OMNI
United Nations Conference of Parties 27 (COP27)
December 4, 2022
Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace, Justice, and Ecology
https://Omnicenter.org/donate/
2022 United Nations Climate Change Conferences
27th Conference of the Parties (COP27)
CONTENTS UN COP 27
Original Announcement:
COP 27 – UN Foundation Climate Change Conference #27.
UN Foundation. “Climate Justice, COP, and an 8 billion milestone.”
OMNI Center. Achievement, US Role.
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Loss and Damage Fund Achieved, but
not stopping warming.
Vijay Prashad. Loss and Damage Fund achieved, little else.
George Monbiot. A bleak assessment. The Governments chose to do nothing that could change our catastrophic trajectory.
Bill McKibben in The New Yorker. Theconference was largely a search for
cash.
COP27: Corporate courts versus developing world.
Fiona Harvey. “World Still ‘On Brink of Climate Catastrophe’ “
Veterans for Peace v. US Militarism/Fossil Fuels Status Quo.
TEXTS
Original Announcement
COP 27 – UNFoundation Climate Change Conference #27. https://unfccc.int › event › cop-27 In November 2022, the Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt will host the 27th Conference of the Parties (COP27) of the UNFCCC (COP 27), with a view to build...
COP27 – Home https://cop27.eg The meeting comprises UNFCCC COP 27, The Kyoto Protocol CMP 17, and the Paris Agreement CMA 4, together with SB57. Provisional Agenda. Presidency Action Agenda.
People also ask:
What is COP27 stand for?
Where is COP27?
What is COP27 and why is it important?
Why is it called COP27?
“Catch up: Climate Justice, COP, and an 8 billion milestone.”
| ) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
“Was COP27 A Failure? In Sharm Al Sheik Egypt.” OMNI Center (11-30-22). https://mailchi.mp/coveringclimatenow/what-were-reading-about-cop27-outcomes?e=7da2920078
A short run-down of the results of COP 27. It was not a raging success, but a few positive things came from it.
A note on the role the US plays in these meetings... the primary goal of many protesters was a fund for loss and damage. That was accomplished when Biden withdrew resistance to the fund. It's never China. What a ruse.
Covering Climate Now on COP 27...
|
“In Malay, orangutans means ‘people of the forest’, but those forests are disappearing: The Forty-Seventh Newsletter (2022).” Vijay Prashad. Mronline.org (11-27-22).
The dust has settled at the resorts in Sharm el-Shaikh, Egypt, as delegates of countries and corporations leave the 27th Conference of the Parties (COP) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The only advance made in the final agreement was for the creation of a ‘loss and damage fund’ for ‘vulnerable countries’.
GEORGE MONBIOT. “How About Never?” Posted on23rd November 2022. Orig. published in the Guardian 18th November 2022.
[If way to the Better there be,/It exacts a full look at the Worst. Thomas Hardy --Dick]
Share27
Powerful governments have no intention of preventing climate breakdown.
The chances of any one person being born were calculated by the life coach Dr Ali Binazir. He multiplied the probability of your parents meeting, mating and conceiving by the chances of a particular sperm and egg fusing; of all your human and hominid ancestors reaching reproductive age; and of all them successfully reproducing. He arrived at a figure of one in 10 to the power of 2,640,000. In other words, a 10 followed by 2.6m zeros. It’s an unimaginable, miraculous number. Yet here we are.
The chances of being alive right now, as a member of one of the first generations to know the path it is on, and one of the last that can change it, must add several more zeros to this crazy number. The chances of being the president or prime minister of your nation at this critical moment … well you get the idea.
So how have heads of government chosen to use this miracle? To extend our time on Earth, earning the gratitude of all the improbable humans of the future? No. They have chosen to do nothing. Nothing that has a realistic chance, in this contest of probabilities, of changing our trajectory. They had a choice at the Cop27 meeting in Sharm el-Sheikh of defending the habitable planet or appeasing their sponsors. They went with the sponsors.
