies of the U.S. there may be a growing caucus of Europeans who would like to return the compliment to Nuland. After all does anyone other than the most extreme neocon ideologue think that instigating a civil war on the border of nuclear-armed Russia is a good idea? Or that it makes sense to dump another economic basket case, which Ukraine surely is, on the EU’s doorstep while it’s still struggling to get its own economic house in order?

Europe has other reasons to feel annoyed about the overreach of U.S. power and arrogance. The NSA spying revelations – that continue, just like the eavesdropping itself does – seem to have done some permanent damage to transatlantic relationships.

In any case, Obama presumably knows by now that he pleased no one on Friday by reading that flaccid statement on Ukraine. And, more generally, the sooner he realizes that – without doing dumb and costly things – he can placate neither the neocons nor the R2P folks (naively well meaning though the latter may be), the better for everyone.

In sum, the Nulands of this world have bit off far more than they can chew; they need to be reined in before they cause even more dangerous harm. Broader issues than Ukraine are at stake. Like it or not, the United States can benefit from a cooperative relationship with Putin’s Russia – the kind of relationship that caused Putin to see merit last summer in pulling Obama’s chestnuts out of the fire on Syria, for example, and in helping address thorny issues with Iran.

© 2014 Consortium News

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in Washington, DC. During his career as a CIA analyst, he prepared and briefed the President's Daily Brief and chaired National Intelligence Estimates. He is a member of the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals.

 

UKRAINE, RUSSIA, FOSSIL FUELS, US/NATO ROLE

Global Network [globalnet@mindspring.com]

Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:11 AM

LIGHTING THE FIRES FOR CHAOS IN UKRAINE

 

 A couple of people have wondered if I exaggerated the possibility of war with Russia over Ukraine.  I don't think so - in fact I would suggest that the proxy war is already underway.

Two of the first things that happened following the
US led coup d'etat in Ukraine was the "new government" declaring that the Russian language would be outlawed in the country (which has millions of Russians in it) and that the ban on Nazi symbols and ideology would be lifted.  It cannot be said often enough that many of the violent agitators in Kiev were in fact the ultra-nationalist descendants of those Ukrainian Nazi sympathizers who supported Hitler's invasion of the former Soviet Union during WW II.

But there is even more.  
NSNBC International reports the following:

Being one of the most reliable sources of information about the activities of Turkey’s intelligence service MIT and Turkey’s armed forces, Aydinlik Daily quotes a “source that has spoken with the newspaper”, alleging, that an intelligence unit linked to Turkey’s intelligence service MIT has headed to the Ukrainian Autonomous Republic Crimea to provoke Crimean Turks to act against the ethnic Russian majority and Russian interests in the autonomous republic. The source reported that the deployment of the Turkish unit has been coordinated with both the USA and EU.


Translated this essentially means that for all the moralistic talk coming from the Obama administration about how Russia should not be intervening in Crimea, the US-NATO are, and have been, deeply embedded in the drive to take over Ukraine.

Russian intelligence obviously is aware that this "low intensity" warfare is now being directed by US-NATO.  That is why Putin asked his governing body for permission to move Russian forces into the Crimea to stabilize the situation.  

I am indeed a lifelong peace activist.  I don't support war.  But I also have always believed that someone under attack has the right to defend himself or herself.  Whether they were the Native Americans; people in Nicaragua being attacked by the US funded and trained Contras; the Syrian government now under attack by a CIA and Saudi Arabian funded and trained Al Qaeda forces; or anywhere else - they have a right to defend their lands.  

This morning I watched a bit of mainstream TV news just to get a feel for what the talking heads were saying.  Here are some of the things I heard:

  • We must put economic sanctions on Russia
  • Putin does "not care" what the US thinks
  • We must "roll back this Russian invasion"
  • Putin is not in touch with reality
  • It's almost like we are dealing with North Korea
  • Putin is "unstable"
  • There is "confusion in Moscow"
  • Putin is clumsy
  • There could be a military collision
  • US should help bail out Ukraine

The video of Victoria Nuland speaking last December, on a stage decorated with the logos of ExxonMobil and Chevron, is particularly important as she reveals that the US "invested" $5 billion in this coup d'etat.  There can be no doubt that the US-NATO have pulled this stunt and is that not a violation of international law to destabilize and overthrow an elected government?  (Even if you don't approve of it?)  Is that not an act of war toward neighboring Russia and would not Russia have the right to take measures to stabilize the situation?

Yesterday I watched a 
video from a news conference where Ukrainian Navy Rear Admiral Berezovsky (who had just been appointed to that post by the "new revolutionary government" in Kiev) had come to Crimea and announced that he was not going to support the coup d'etat and instead pledged himself to the Crimean government, which is allied to Russia.  The mainstream American media this morning was spinning that story by saying Berozovsky had "surrendered" to Russia.

As you can see on the map above this whole situation is about natural gas and oil.  Russia's huge supplies of natural gas are shipped to Europe and other locations by pipelines that run throughout Ukraine.  ExxonMobil, Chevron and other western oil majors want control of these resources.  Like we've seen in Iraq, Libya, Venezuela and other places that have natural resources, Mr. Big is quite willing to destabilize and go to war if necessary to grab these resources. This is a long-term project by the US-NATO and they are just getting started.

Mr. Big is a bully and when anyone stands up to the bully they will be demonized.  

 Bruce K. Gagnon
Coordinator
Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space
PO Box 652
Brunswick, ME 04011
(207) 443-9502
globalnet@mindspring.com
www.space4peace.org
http://space4peace.blogspot.com/  (blog)

 

 

John Pilger: The Forgotten Coup - and How the Same Godfather Rules From Canberra to Kiev

Tuesday, 18 March 2014 09:51 By John Pilger, Truthout | News Analysis

Ukrainian police with riot gear guard the regional administration building from pro-Russia demonstrators in the center of Kharkiv, Ukraine, March 16, 2014. With thousands of heavily-armed Russian troops occupying the perennially embattled peninsula, the voters of Crimea went to the polls in a public referendum on secession from Ukraine that Western leaders have declared illegal and vowed to punish with economic sanctions. (Photo: Tyler Hicks/The New York Times)

Since 1945, dozens of governments, many of them democracies, have met a fate similar to that of the elected government of the Ukraine, usually with bloodshed, says John Pilger.

Washington's role in the fascist putsch against an elected government in Ukraine will surprise only those who watch the news and ignore the historical record.  Since 1945, dozens of governments, many of them democracies, have met a similar fate, usually with bloodshed.

Nicaragua is one of the poorest countries on earth with fewer people than Wales, yet under the reformist Sandinistas in the 1980s, it was regarded in Washington as a "strategic threat." The logic was simple; if the weakest slipped the leash, setting an example, who else would try their luck?

The great game of dominance offers no immunity for even the most loyal US"ally." This is demonstrated by perhaps the least known of Washington's coups - in Australia. The story of this forgotten coup is a salutary lesson for those governments that believe a "Ukraine" or a "Chile" could never happen to them.

Australia's deference to the United States makes Britain, by comparison, seem a renegade. During the American invasion of Vietnam - which Australia had pleaded to join - an official in Canberra voiced a rare complaint to Washington that the British knew more about US objectives in that war than its antipodean comrade-in-arms. The response was swift: "We have to keep the Brits informed to keep them happy. You are with us come what may."

This dictum was rudely set aside in 1972 with the election of the reformist Labor government of Gough Whitlam.  Although not regarded as of the left, Whitlam - now in his 98th year - was a maverick social democrat of principle, pride, propriety and extraordinary political imagination. He believed that a foreign power should not control his country's resources and dictate its economic and foreign policies. He proposed to "buy back the farm" and speak as a voice independent of London and Washington.

On the day after his election, Whitlam ordered that his staff should not be "vetted or harassed" by the Australian security organization, ASIO - then, as now, beholden to Anglo-American intelligence. When his ministers publicly condemned the Nixon/Kissinger administration as "corrupt and barbaric," Frank Snepp, a CIA officer stationed in Saigon at the time, recalled: "We were told the Australians might as well be regarded as North Vietnamese collaborators."

Victor Marchetti, the CIA officer who had helped set up Pine Gap - a joint US-Australian satellite tracking station in the center of Australia - later told me a "threat to close Pine Gap caused apoplexy in the White House. Consequences were inevitable . . . a kind of Chile was set in motion."

The CIA had just helped General Pinochet crush the democratic government of another reformer, Salvador Allende, in Chile.

In 1974, the White House sent Marshall Green to Canberra as ambassador. Green was an imperious, very senior and sinister figure in the State Department who worked in the shadows of America's "deep state." Known as the "coupmaster," he had played a central role in the 1965 coup against President Sukarno in Indonesia - which cost up to a million lives. One of his first speeches in Australia was to the Australian Institute of Directors and was described by an alarmed member of the audience as "an incitement to the country's business leaders to rise against the government".

Pine Gap's top-secret messages were decoded in California by a CIA contractor, TRW. One of the decoders was a young Christopher Boyce, an idealist who, troubled by the "deception and betrayal of an ally," became a whistleblower. Boyce revealed that the CIA had infiltrated the Australian political and trade union elite and referred to the Governor-General of Australia, Sir John Kerr, as "our man Kerr."

MORE

http://truth-out.org/news/item/22527-the-forgotten-coup-and-how-the-same-godfather-rules-from-canberra-to-kiev

Copyright, Truthout. May not be reprinted without permission.

John Pilger

John Pilger is an Australian-born, London-based journalist, filmmaker and author. For his foreign and war reporting, ranging from Vietnam and Cambodia to the Middle East, he has twice won Britain's highest award for journalism. For his documentary films, he won a British Academy Award and an American Emmy. In 2009, he was awarded Australia's human rights prize, the Sydney Peace Prize. His most recent film, Utopia, will be broadcast at 10:35 PM December 19, 2013, on ITV in Britain and will open in Australia in January 2014.www.johnpilger.com

 

 

 

Ukraine Is About Oil. So Was World War I 
Robert Freeman, Common Dreams, Reader Supported News, March 8, 2014 
Freeman writes: "Ukraine is a lot more portentous than it appears. It is fundamentally about the play for Persian Gulf oil. So was World War I. The danger lies in the chance of runaway escalation, just like World War I." 
READ MORE

 

 

MARK SWANEY (leader of Arkansas’ Green Party)

ANALYSIS BY MARK SWANEY  3-9-14

Dr. Bennett,

 

I am certainly no expert on the situation; however, of course, I do have some ideas on what I read from both the mass media and the opposition.  Here it is.  First, there are factors other than the familiar argument that this conflict is about resources, specifically natural gas pipelines.   I don’t discount that. The oil and gas companies, the carbon energy industry, are always interested in whatever carbon resources may become available to them – that is true wherever there are carbon resources (everywhere), whatever the situation.

 

In addition the driving factors in this particular, current “crisis” in Ukraine and Russia are two. 

 

One – politics.  Putin seeks to restore Russia to its previous position before the breakup in 1990.  He, and every other future leader of Russia, will (foolishly) want to do that like water wants to run down hill.   And, just as naturally, the USA, foolishly, will seek to inhibit Russia from regaining its’ “lost” territory.  Also, there is the tattered remains of the principal of not using force to change national boundaries, and instead resorting to the UN to settle problems. The USA is trying (in this case) to defend that principal.  However, after Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Panama, Grenada, and so on, the USA has lost its claim to righteousness in this area, so Kerry’s fulminations fall on deaf ears overseas, even among our allies.  That might be a good thing.

 

Two – ethnic conflict.  This is the triggering cause.  Ukraine is not ethnically homogenous, and in eastern Europe (think the former Yugoslavia) ethnic differences are taken very, very, seriously, and for the good reason that such differences have resulted in huge amounts of bloodshed in the past when one group dominated the government and generally abused the other group(s) in the country.  So, for political reasons, the USA is backing one side of an ethnic conflict.  Those people we are backing are not necessarily protesting, engaging in an uprising/revolution, because they are being, or have been, oppressed by Russia.  They want to rule the roost, they were outvoted in the last election in 2010, and they wanted to, and have, reversed that election.  I think that the real motives of the “western” Ukrainians was demonstrated when you note that they voted to outlaw the Russian language.  This was highly provocative, and I think was an important factor in the counter-revolution that Russia has taken to “defending” in Crimea.

 

What should we be advocating?  Well, I think we should advocate a UN solution.  That won’t likely happen because the UN can be stymied by the veto of Russia in the Security Council, nevertheless, there should be an effort made through the General Assembly.  I think also that the actual real, and practical solution has already happened and can’t be reversed, and should not be, and that is that Russia keeps the Crimea.  That is what the majority of the people there want, so why is it a problem?  There will be a referendum in Crimea that Russia will win, why challenge it, especially since there is nothing that we can do about it?

 

We should advocate against sanctions against Russia.  No blood has been spilled in Crimea, the Russians have not killed people.  With some cooler heads prevailing, (they will have to since we have no other option) the status of Crimea should be allowed to remain as it is – Crimea should be recognized as part of Russia.  Sanctions against this action of Putin’s are overkill, will hurt us and Russia, may cause a new “cold war” that is in no one’s interest, and sanctions are in any case not going to be effective.  Putin should not have acted in the precipitous manner that he did.  It was clumsy, typical of Russia.  He could have gotten all that he wanted without the drama, but the Russians are nothing if not clumsy and dramatic.  The USA should not have turned the situation into an “us vs them” type of issue – the ethnic aspirations of the western Ukrainians are just not worth it. 

 

I see no reason that Russia and the USA should not be allies.  Putin is a thug, a gangster, and a crude fellow.  In other words, a typical world leader.  We should make a deal with Russia, as it will strengthen our ability to influence the Russian public opinion, which will make it harder, not easier, for Putin to gain support inside Russia itself.  All we are doing now with these histrionics of Kerry and Obama (mostly for domestic politic considerations), is to strengthen Putin in the eyes of the average Russian, something that is not in our interest.  We are, again, shooting ourselves in the foot.

 

Mark

 

 

 

[haw-info] HAW Notes 3/13/14: Links to recent articles of interest

haw-info-bounces@stopthewars.org on behalf of Jim O'Brien [jimobrien48@gmail.com]

 

Links to Recent Articles of Interest

 

"Ukraine Between 'Popular Uprising for Democracy' and 'Fascist Putsch'"

By David Mandel, MRZine, posted March 12

 

"America's Dien Bien Phu Syndrome"

By John Prados, History News Network, posted March 12

 

"We're Just Not That Special: What the Crisis with Russia Reveals about USA's Age-Old Self-Obsession"

By Andrew J. Bacevich, Politico Magazine, posted March 5

The author teaches history and international relations at BostonUniversity.

 

"Ukraine, Putin, and the West"

By "The Editors" (of n + 1 magazine), posted March 5

An in-depth article steeped in history. The website lists the editors as Carla Blumenkranz, Keith Gessen, and Nikil Saval.

 

“Ukraine–A Fight We Can’t Win and Russia Can’t Lose”

By John A. Mazis, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, posted March 5

The author teaches history at HamlineUniversity.

 

 

THE FOLLOWING WERE SENT TO ME BY COMMON DREAMS MARCH 8, 2014


News & Views | 03.07.14

Anxiety Grows for Ukrainians as US/Russia Battle for Clout
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/03/07

Norman Solomon: Hillary Clinton on Putin: Playing a Dog-Eared “Hitler” Card
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/03/07

Ira Chernus: American Fantasies Put Ukrainian Lives at Risk
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/03/07-0

Robert Parry: The ‘We-Hate-Putin’ Group Think
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/03/07-2

 


THE FOLLOWING WERE SENT TO ME BY FAIR TV ON MARCH 8, 2014

·Russia, Ukraine and 'US Prestige'

·Putin's 'Delusions' and Double Standards

·Denying the Far-Right Role in the Ukrainian Revolution

·FAIR TV: Ukraine Hysteria, US Hypocrisy, Keystone Protest

 

 

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #220, MARCH 12, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #220, MARCH 12, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett.

Stopping the Ukraine War, Ending the Gaza Genocide, Opposing Imperial Incarceration

Jeffrey Sachs.  “Negotiating Lasting Peace in Ukraine.”

David Swanson.  “The Five Excuses for Genocide

Benjamin Weber.  American Purgatory: Prison Imperialism and the Rise of Mass Incarceration.

 

Jeffrey Sachs.  “Negotiating Lasting Peace in Ukraine.”  Consortium News (3-7-25). 
Ukraine will have to cede more territory than it would have in April 2022 — when the U.S. and U.K. talked it out of a peace deal — but it will gain sovereignty and international security arrangements. Read here...

 

“The Five Excuses for Genocide[in Gaza].   By David Swanson, World BEYOND War, March 4, 2025
https://worldbeyondwar.org/the-five-excuses-for-genocide/

[Forwarded by Sonny San Juan March 5, 2025, Aipac interview:: Trying to explain genocide of Gaza.]

On Monday I interviewed a member of the Executive Committee of AIPAC. I asked him how he could defend and promote apartheid and genocide. He was not a legal witness; I could not order him not to change the subject. Still, he provided pretty clear (if very weak) excuses for genocide, which I think can be broken up into five types. . . .    -David Swanson is executive director of WorldBeyondWar.org and campaign coordinator for RootsAction.org. Swanson's books include War Is A Lie. He blogs at DavidSwanson.org. He hosts Talk World Radio.

US  IMPERIALISM, WARS, AND PRISONS
Benjamin Weber.  American Purgatory: Prison Imperialism and the Rise of Mass Incarceration.   The New Press, 2023.
Publisher’s description: 
A groundbreaking look at how America exported mass incarceration around the globe.    American Purgatory will forever change how we understand the rise of mass incarceration. It will forever change how we understand this country.” —Clint Smith, bestselling author of How the Word Is Passed: A  Reckoning with the History of Slavery Across America.   In this explosive new book, historian Benjamin Weber reveals how the story of American prisons is inextricably linked to the expansion of American power around the globe.   A vivid work of hidden history that spans the wars to subjugate Native Americans in the mid-nineteenth century, the conquest of the western territories, and the creation of an American empire in Panama, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines, American Purgatory reveals how “prison imperialism”—the deliberate use of prisons to control restive, subject populations—is written into our national DNA, extending through to our modern era of mass incarceration. Weber also uncovers a surprisingly rich history of prison resistance, from the Seminole Chief Osceola to Assata Shakur—one that invites us to rethink the scope of America’s long freedom struggle.

 

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #222, March 17, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #222, March 17, 2025. Compiled by Dick Bennett

A Nation Divided? Over the Science?

Lertzman.  “The US Has Never Been More Divided On Climate.

Mazza. Building Solidarity Around Survival: A Seattle Example.

New Articles and Reviews of Books in Climate and Capitalism.