We know how way leads on to way, how the power amassed through corrupt decisions in previous generations drives the corrupt decisions of our time. We know that the licence granted to fossil fuel companies by 50 years of failure has enabled them to make stupendous profits – $2.8bn a day on average across that entire period – and that they need invest only a fraction of this money in politics to buy every politician and every political decision they want.
We know that the easiest way for a politician to secure power is to appease those who already possess it, those whose power transcends elections: the oil barons, the media barons, the corporations and financial markets. We know that this power appoints the worst possible people at the worst possible time. We know how, as elderly billionaires seek to grab ever more of the life that slips from them, they create a death cult.
Fifty years, you ask? Yes, the first international summit that claimed to address the environmental crisis took place in 1972. A handful of powerful nations, including the UK and US, convened what their secret minutes called an “informal and confidential” body at that summit, whose purpose, the notes show, was to ensure poorer countries did not get what they wanted, and that no international standards would be agreed on pollution or environmental quality.
They learned an important lesson there. You make the threats to your sponsors go away by nodding and smiling, saying the right things in public, then blocking effective measures behind closed doors. When they arrived at Cop27 this year, they had no intention even of paying the money they had promised to poorer nations to help them adapt – if such a thing is possible – to climate breakdown, let alone seeking to prevent that breakdown from happening.
So here we are, after 50 years of engineered failure, with not one of the 40 markers of climate action on track to meet the targets governments have agreed. In the first nine months of this year, the seven biggest private sector oil companies made around $150bn in profits. Yet governments continue to supplement this loot by granting oil and gas companies $64bn a year in public subsidies.
There are no longer any feasible means of preventing more than 1.5C of global heating if new oil and gas fields are developed. Yet fossil-fuel companies, with the encouragement of the governments that either own or license them, are planning a major investment surge between 2023 and 2025. The biggest planned expansions, by a long way, are in the US. The soft facts – the vague and unsecured promises at Sharm el-Sheikh about curbing consumption – count for nothing against the hard facts of extending production.
We no longer need to speculate about where this path might lead: we have stepped through the gates. The floods in Pakistan that displaced 33 million people and washed away 3 million acres of soil followed a crop-shrivelling heatwave. This is the whipsaw effect predicted in scientific papers: of moderate weather giving way to a violent cycle of extremes. It’s hard to see how the country will ever recover from the economic shocks of these disasters: as it starts to pick itself up, it’s likely to be knocked down by another one. China this year, though this was sparsely reported in the western media, suffered not only the greatest heatwave in its instrumental record, but the greatest heat anomaly ever recorded anywhere. The devastating drought in the Horn of Africa, now in its fifth year, offers a glimpse of what “uninhabitable” may look like.
The rich world’s governments arrived at the conference in Egypt saying “it’s now or never”. They left saying “how about never?”. We sail through every target and objective, red line and promised restraint towards a future in which the possibility of anyone’s existence starts to dwindle towards zero. Every life is a madly improbable gift. For how much longer will we sit and watch while our governments throw it all away?
www.monbiot.com, https://www.monbiot.com/2022/11/23/how-about-never/
POSTED IN CLIMATE BREAKDOWN
“I love not man the less, but Nature more.”
Bill McKibben. “How To Pay for Climate Justice When Polluters Have All the Money.” The New Yorker (November 19, 2022).
The COP27 climate conference, in Egypt, was in large part a global search for cash.
“COP27: Corporate courts versus developing world.”
Editor. Mronline.org (11-21-22).
As rich countries move away from dispute-settlement mechanisms that give corporations power to block environmental protections, Manuel Pérez-Rocha says they keep imposing them on developing countries through trade pacts.
Fiona Harvey. World Still ‘On Brink of Climate Catastrophe’ After Cop27 Deal. The Guardian (November 20, 2022).
Experts say biggest economies must pledge more cuts to carbon emissions but hail agreement to set up loss and damage fund.
SARAH KAPLAN, TIMOTHY PUKO AND EVAN HALPER. “Climate summit’s results mixed.” Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Nov 21, 2022). Climate summit’s results mixed Progress made on current problems, but not prevention. Read more... (Sent to me by Pat Snyder.)
Veterans for Peace v. US Fossil Fuels Status Quo
|
|
|
|
END COP 27