“The US Has Never Been More Divided On Climate

By Dr. Renée Lertzman, DeSmog. Popular Resistance.org (3-10-25).  In the autumn of 2014, I was sitting in a tiny shed at a writing residency in Point Reyes, Northern California. I was there to write my book about the psychology of facing planetary crises. One particularly warm afternoon, I was looking out at Tomales Bay, teeming with bird life, when my phone rang with an unknown Washington DC number. Grateful for any distraction, I took the call. The fast-talking man on the other end of the line introduced himself as a senior advisor to the Republican Party. Let’s call him “Bob” (not his real name). -more-
 

Building Solidarity Around Survival: A Seattle Example

By Patrick Mazza, Resilience. Popular Resistance.org (3-10-25).  We are in for a long hard time in the U.S. and the world as a whole.  The buildup of problems either unaddressed or insufficiently addressed has mounted to an overwhelming extent. The ascendancy of Trump and Musk has intensified the situation, but the trends were going the wrong way for a long time before. It is enough to make people throw up their hands in despair, wondering what they can do.   Or there’s Seattle.   -more-

 

NEW ARTICLES and Reviews of Books IN CLIMATE & CAPITALISM (3-12-25).

Ethanol is just comically inefficient solar energy.     Source 
To save the environment, we must end the profit system
What's stopping a transition to renewable energy?
Earth's water cycle is off balance for the first time in human history
Ecosocialist Bookshelf, March 2025.   From the Bookshelf: Martin Crook.  CAPITALISM, COLONISATION AND THE ECOCIDE-GENOCIDE NEXUS.  University of London Press..
Focusing on the former British colonies of Kenya and Australia, Crook examines the drivers of ecologically induced genocide—environmental destruction resulting in conditions of life that fundamentally threaten a social group’s cultural or physical existence. Putting forward a political economy of genocide, he enriches our understanding of genocide colonisation, and the capitalist mode of production that underpins developmentalism.

 

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #221, MARCH 19, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #221, MARCH 19, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett

Bayard Rustin, Opponent of War.
Origins of US Wars.  Everyone a Historian.
The Mother of US Wars: Westward Conquest.

March 17 was the birthday of Bayard Rustin, civil rights organizer (1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom), pacifist, socialist, and gay advocate.   UAF’s Black Studies Program is partly supported by an endowment from OMNI.

THE ORIGINS OF US WARS?   Become a scholar historian. 
Despite being the most wealthy and heavily armed empire in the history of the world, the agencies and think tanks whose task it is to justify that empire have produced no more numerous publications than have its opponents, and generally have exhibited less quality, for one main reason: The defenders of the warmakers usually do not dig deeply enough into the etiology of US wars.  Regarding each US war, ask yourself: Who and What started it, and you will discover, in varying degrees, doubts about the veracity of the warmakers and about the accuracy of the narrative they promulgate.  When and why did WWII start in the Pacific?  Well, start with Pearl Harbor with the official story if you wish, but then move backwards in time.  Peel off the layers of causation.   When and why did the Ukraine War begin?  Ok, start with Russia’s “invasion” of the two provinces called the Donbass, but then dig back to 2014 and before for the full truth.    For accurate, fact-based, scholarly answers, see my anthologies and weeklies on war after war.   Our leaders will continue to start wars until the public gets informed, refuses to be complicit, and stops them. 

Consider our Biggest War, the US Genocidal War Against Native Americans (by late 19th century 12 million reduced to fewer than one).   Empire and Popular Arts: A Note on Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz’s “Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States.”   Monthly Review’s reviewof Roxanne Dunbar Ortiz’s Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States: A Graphic Interpretation, written by Dylan Davis and Paul Buhle, with illustrations from the book by illustrator Paul Peart-Smith.  more…     Source

OMNI TRUMP, AUTHORITARIANISM, AUTOCRACY, FASCISM, NAZISM ANTHOLOGY #1, March 20, 2025

$
0
0

 

OMNI

INSURRECTION ANTHOLOGY

January 2, 2021

OMNI TRUMP, AUTHORITARIANISM, AUTOCRACY, FASCISM, NAZISM ANTHOLOGY #1, March 20, 2025

https://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2022/01/omni-insurrection-anthology-january-2.html

Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace, Justice, and Ecology

Omnicenter.org/donate/

 

What’s at Stake:  Recently when I began editing articles and books into a new Anthology on Trump and Fascism, I realized my Anthology on “Trump’s Insurrection” constituted a first Trump-Fascism Anthology.  Among the lessons of these anthologies are how fragile is our “democracy” and how long and how emphatically we have been warned.

 

OMNI: INSURRECTION ANTHOLOGY January 2, 2021, go to https://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2022/01/omni-insurrection-anthology-january-2.html
This anthology gathers articles, books, and films that indict Trump for attempting to foment an insurrection and in many other ways to replace our democracy with autocracy.  The collection begins with the PBS Frontline/ProPublica documentary, American Insurrection, includes special attention to Costa and Woodward’s book Peril, and ends with American Nero:The History of the Destruction of the Rule of Law, and Why Trump Is the Worst Offenderby Richard Painter and Peter Golenbock and my recommendation of Benjamin Hett’s The Death of Democracy in Weimar in 3 years.

 

CONTENTS of TRUMP AUTHORITARIANISM, AUTOCRACY, FASCISM, NAZISM ANTHOLOGY #1(the Insurrection)
PBS Frontline, American Insurrection

NYT, “The Politics of Menace.”

NPR, Fresh Air, Trump’s Strategy, Next Time

Robert Costa and Bob Woodward, Peril

Alfred McCoy, To Govern the Globe and “An American Coup”

Karen Greenberg, Subtle Tools

Robert Kagan, “Our Constant Crisis Is Already Here”

Kate Woodsome, “How the Capitol Attack Unfolded,” Washington Post

Jeremy Kuzmarov, “Was the January 6th a Dress Rehearsal for a Coup d’État”?

Dick, Trump’s Ongoing Attempted Coup Increasingly Autocratic

Joshua Cho, US Media and Trump’s Coup Attempt

Gregory Krieg, CNN, “Trump’s Attempt to Steal the Election”

Ezra Klein, “Trump is Attempting a Coup in Plain Sight”

Two Books Recommended by George Paulson:

  Mazower, Hitler’s Empire

  Childers, The Third Reich

Painter and Golenbock, American Nero, rev. by Dahlia Lithwick

Dick, Benjamin Hett’s The Death of Democracy

https://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2022/01/omni-insurrection-anthology-january-2.html


OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #223, March 24, 2025.

$
0
0

 

OMNI CLIMATE MEMO MONDAYS #223, March 24, 2025.  Compiled by Dick Bennett

Yale Climate Connections February 28 - March 6, 2025.

 

 

 

As the politics of climate change shift, how can ordinary people respond?  Goodbye, Paris Agreement; hello, National Energy Dominance Council, the body tasked with carrying out the Trump administration’s fossil-fuel-forward agenda.   [Here’s another organization fighting back.  –D]
Nathaniel Stinnett founded the Environmental Voter Project in 2015, aiming to convince more people who care about climate change to engage with the electoral process. 
Keep reading.

 

More articles published this week
NOAA Hurricane Hunter layoffs threaten to degrade hurricane forecasts
‘We know what it’s like’: How Appalachian towns are learning to help each other after floods
These climate newsletters can help you stay informed
12 books to help you create a just and sustainable future  [I’ll try to feature some of these books in later CMM.  Here’s the first on the list. --D] 

 

People the Planet Needs Now: Voices for Justice, Science and a Future of Promise by Dudley Edmundson (Adventure Books 2025, 264 pages).   Heroes among us are fighting for a better world – and many of them are Black, Indigenous, and Other People of Color (BIPOC). Acclaimed author and photographer Dudley Edmondson has interviewed 25 Black and Brown scientists, environmental justice activists, and social justice activists to inspire change on a global scale. Along with the full-color photographs, his book offers a rare opportunity to see and hear from BIPOC scientists and activists about problems with “traditional” science and the current methods of addressing everything from climate change to city design. Black and Brown people around the globe have an interdependent relationship with nature, and their perspectives can help us push for positive change. People the Planet Needs Now strives to inspire difference-makers to create a better world together.

Donate

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #222, MARCH 26, 2025.

$
0
0

 

 

OMNI WAR WATCH WEDNESDAYS, #222, MARCH 26, 2025.   Compiled by Dick Bennett


Ralph Nader.  Resisting “Trump’s Tyranny.”
Maria Ressa.  How to Stand Up to a Dictator: The Fight for Our Future.

 

“Stay Silent and Stay Powerless Against Trump’s Tyranny”

by Ralph Nader.  Facebook,  March 14, 2025.    (forwarded by Joanie Connors to OMNI Open Forum)

There are reasons why influential or knowledgeable Americans are staying silent as the worsening fascist dictatorship of the Trumpsters and Musketeers gets more entrenched by the day. Most of these reasons are simple cover for cowardice. . . .

Don’t self-censoring people know that they are helping the Trumpian dread, threat and fear machine get worse? Study Germany and Italy in the nineteen thirties.

The Trump/Musk lawless, cruel, arrogant, dictatorial regime is in our White House. Their police state infrastructure is in place. Silence is complicity!

[https://nader.org/.../stay-silent-and-stay-powerless.../](https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnader.org%2F2025%2F03%2F14%2Fstay-silent-and-stay-powerless-against-trumps-tyranny%2F%3Ffbclid%3DIwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR2a7H1yQdXYMwFWOtuIbCMW3Bcz0t71_uXgIhAuswGQBVkA_BeWnmDAjPc_aem_qiU5b_kkef0At-8ZpLwVmQ&h=AT1jY-lE7qrSI7NeVdtxwygTb-p2H7rcVhsX8stRIIUk-tY8hSF2qBADmzTZHibMQjZJXuWPbPtUZ6vvQHSBM5hDpLTIl3wJ1x2E9SqbfbcUsArTMGhvrSOMAIOFO0DTUhKBCF3ZNR81PQ&__tn__=-UK-y-R&c[0]=AT1n5jxCgxs6CDCCf_UQiepAegbh9kCYYeKOZl_lSKn6-_l_ry3XumluqxRSHpIFYUeez7e4f-pL4ASESrqeJlO7eA3amAadYJgHUwg37-meTZgqw4OMArpxn3ipXxcJJkftoEPMnxL8XdkaZwJHqHQ7NG-iMu6us1MRiPQESb9idDnsNgoMpvhNjTEifU-Job3nDJ4YfgYnu0Zs3D6-77Oyd1wMP6SeOaUuL3q6YeMcq_TV1TldfaWvMWXVQoJRzC7gjcFaXA)

 

Maria Ressa.  How to Stand Up to a Dictator: The Fight for Our Future.   Harper, 2022.   The title reveals only a part of the book.  The Philippine dictator Duterte gained control of the digital media to capture the three branches of government. The first half of the book describes how Duterte rapidly took control of the digital media and the three branches of government.  “Within six months of Duterte’s taking power in the Philippines, the checks and balances of the three branches of government—executive, legislatie, and judicial—collapsed through a system of patronage, blind loyalty, and what I started calling the ‘three C,s: corrupt, coerce, co-opt.  If anyone refused what the government desired or offered..., they were attacked” via the media by Duterte’s propaganda machine.  “We didn’t grasp that Facebook, the website that millions of people still believed fostered community and connection, had supplanted traditional media.  We didn’t realize that those ‘content creators’ . . .now passed as political pundits, even as journalists reporting ‘facts.’  Those accounts were at the core of a propaganda machine that bullied and harassed its targets and incited followers to violence.  The same thing happened with Stop the Steal in the United States….”  (157-58).  Ressa founded Rappler, the Philippines’ top digital-only news site, and won the Nobel Peace Prize.    --Dick

OMNI TRUMP AUTHORITARIAN, TOTALITARIAN, AUTOCRACY, FASCISM, NAZISM ANTHOLOGY #2

$
0
0

 

OMNI

TRUMP AUTHORITARIAN, TOTALITARIAN, AUTOCRACY, FASCISM, NAZISM ANTHOLOGY #2

March 27, 2025

Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace, Justice, Ecology, and the Idea of Democracy

https://omnicenter.org/donate/

 

What’s at Stake:  Observers were studying currents of US authoritarianism in the 1930s as Sinclair Lewis’ novel It Can’t Happen Here illustrates, long before Trump appeared in his first term Jan. 20, 2017.    Defenders of the US idea of democracy have had a long time to build its structure, yet it seems fragile under Trump’s onslaught.              

 

 

CONTENTS

2008

Myerson and Roberto.  “Fascism and the Crisis of Pax American.”

2016

John Broich.  We Asked Sixteen Historians.

Noam Chomsky

    Heather Saul.  Noam Chomsky’s Assessment of Trump.
    Josh Jones.  Chomsky on Trump and Weimar Republic 1930s.

2017
Awareness in the 1930s.
Michael Roberto.  “The Origins of American Fascism.”

Two Articles by John Bellamy Foster.
    Neofascism in the White House.”
    “This Is Not Populism.”

David Edwards.  “Trump Uses Mein Kampf.”
John Diaz.  Trump’s Authoritarian Playbook.

Ron Leighton.  Study the Context of US Authoritarianism of Last 50 Years.

 

2018

Benjamin C. Hett: Interview and Review The Death of Democracy.
Robin Limeley.  The Fate of the Weimar Republic.

Timothy Snyder.  Review of Hett’s book.  How Did the Nazis Gain Power in Germany?”

Heather Gray.  Intro. to Richard Frankel.   “German History and Trump's Enablers.”  
Juan Cole.  Trump and Erdogan.

Robert Reich.  Trump and the “Deep State”: A Second Civil War?
Arkansas Democrat Gazette.  Trump Orders More Arms.

 

2019

Christian Fuchs.  On Henry Giroux’s Book The Terror of the Unforeseen.”  See articles above by Frankel, Snyder, Leighton.

 Ref.  Henry Giroux.  “Neoliberal Fascism.” 

2020
David Renton.  Fascism.

 

2025

Chris Hedges.  Collapse of Universities and Suppression of Speech.

Volker Ulrich.  Hitler: Ascent, 1889-1939.

 

 

TEXTS
TRUMP AUTHORITARIANISM, AUTOCRACY, FASCISM, NAZISM, #2  from 2008 to 2025.

[These articles have been placed in the chronological order of their publication, beginning in 2008.   The opening poem serves as a general introduction.]

2007

“PITY THE NATION” by Lawrence Ferlinghetti.
Beat poet Lawrence Ferlinghetti is the co-founder of the iconic City Lights Bookstore in San Francisco. He wrote this poem in 2007. 

Pity The Nation
Pity the nation whose people are sheep,
and whose shepherds mislead them.
Pity the nation whose leaders are liars, whose sages are silenced,
and whose bigots haunt the airwaves.
Pity the nation that raises not its voice,
except to praise conquerors and acclaim the bully as hero
and aims to rule the world with force and by torture.
Pity the nation that knows no other language but its own
and no other culture but its own.
Pity the nation whose breath is money
and sleeps the sleep of the too well fed.
Pity the nation — oh, pity the people who allow their rights to erode
and their freedoms to be washed away.
My country, tears of thee, sweet land of liberty.

Forwarded by Bob Billig  6-17-18

 

2008

Gregory Meyerson and Michael J. Roberto.  “Fascism and the Crisis of Pax Americana.”  Socialism and Democracy 22, no. 2 (2008). 
I was unable to copy/paste this article.  Here is my typed copy of the final half of the opening paragraph:  “. . .the terrorist attacks in September, 2001 and the [Bush admin.] invasion of Iraq 18 months later turned a protracted crisis into an acute stage, thereby setting into motion an intensification of fascist processes,which could, in time, become the basis for a distinct fascist trajectory” (My emphasis of their careful choice of terms.  This heavily footnoted article  shows how widely this tendency was already being criticized by 2008.    See #3 on Naomi Wolf’s The End of America (2007) and several other publications.  The authors also connect with Sinclair Lewis’ 1930s prediction that fascism would come to the United States wrapped not with swastika or in brown shirts, but in the American flag and bearing a Christian cross,)

 

2016

 

“We Asked 16 Historians If They Think Trump Is a Fascist. This Is What They Said” 

http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/164170

John Broich is an associate professor in the history department at Case Western Reserve University where he teaches WWII history from the British Empire perspective.

Related Link The Führer and the Donald: The Ghost of a Resemblance By Nicholas O’Shaughnessy.

. . .I raised the issue with sixteen historians of fascist-era Germany, Italy, Japan, and Spain, asking whether they would define Trump as a fascist and leaving them to decide how broadly they defined the term.

The vast majority did not consider Trump a fascist, with the most common specific objection that Trump does not lead a coherent movement with a specific ethos.“He has no normal political organization as distinct from a publicity team,” responded Stanley Payne, a noted authority on fascism history. “The major fascist movements certainly did, almost by definition.”

The second most common objection was that Trump is not undergirded by a paramilitary or that he does not advocate more political violence, granting his comments about “Second Amendment people.”

A few scholars said the definition of fascism is so limited that it cannot be applied outside the context of the 1920s-1940s. “As I see it,” David D. Roberts wrote, “fascism was a trajectory or process that exhausted itself.”

Most of the historians I asked named many similarities between Trump and Hitler, as Kakutani seemed to do, but almost all qualified them as particulars or matters of rhetorical style rather than sufficient proof of fascism. 

About half thought a comparison with Mussolini was more apt. They cited Trump’s “I and I alone” demagoguery, his “exaggerated masculinity,” his attempt to synthesize notions of the left and right, his stress on leading a movement instead of a party, and his claim to be uniquely outside the system.  

Instead of finding the similarities between Trump and Hitler convincing, many of the respondents found it far more compelling to compare the historical moments in which fascism and Trump arose. Academic historians’ focus on context should not be surprising since they are masters at analyzing the contexts for past events, trends, and people. It’s how they explain how things came to be.

Harvard historian of modern Japan, Andrew Gordon, told me that he thinks there are “overlaps” in “the contexts that in the past are understood to have generated fascism or support for it and in the context of the US today.” 

“Trump has tapped into some impulses or segments of American society that resemble fascist impulses and constituencies,” wrote Michael Ebner, an expert on Mussolini’s Italy at Syracuse, like, “Xenophobia, focus on internal enemies of the nation, … protectionism.”

Professor Marla Stone, author of The Fascist Revolution in Italyresponded that she is struck by comparisons to the German and Italian contexts in which so many were “willing to support a candidate who clearly states his intention to rule outside the confines of democracy. The loss of faith in democratic institutions and the democratic process is a striking similarity. . . .”   MORE

 

Two Articles on Noam Chomsky 2016

Heather Saul.  “Noam Chomsky dismisses 'megalomaniac' Donald Trump.” The Independent,Thursday 01 December 2016.  http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/noam-chomsky-dismisses-megalomaniac-donald-trump-a7449151.html 

Noam Chomsky has branded Donald Trump an “ignorant, megalomaniac” with no clear positions whose election has energised neo-Nazis around the world.  

Speaking to Al-Jazeera, the celebrated American philosopher and linguist delivered a scathing assessment of Mr Trump’s ability to lead America and gave a bleak outlook on the turbulence and instability the future will hold after his ascendency to power. . . .

But there were aspects of the US election Chomsky does feel encouraged by. Bernie Sanders has an overwhelming majority among young people which he says could be a “positive portent” for the future, he continued. 

Chomsky has been a vocal critic of Mr Trump and declared the Republican party “the most dangerous organisation in world history” with him at the helm. “The party is dedicated to racing as rapidly as possible to destruction of organised human life," he said in October. "There is no historical precedent for such a stand."
 

Josh Jones.  Noam Chomsky on Whether the Rise of Trump Resembles the Rise of Fascism in 1930s Germany.”  Open Culture.   May 30. 2016. 

in History, Politics| May 30th, 2016 26 Comments

http://www.openculture.com/2016/05/noam-chomsky-on-whether-the-rise-of-trump-resembles-the-rise-of-fascism-in-1930s-germany.html

. . . Comparisons to Hitler and Mussolini may have worn out their usefulness in elections past—frivolous as they often were—but the Trump campaign’s overt demagoguery, vicious misogyny, racism, violent speech, actual violence, complete disregard for truth, threats to free speech, and simplistic, macho cult of personality have prompted plausible shouts of fascism from every corner. . . .

At the top of the post, Noam Chomsky (MIT professor and author of the new book, Who Rules the World?) weighs in, with his analysis of the “generalized rage” of “mainly working class, middle class, and poor white males” and their “traditional families” coalescing around Trump. (Anyone who objects to Chomsky’s characterization of Trump as a circus clown should take a moment to revisit his reality show career and performance in the WWE ring, not to mention those debates.)

In Chomsky’s assessment, we need only look to U.S. history to find the kind of “strong” racialized nativism Trump espouses, from Benjamin Franklin’s aversion to German and Swedish immigrants, who were “not pure Anglo-Saxons like us,” to later parties like the 19th century Know Nothings. Perhaps, as John Cassidy wrote in The New Yorker last year, that’s what Trump represents.

The history of nativism, Chomsky goes on, “continues into the 20th century. There’s a myth of Anglo-Saxonism. We’re pure Anglo-Saxons. (If you look around, it’s a joke.)” Now, there’s “the picture of us being overwhelmed by Muslims and Mexicans and the Chinese. Somehow, they’ve taken our country away.” This notion (which people like David Duke call “white genocide”) is based on something objective. The white population is pretty soon going to become a minority (whatever ‘white’ means)…. The response to this is generalized anger at everything. So every time Trump makes a nasty comment about whoever, his popularity goes up. Because it’s based on hate, you know. Hate and fear. And it’s unfortunately kind of reminiscent of something unpleasant: Germany, not many years ago.

Chomsky discusses Germany’s plummet from its cultural and political heights in the 20s—when Hitler received 3% of the vote—to the decay of the 30s, when the Nazis rose to power. Though the situations are “not identical,” they are similar enough, he says, to warrant concern. Likewise, the economic destruction of Greece, says Chomsky may (and indeed has) lead to the rise of a fascist party, a phenomenon we’ve witnessed all over Europe.

The fall of the Weimar Republic has a complicated history whose general outlines most of us know well enough. Germany’s defeat in WWI and the punitive, post-Treaty of Versailles’ reparations that contributed to hyperinflation and total economic collapse do not parallel the current state of affairs in the U.S.—anxious and agitated as the country may be. But Hitler’s rise to power is instructive. Initially dismissed as a clown, he struggled for political power for many years, and his party barely managed to hold a majority in the Reichstag in the early 30s. The historical question of why few—in Germany or in the U.S.—took Hitler seriously as a threat has become a commonplace. (Partly answered by the amount of tacit support both there and here.)

Hitler’s struggle for dominance truly catalyzed when he allied with the country’s conservatives (and Christians), who made him Chancellor. Thus began his program of Gleichschaltung“synchronization” or “bringing into line”—during which all former opposition was made to fully endorse his plans. In similar fashion, Trump has fought for political relevance on the right for years, using xenophobic bigotry as his primary weapon. It worked. Now that he has taken over the Republican Party—and the religious right—. . . .

https://www.openculture.com/2016/05/noam-chomsky-on-whether-the-rise-of-trump-resembles-the-rise-of-fascism-in-1930s-germany.html

 

TRUMP’S FIRST TERM BEGAN JAN. 20, 2017 AND ENDED Jan. 20, 2021.


2017

Roberto, Michael Joseph.  “The Origins of American Fascism.”  Monthly Review (June 2017).   Home  2017  Volume 69, Issue 02 (June 2017)    Cover photo from David Renton's Fascism: Theory and Practice.
What can a class analysis tell us about fascism’s national particularities and early forms? Why was there no mass movement for a separate fascist party in the United States? The lessons of several now-forgotten works of scholarship from the 1930s are critical to our understanding of American fascism—not only for what they tell us about its history, but also about how to fight it today.… | 
more…   
  https://monthlyreview.org/2017/06/01/the-origins-of-american-fascism/

 

Two Essays by John Bellamy Foster

“Neofascism in the White House.”  Monthly Review 68, no. 11 (April 2017).

“This Is Not Populism.”  Monthly Review 69 no. 2 (June 2017).

The Process of Encroaching Fascism

“Neofascism in the White House” by John Bellamy Foster.   https://monthlyreview.org/2017/04/01/neofascism-in-the-white-house/

There is a shadow of something colossal and menacing that even now is beginning to fall across the land. Call it the shadow of an oligarchy, if you will; it is the nearest I dare approximate it. What its nature may be I refuse to imagine. But what I wanted to say was this: You are in a perilous position.   Jack London, The Iron Heel (1907).

Not only a new administration, but a new ideology has now taken up residence at the White House: neofascism. It resembles in certain ways the classical fascism of Italy and Germany in the 1920s and ’30s, but with historically distinct features specific to the political economy and culture of the United States in the opening decades of the twenty-first century. This neofascism characterizes, in my assessment, the president and his closest advisers, and some of the key figures in his cabinet.2 From a broader sociological perspective, it reflects the electoral bases, class constituencies and alignments, and racist, xenophobic nationalism that brought Donald Trump into office. Neofascist discourse and political practice are now evident every day in virulent attacks on the racially oppressed, immigrants, women, LBGTQ people, environmentalists, and workers. These have been accompanied by a sustained campaign to bring the judiciary, governmental employees, the military and intelligence agencies, and the press into line with this new ideology and political reality. (Continued: https://monthlyreview.org/2017/04/01/neofascism-in-the-white-house/)

 

Explaining Hitler author breaks silence: Trump uses ‘Mein Kampf playbook’ to normalize tyranny” by DAVID EDWARDS  08 FEB 2017.                
 Historian Ron Rosenbaum spoke out this week about how President Donald Trump is using Adolf Hitler’s “playbook” from Mein Kampf for undermining democracy.

In a recent column for Los Angeles Review of Books, the author of Explaining Hitler breaks his silence about the recent U.S. election, and about how the “normalization” of Trump is strikingly similar to the Nazi Party’s march to power.

“What I want to suggest is an actual comparison with Hitler that deserves thought,” he writes. “It’s what you might call the secret technique, a kind of rhetorical control that both Hitler and Trump used on their opponents, especially the media.”

According to Rosenbaum, Trump is using the Mein Kampf  “playbook” to throw the media off balance and to normalize actions and statements that would have been unthinkable just months ago.

“It looked like the right-wing parties had been savvy in bringing [Hitler] in and ‘normalizing’ him, making him a figurehead for their own advancement,” Rosenbaum notes. “Instead, it was truly the stupidest move made in world politics within the memory of mankind. It took only a few months for the hopes of normalization to be crushed.”

 “Hitler’s methodwas to lie until he got what he wanted, by which point it was too late,” the column continues. “There is, of course, no comparison with Trump in terms of scale. His biggest policy decisions so far have been to name reprehensible figures to various cabinet posts and to enact dreadful executive orders. But this, too, is a form of destruction. While marchers and the courts have put up a fight after the Muslim ban, each new act, each new lie, accepted by default, seems less outrageous. Let’s call it what it is: defining mendacity down.”

Rosenbaum suggests that the signs were there before Trump took office: “The way Trump’s outrageous conduct and shamelessly lying mouth seemed so ridiculous we wouldn’t have to take him seriously. Until we did.”

We had heard allegations that Trump kept Hitler’s speeches by his bedside, but somehow we normalized that. We didn’t take him seriously because of all the outrageous, clownish acts and gaffes we thought would cause him to drop out of the race. Except these gaffes were designed to distract. This was his secret strategy, the essence of his success — you can’t take a stand against Trump because you don’t know where Trump is standing. You can’t find him guilty of evil, you can’t find him at all. And the tactics worked. Trump was not taken seriously, which allowed him to slip by the normal standards for an American candidate. The mountebank won. Again.

Suddenly, after the inconceivable (and, we are now beginning to realize, suspicious) Trump victory, the nation was forced to contend with what it would mean, whether the “alt-right” was a true threat or a joke to be tolerated. Did it matter that Trump had opened up a sewer pipe of racial hatred? Once again, normalization was the buzzword. . . .


Trump’s Authoritarian Methods

“Trump draws from authoritarian playbook” By John Diaz.  The San Francisco Chronicle.  March 10, 2017,  Updated: March 11, 2017

As a candidate and now as president, Donald Trump has displayed an authoritarian streak unrivaled in American history. His dystopian description of the state of the nation and his declaration that “I, alone, can fix it” at the Republican convention in July evoked the fearmongering and narcissism of many strongmen before him. The “lock her up” chants he savored and stoked at campaign rallies raised unsettling reminders of regimes where jailing a vanquished opponent is step one in a transition of power.

Any hope that the assumption of the presidency would somehow temper Trump, and heighten his appreciation of its covenant with our democracy, vanished soon after his taking the oath of office.   His most insidious tirade to date — and there is no shortage of contenders for that distinction — was his March 4 series of early morning tweets that accused his predecessor, Barack Obama, of ordering the wiretapping of Trump Tower while Trump was a candidate. The seriousness of this allegation cannot be overstated. . . .

This episode cannot be separated from the larger context of Trump’s continuing attacks that undermine public confidence in the pillars of our democracy. He has challenged the notion that this nation has fair elections (warning beforehand that they would be rigged for Hillary Clinton, then complaining afterward that illegal voting gave her the popular vote), an impartial judiciary (once questioning whether an American-born judge of Mexican descent could fairly hear the lawsuit against Trump University, then disparaging a Republican-appointed judge who rejected his administration’s travel ban from seven Muslim-majority nations), an independent media (trashing respected organizations as “fake news,” belittling protesters of his inauguration and disparaging the U.S. intelligence apparatus (and then suggesting the media cooked up the controversy he clearly initiated).

Trump’s serial untruths, sowing fear and confusion, and attempts to delegitimize critical oversight — whether from the judiciary or the media — are right out of an autocrat’s starter kit. Trump is hardly the first leader to attach the words “enemy of the people” to real or perceived adversaries (Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin invoked the phrase) or refer to the press as “the opposition” (Argentina’s Néstor Kirchner and Uruguay’s Tabaré Ramón Vázquez beat the White House to the punch on that one).

Trump’s allies are quick to excuse his provably false declarations and caustic disparagement of those who are dedicated to exposing or restraining executive overreach as “Donald being Donald,” the new norm of an unorthodox presidency. But this recklessness comes at a cost. No democracy is invincible; self-governance depends on the citizenry’s faith in the probity of the systems that support it.

“Donald Trump’s whole narrative has been to foster distrust of government institutions,” said Jessica Levinson, a Loyola Law School professor who specializes in election law and governance issues. His message, she said, is “you can’t trust anyone but him.” . . . .  
John Diaz is The San Francisco Chronicle’s editorial page editor. Email: 
jdiaz@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @JohnDiazChron

Know US History to Answer the Question 
Trump is Not Hitler: How the Misuse of History Distorts the Present as Well as the Pastby RON LEIGHTON.  Counterpunch (1-18-2017)

http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/01/18/trump-is-not-hitler-how-the-misuse-of-history-distorts-the-present-as-well-as-the-past/

This essay tosses and tumbles a dozen or more reasons why Trump is not a new Hitler.   And we should remember the author is assessing Trump’s first administration.
“If we want to pay attention to history, rather than merely virtue-signal that we are, why not give some attention first to the history of the United States, particularly the history, say, of the last fifty years when neoliberalism went from swear word to  virtual watchword (if not explicitly)? This period tells us more about Trump and his rise than do grainy images of goose-stepping Nazis. As my historian friend, Evangelos points out, assuming for the moment Trump’s personality matches Hitler’s, “It’s more important that the U.S. in 2016 is not at all like Germany in 1932, than whether or not a particular personality type has come to power.” That is what it looks like to understand the past and the present.”
As an example he cites Obama:  “Arguably, US leaders that are decidedly not considered new Hitlers have and are carrying out or implementing actual, substantively fascist-like actions and policies. For instance, the Obama Administration has repeatedly reaffirmed a law allowing for the 
“indefinite detention [of Americans] without charge or trial.” How might Trump use that? Additionally, the Obama Administration, when Clinton was Secretary of State, leveraged fake news about imminent massacres by the Libyan government to destroy the country, overthrow its leader, and leave it at the mercy of rightwing terrorists. Nazis were hanged for doing similar things. In general, in fact, Obama helped to expand the power of the executive in war making through actions related to Libya and Syria at the expense Congress’s prerogative and responsibility. Obama has now bequeathed this arguably Hitlerian power to Trump, too.”    -Dick         

 

2018

Benjamin Carter Hett, Interview and Review

Robin Lindley Interviews Benjamin C. Hett

Jim O'Brien via H-PAD <h-pad@lists.historiansforpeace.org>      Nov 12, 2018.   "The Sudden Death of a Democracy: Historian Benjamin Carter Hett on the Fall of the Weimar Republic."     Interview conducted by Robin Lindley, History News Network, posted November 2.

Benjamin Carter Hett teaches history at Hunter College and the CUNY Graduate Center and is the author of a new book on Hitler's rise to power, 1930-33, The Death of Democracy.

 

“How Did the Nazis Gain Power in Germany?”  A Review by Timothy Snyder.  NY Times Book Review.  2018.
THE DEATH OF DEMOCRACY: Hitler’s Rise to Power and the Downfall of the Weimar Republic By Benjamin Carter Hett.  Henry Holt, 2018.   280pp.

We ask about the rise of the Nazis from what we think is a great distance. We take for granted that the Germans of the 1930s were quite different from ourselves, and that our consideration of their errors will only confirm our superiority. The opposite is the case. Although Benjamin Carter Hett makes no comparisons between Germany then and the United States now in “The Death of Democracy,” his extremely fine study of the end of constitutional rule in Germany, he dissolves those comforting assumptions. He is not discussing a war in which Germans were enemies or describing atrocities that we are sure we could never commit. He presents Hitler’s rise as an element of the collapse of a republic confronting dilemmas of globalization with imperfect instruments and flawed leaders. With careful prose and fine scholarship, with fine thumbnail sketches of individuals and concise discussions of institutions and economics, he brings these events close to us.

The Nazis, in Hett’s account, were above all “a nationalist protest movement against globalization.” Even before the Great Depression brought huge unemployment to Germany, the caprice of the global economy offered an opportunity to politicians who had simple answers. In their 1920 program, the Nazis proclaimed that “members of foreign nations (noncitizens) are to be expelled from Germany.” Next would come autarky: Germans would conquer the territory they needed to be self-sufficient, and then create their own economy in isolation from that of the rest of the world. As Goebbels put it, “We want to build a wall, a protective wall.” Hitler maintained that the vicissitudes of globalization were not the result of economic forces but of a Jewish international conspiracy.

Hett, a professor of history at Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, sensitively describes a moral crisis that preceded a moral catastrophe. If Jews were held responsible for what happened in Germany, then Germans were victims and their actions always defensive. Political irresponsibility flowed from the unfortunate example of President Paul von Hindenburg. He was famous as the victor in a battle on the Eastern Front of World War I, even though the credit was not fully deserved. Hindenburg could not face the reality of defeat on the Western Front in 1918, and so spread the lie that the German Army had been “stabbed in the back” by Jews and Socialists. This moral weakness of one man radiated outward. Once Hindenburg won the presidential elections of 1925, Germany was trapped by his oversensitivity about a reputation that would not withstand scrutiny. He believed that only he could save Germany, but would not put himself forward to do so, for fear of damaging his image. Without Hindenburg’s founding fiction and odd posturing, it is unlikely that Hitler would have come to power.

As Hett capably shows, the Nazis were the great artists of victimhood fiction. Hitler, who had served with German Jews in the war, spread the idea that Jews had been the enemy within, proposing that the German Army would have won had some of them been gassed to death. Goebbels had Nazi storm troopers attack leftists precisely so that he could claim that the Nazis were victims of Communist violence. Hitler believed in telling lies so big that their very scale left some residue of credibility. The Nazi program foresaw that newspapers would serve the “general good” rather than reporting, and promised “legal warfare” against opponents who spread information they did not like. They opposed what they called “the system” by rejecting its basis in the factual world. Germans were not rational individuals with interests, the reasoning went, but members of a tribe that wanted to follow a leader (Führer).

Much of this was familiar from Italian Fascism, but Hitler’s attempt to imitate Mussolini’s March on Rome failed. When Hitler tried a coup d’état in 1923, he and the Nazis were easily defeated and he was sentenced to prison, where he wrote “Mein Kampf.” In Hett’s account, the electoral rise of the Nazis in the late 1920s and early 1930s had less to do with his particular ideas and more to do with an opening on the political spectrum. The Nazis filled a void between the Catholic electorate of the Center Party and a working class that voted Socialist or Communist. Their core constituents, Hett indicates, were Protestants from the countryside or small towns who felt themselves to be the victims of globalization.

Did the Nazis come to power through democratic elections? In Germany in the 1930s, as elsewhere, elections continued even as their meaning changed. The fact that the Nazis used violence to intimidate others meant that elections were not free in the normal sense. And the system was rigged in their favor by men in power who had no use for democracy or for democrats. The Nazis were by no means the handmaidens of German industry or the German military but, as Hett argues, both businessmen and officers formed lobbies in the late 1920s that aimed to break the republic and its bastion, the Social Democrats. They tended to confuse their particular interests in lower wages and higher military spending with those of the German nation as a whole. This made it easy to see the Social Democrats as foreign and hostile.

In a similarly titled book, “How Democracies Die,” the political scientists Daniel Ziblatt and Steven Levitsky have recently argued that the killers of democracy begin by using the law against itself. Constitutions break when ill-motivated leaders deliberately expose their vulnerabilities. Certainly this was the case in Germany in 1930.President Hindenburg was technically within his rights to dissolve the Reichstag, name a new chancellor and rule by decree. By turning what was meant to be an exceptional situation into the rule, however, he transformed the German government into a feuding clique disconnected from society. Governments dependent upon the president had no reason to think creatively about policy, despite the Great Depression. Voters flowed to both extremes, to the Communists and even more to the Nazis. The Nazis took advantage of an opportunity created by people who could destroy a republic while lacking the imagination to see what comes next.

When elections were called in 1932, the purpose was not to confirm democracy but to bring down the republic. Hindenburg and his advisers saw the Nazis as a group capable of creating a majority for the right. The elections were a “solution” to a fake crisis that had been, as Hett puts it, “manufactured by a political right wing that wanted to exclude more than half the population from political representation and refused even the mildest compromise.” It did not occur to the president’s camp that the Nazis would do as well as they did, or that their leader would escape their control. And so the feckless schemes of the conservatives realized the violent dreams of the Nazis. The Nazis won 37 percent of the vote in July, 33 percent in a November election, and Hitler became chancellor in January 1933. A few weeks later, he used the pretext of the arson of the Reichstag to pass an enabling act that in effect replaced the constitution.

Hindenburg died in 1934 believing that he had saved Germany and his own reputation. In fact, he had created the conditions for the great horror of modern times. Hett’s book is implicitly addressed to conservatives. Rather than asking how the left could have acted to stop Hitler, he closes his book by considering the German conservatives who aided Hitler’s rise, then changed their minds and plotted against him. Following the recent work of Rainer Orth, Hett says that the Night of the Long Knives, the blood purge of June 1934, was directed mainly against these right-wing opponents.

The conclusions for conservatives of today emerge clearly: Do not break the rules that hold a republic together, because one day you will need order. And do not destroy the opponents who respect those rules, because one day you will miss them.  
Timothy Snyder is the Levin professor of history at Yale University. His latest book is The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America.

Forwarded to me by Bob Billig 6-17-18

 


It Can Happen Here: German History and Trump's Enablers by Heather Gray.   Justice Initiative.  October 6, 2018.   https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif

Note: As one who is a student of history, and of the Nazi era in Europe, I can't help but see parallel's with what we are now witnessing in the United States as referred to by Professor Richard Frankel in the article below. I have also noted that Trump and those around him are using tactics similar to  Hitler. Hitler violently and through propaganda negated Jews and others considered non-German. Trump is  also "targeting the other" and/or "blaming the other" as a rallying strategy such against  immigrants, Muslims, children, and more recently, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, to give but a few examples. 

 

As is also noted repeatedly during the Nazi era, those in the United States and in other parts of Europe did not take the early Nazi actions seriously. Nor did they take time to both understand and analyze the dynamics of it all. As Dr. Frankel notes, we do so at our peril as at the end of this article, he notes:   No one can know what's just beyond the horizon. But what we do know is that once that window of opportunity closes, it's too late. That's why the time to speak, the time to resist, is now. We've already had more time than the Germans did in 1933. Let's not squander what remains in the misplaced hope that it can't happen here. 

 

“German History and Trump's Enablers.”   

One of the most important lessons that German history has to offer is less about Hitler than about those around him, many of whom were not even Nazis. The enablers also bear responsibility.  Richard E. Frankel.  HISTORY NEWS NETWORK.  Portside   October 5, 2018. 

 

Over the next few days, millions of Americans will be anxiously watching and waiting to see whether a few undecided Republican Senators will vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh as our next Supreme Court Justice. Their vote will help shape the Court for a generation. More importantly, their vote holds the potential to help Donald Trump further transform this country into an authoritarian, exclusionary democracy. 

 

As I watch all this unfold, I'm reminded of one of the most important lessons that German history has to offer us.   And interestingly enough, this lesson is much less about Hitler himself than about those around him, many of whom were not even Nazis.

 

Adolf Hitler did not seize power in a coup. There were no violent clashes between Storm Troopers and government forces, no storming of government buildings. He did not take the Chancellorship. It was given to him. On January 30, 1933, the German President and hero of the First World War, Paul von Hindenburg, appointed Hitler Chancellor in a Cabinet with just two other Nazis. The rest were nationalists of various kinds, but not National Socialists. 

 

Why is this important for us to understand today, in Donald Trump's America? Because, among other things, it teaches us that the would-be autocrat cannot succeed alone. He needs help, and not just at the point of coming to power. Hitler--originally the most improbable candidate to lead a country like Germany--became possible because much of the ground had already been prepared by others, many of whom were not friends of Adolf Hitler.

 

People attacked the democratic republic from the very beginning, before it even had a chance to prove what it could do. . . .

 

Fortunately for him, there were people willing to provide assistance. There were those like Ernst "Putzi" von Hanfstaengel, who helped make the "Bohemian corporal" socially acceptable in elite circles. There were those like the radical nationalist media mogul Alfred Hugenberg, who legitimized Hitler by including him in a major nationalist campaign.

 

There were those who wore down Hindenburg's resistance and convinced him to appoint Hitler. And there were those in parliament-all but the Social Democrats-who voted for the Enabling Act in March 1933 that gave him dictatorial powers.

 

What we see in America, unfortunately, is something rather similar. As was the case in Germany, there've been all too many people ready and willing to provide the necessary assistance to make Donald Trump-not long ago one of the most improbable candidates to lead a country like America-President of the United States.

 

There were those who helped make Trump's job of destroying liberal democracy that much easier before he'd even entered the political arena. Following Senate leader Mitch McConnell's determination to make Barack Obama a one-term president, congressional Republicanscommitted themselves to pure and unadulterated opposition, working to block every single initiative he put forward. This involved the use of the filibuster with unprecedented frequency and the blocking of judicial appointments up to and including the theft of a Supreme Court nomination that was rightfully Obama's to make.

 

That level of obstruction-to the point where government looks increasingly ineffective, unable to deliver on its promises-helps break down people's faith in institutions, makes people willing to consider alternatives, including perhaps a strong leader who can break through the impediments, who can get things moving again even if it's at the expense of democracy.

 

Then there was the undermining of the opposition party and in particular, its leader, Barack Obama. There was the extreme rhetoric used to attack him, including of course, the whole Birther movement-cultivated within the Republican Party-that claimed America's first black President was not born in the United States and was therefore an illegitimate ruler. . . .

 

Unfortunately there's more than just the rhetoric and actions that have made Trump's presidency a real possibility. There's the astonishing lack of any serious criticism of him by members of his own party. . . . .

 

Of course it's true, no one knew just how little time they would have. No one knew if Hitler would be Chancellor for long. No one knew that the Reichstag would burn. No one knew all the horrors that were still to come. Nobody could know. But that's precisely the point. No one can know what's just beyond the horizon. But what we do know is that once that window of opportunity closes, it's too late. That's why the time to speak, the time to resist, is now. We've already had more time than the Germans did in 1933. Let's not squander what remains in the misplaced hope that it can't happen here. 

 Richard E. Frankel is an Associate Professor of history at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.

 

Juan Cole.  “Warning to US: Erdogan Has Used Same Techniques as Trump to De-Democratize Turkey.”  
Informed Comment .  Reader Supported News(26 June 18). 

 

Cole writes: "Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the president of Turkey, began his legitimate political career at the turn of this century with a push for more political pluralism in a Turkey that had long been dominated by an elite, secular military."   READ MORE  [Access is forbidden.  –D]

 

“Reich on Trump.”[A Second Civil War?  Trump With? Or Against the “Deep State”?  Depends on how you define it.] 
(I think this was published in 2018.  Google Reich on Trump, where another statement with the same title appears in Feb. 21, 2025.  Reich’s been studying Trump for a decade or more.  --D)

Imagine that an impeachment resolution against Donald Trump passes the House. Trump claims it’s the work of the “deep state.” Sean Hannity of Fox News demands that every honest patriot take to the streets. Right-wing social media call for war. As insurrection spreads, Trump commands the armed forces to side with the “patriots.”  Or, it’s November 2020 and Trump has lost the election. He charges voter fraud, claiming that the “deep state” organized tens of millions of illegal immigrants to vote against him, and says he has an obligation not to step down. Demonstrations and riots ensue. Trump commands the armed forces to put them down.  If these sound far-fetched, consider Trump’s torrent of lies, his admiration for foreign dictators, his offhand jokes about being “president for life,” and his increasing invocation of a “deep state” plot against him.

The United States is premised on an agreement about how to deal with our disagreements. It’s called the Constitution. We trust our system of government enough that we abide by its outcomes even though we may disagree with them. Only once in our history — in 1861 — did enough of us distrust the system so much we succumbed to civil war.
[Trump embraces the billionaires and bankers and creates a “deep state” of enemy scapegoats of everyone who opposes him.  –D]
But what happens if a president claims our system is no longer trustworthy?
Last month, Trump accused the “deep state” of embedding a spy in his campaign for political purposes. “Spygate” soon unraveled after Republican House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy dismissed it, but truth has never silenced Trump for long. Trump’s immediate goal is to discredit Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation. But his strategy appears to go beyond that. In tweets and on Fox News, Trump’s overall mission is repeatedly described as a “war on the deep state.”  In his 2013 novel “A Delicate Truth,” John le Carre describes the “deep state” as a moneyed elite— “nongovernmental insiders from banking, industry and commerce” who rule in secret.  America already may be close to that sort of deep state. As Princeton Professor Martin Gilens and Northwestern Professor Benjamin Page found after analyzing 1,799 policy issues that came before Congress, “the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.”   Instead,
Gilens and Page concluded, lawmakers respond to the policy demands of wealthy individuals and moneyed business interests.   The data Gilens and Page used come from the period from 1981 to 2002, before the Supreme Court opened the floodgates to big money in its Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission decision. It’s likely to be far worse now.

So when Trump says the political system is “rigged,” he’s not far off the mark. Bernie Sanders said the same thing.   A Monmouth University poll released in March found that a bipartisan majority of Americans already believes that an unelected “deep state” is manipulating national policy.   

But here’s the crucial distinction.  [To]Trump [the] “deep state” isn’t the moneyed interests. It’s a supposed cabal of government workers, intelligence personnel, researchers, experts, scientists, professors and journalists — the people who make, advise about, analyze or report on public policy.   In the real world, they’re supposed to be truth-tellers. In Trump’s conspiracy fantasy, they’re out to get him. . . .

A second civil war? Probably not. But the way Trump and his defenders are behaving, it’s not absurd to imagine serious social unrest. That’s how low he’s taken us.   © 2018 Robert Reich, a former Secretary of Labor, is a professor of public policy at UC Berkeley. To comment, submit your letter to the editor at SFChronicle.com/letters.

Trump:  More  Military and Armaments

D-G Staff.   “Trump’s Budget Sustains Deficit.  $4.4 Trillion Plan Boosts Spending.” NADG (Feb. 13, 2018), 1A.  ‘’We’re going to have the strongest military we’ve ever had, by far,’ Trump said. ‘In this budget we took care of the military like it’s never been taken care of before.’  It would continue to markedly increase military spending and set aside money for a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.” 

 

2019
Christian Fuchs.  Henry A. Giroux and the Culture of Neoliberal Fascism.”mronline.org (8-25-19).

HENRY A. GIROUX’s book The Terror of the Unforeseen analyzes the conditions that have enabled and led to Donald Trump’s rule and the consequences of that rule, that have ushered in an authoritarian version of capitalism. Giroux provides a realistic analysis that holds out the hope that, through collective efforts, change is possible and democracy […]   Source
Christian Fuchs
 (Posted Aug 24, 2019)

Originally published: Los Angeles Review of Books  on August 12, 2019 (more by Los Angeles Review of Books).     Fascism, ImperialismGlobalReview.

 

 

2020

 

Fascism:  History and Theory by David Renton.  Pluto P, 2020.

The classic text on the history and theory of fascism, revised for the twentieth anniversary of its first publication

Across Europe and the world, far right parties have been enjoying greater electoral success than at any time since 1945. Right-wing street movements draw huge supporters and terrorist attacks on Jews and Muslims proliferate. It sometimes seems we are returning to the age of fascism.

To explain this disturbing trend, David Renton surveys the history of fascism in Europe from its pre-war origins to the present day, examining Marxist responses to fascism in the age of Hitler and Mussolini, the writings of Trotsky and Gramsci and contemporary theorists. Renton theorises that fascism was driven by the chaotic and unstable balance between reactionary ambitions and the mass character of its support. This approach will arm a new generation of anti-fascists to resist those who seek to re-enact fascism.

Rewritten and revised for the twentieth anniversary of its first publication, Renton's classic book synthesises the Marxist theory of fascism and updates it for our own times.

TRUMP’S FIRST TERM BEGAN JAN. 20, 2017 AND ENDED Jan. 20, 2021.

TRUMP’S 2ND TERM BEGAN JANUARY 20, 2025.

2025

 

 

 

A blue and white logo

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Surrendering to Authoritarianism.  The Chris Hedges Report (3-24-25).

Liberal institutions, including universities, traditionally surrender without a fight to the dictates of autocrats. Ours are no exception.

Chris Hedges.  , March,  24, 2025.

 

A person holding his glasses

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

 

 

I was not surprised when Columbia University’s interim president Katrina Armstrong caved to the demands of the Trump administration. She agreed to ban face masks or face coverings, prohibit protests in academic buildings and create an internal security force of 36 New York City Police officers empowered to “remove individuals from campus and/or arrest them when appropriate.” She has also surrendered the autonomy of academic departments, as demanded by the Trump administration, by appointing a new senior vice provost to “review” the university’s department of Middle East, South Asian and African Studies and the Center for Palestine Studies.

Elite universities such as Harvard, Princeton, Columbia or Yale, were created to train and perpetuate the plutocracy. They are not and never have been centers of cutting-edge intellectual thought or hospitable to dissidents and radicals. They cloak themselves in the veneer of moral probity and intellectualism but cravenly serve political and economic power. This is their nature. Don’t expect it to change, even as we fall headlong into authoritarianism.

Armstrong, like most of the heads of our universities, is fruitlessly humiliating herself. She would, I expect, happily make space on her office wall to hang an oversized portrait of the president. But what she does not know, and what history has taught us, is that no appeasement is sufficient with autocrats. She, and the rest of the liberal elites, groveling abjectly in an attempt to accommodate their new masters, will be steadily replaced or dominated by buffoonish goons such as those seeded throughout the Trump administration.

The Department of Education has warned 60 colleges and universities that they could face “potential enforcement actions,” if they do not comply with federal civil rights law that protects students from discrimination based on race or nationality, which includes antisemitism. Columbia, stripped of $400 million in federal grants, is desperately trying to restore the funding. I doubt it will work. Those mounting these assaults against universities intend to turn them into indoctrination machines. The so-called campaign against antisemitism is simply a cynical tool being used to achieve that end.

The warning follows an open letter signed by 200 faculty members on Feb. 3 urging Columbia University implement measures to “protect Jewish students.” Amongst their demands are the removal of Professor Joseph Massad who teaches Modern Arab Politics and Intellectual History at the university and beginning a Title VI investigation against him, that the university adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, which conflates criticism of Israel with racism against Jews, and the university hire tenured pro-Israel faculty. . . .

Universities and colleges across the country have shut down free speech and squandered their academic integrity. They have brutalized, arrested, suspended and expelled faculty, administrators and students that decry the genocide. They have called police to their campuses — in the case of Columbia three times — to arrest students, often charging them with trespassing. Following the lead of their authoritarian masters they subjected students to internal surveillance. Columbia University, out front on the repression of its students, banned Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace a month after Israel’s genocide in Gaza had begun in November 2023, when both organizations called for a ceasefire, long before the protests and encampments began. . . .

And this is where we are. None of the liberal institutions, including the universities, the commercial media and the Democratic Party, will defend us. They will remain supine, hypocritically betray their supposed principles and commitment to democracy or willingly transform themselves into apologists for the regime. The purges and silencing of our most courageous and accomplished intellectuals, writers, artists and journalists — begun before Trump’s return to the White House — is being expedited.

Resistance will be left to us. Enemies of the state.

 

2025

Volker Ulrich.  Hitler: Ascent, 1889-1939. 

 HITLER’S SPEECH TO HIS ARMY COMMANDERS FEBRUARY 10, 1939:  German Hyper-Nationalism, Exceptionalism, Hitler’s Megalomania, Destiny/Predestination of Germany and Hitler.

     On this day Hitler spoke to his officer corps in Berlin about his easy triumphs over Austria and Czechoslovakia and about his plans for the future (his top military leaders were already aware).  The 85 million, “highly civilized race” of Germans “’were the strongest people not just in Europe but practically the entire world.’”  They “had a right to greater living space in order to preserve their standard of living,” a right and future that had been “preordained.”  And he was the individual predetermined to carry out that destiny.  This goal “’will dominate my entire existence,’” and he would “’never shrink back from the most extreme measures.’”  Soon afterward he “set about capturing what had escaped his clutches in the autumn of 1938,” the rest of Czechoslovakia.  Conquest of Poland and western Europe followed.     Volker Ullrich, Hitler: Ascent, 1889-1939 (p. 749).

   [  Successful conquests usually do not repeat the patterns of earlier invasions.  Imperialists know that leaders and populations on both sides must be surprised, one to be compliant to their leaders’ massive violence, the other to be unaware and overwhelmed by the new arrangement and symbols of violence.   The United States military at present has a new total budget of a trillion dollars, some 800 military bases in some 70 countries, and ten aircraft carrier groups with a new carrier doing sea trials.   And it all happened gradually, after having been jump-started by WWII.  The Reagan administration gave its full support to counterrevolutionary forces in Central America, and developed plans for martial law at home, giving sole power to the president and authority to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to round up dissidents, aliens, enemies, etc., and place them in detention centers.  One morning we all woke up and found ourselves living in a heavily militarized empire.    

      But Reagan was not Hitler; nor is Trump.    Hitler yearned for living space for his fellow exceptional Germans, and mobilized highly visible tanks and planes and marching troops to gain his predestined goal.  He needed to use none of it against Austria and Czechoslovakia so intimidating was such power.    Our presidents since WWII at first followed this model, until, responding to public uneasiness, they turned increasingly to less visible war— volunteer troops, world-best technology, drones, proxies, contractors.  But the cause is similar: dictatorship’s territorial domination for resources, today for fossil fuels especially, with confidence in the unique, exceptional nation under divine providence.  –Dick.]

 

 

CONTENTS of TRUMP AUTHORITARIANISM, AUTOCRACY, FASCISM, NAZISMANTHOLOGY #1(originally The Insurrection)
PBS Frontline, American Insurrection

NYT, “The Politics of Menace.”

NPR, Fresh Air, Trump’s Strategy, Next Time

Robert Costa and Bob Woodward, Peril

Alfred McCoy, To Govern the Globe and “An American Coup”

Karen Greenberg, Subtle Tools

Robert Kagan, “Our Constant Crisis Is Already Here”

Kate Woodsome, “How the Capitol Attack Unfolded,” Washington Post

Jeremy Kuzmarov, “Was the January 6th a Dress Rehearsal for a Coup d’État”?

Dick, Trump’s Ongoing Attempted Coup Increasingly Autocratic

Joshua Cho, US Media and Trump’s Coup Attempt

Gregory Krieg, CNN, “Trump’s Attempt to Steal the Election”

Ezra Klein, “Trump is Attempting a Coup in Plain Sight”

Two Books Recommended by George Paulson:

  Mazower, Hitler’s Empire

  Childers, The Third Reich

Painter and Golenbock, American Nero, rev. by Dahlia Lithwick

Dick, Benjamin Hett’s The Death of Democracy

https://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2022/01/omni-insurrection-anthology-january-2.html