Quantcast
Channel: OMNI's War and Warming Anthologies
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 902

OMNI CRITICAL THINKING NEWSLETTER #4

$
0
0

OMNI

CRITICAL THINKING, SKEPTICISM NEWSLETTER #4, December 31, 2017.Compiled by Dick Bennett for a Culture of Peace.

   (#1 July 5, 2011; #2 October 18, 2012; #3 March 16, 2013).

http://omnicenter.org/donate/

What’s at stake:   Several years ago on the same day I read the latest no. of Skeptical Inquirer and began reading the 2nd ed. of David Swanson's War Is a Lie, I was struck yet again by the similarities in the lies and myths that create fundamentalist religious belief and belief in the paranormal, and the lies and myths that cause and sustain wars.   Resistance to both is also similar: particularly strong education in questioning assumptions and claims and in the use of evidence.  Now myths and lies motivate or are exploited by deniers of anthropogenic global warming, and the cure again includes critical thinking, of which science is the foundation.

Nos. 1-3  at end


Here is the link to all the newsletters in OMNI’s web site:

http://www.omnicenter.org/newsletter-archive/

    
Contents: Critical Thinking Newsletter #4, December 31, 2017 
US Culture
Fantasylandby Kurt Andersen
General
Guy Harrison, Good Thinking
Shermer, Belief versus Facts, “When Facts Fail”
Hobson, “Think More”
Bartholomew, Popular Delusions
Surfaces and Essences byDouglas R. Hofstadter and Emmanuel Sanderon the importance of analogies. 
Chomsky, “Rescuing Memory,” Interview 2016: Racism, Anti-Semitism USA;
     Spanish Civil War.
Science
McIntyre, Willful Ignorance
Helfand, A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind
Jamieson, Reason in a Dark Time, Struggle Against Climate Change
Griskevicus and Kenrick, The Rational Animal
Mooney, Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future    
Prothero, How Science Deniers Threaten Our Future
Teaching             
Lilienfeld, Teaching Critical Thinking Early Is Possible
Religion
Granados, Twenty Rebels
Thomas, “Discovery Institute Attack on Cosmos
Freedom from Religion Foundation
Center for Inquiry (CFI) and Committee for Skeptical Inquiry


Fantasyland by Kurt Andersen.  PenguinRandomHouse.com   2017.  https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/.../fantasyland...kurt-andersen/978140006721...
Fantasyland. How America Went Haywire: A 500-Year History.
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • “The single most important explanation, and the fullest explanation, of how Donald Trump became presidentof the United States . . . nothing less than the most important book that I have read this year.”—Lawrence O’Donnell
How did we get here?
In this sweeping, eloquent history of America, Kurt Andersen shows that what’s happening in our country today—this post-factual, “fake news” moment we’re all living through—is not something new, but rather the ultimate expression of our national character. America was founded by wishful dreamers, magical thinkers, and true believers, by hucksters and their suckers. Fantasy is deeply embedded in our DNA.
Over the course of five centuries—from the Salem witch trials to Scientology to the Satanic Panic of the 1980s, from P. T. Barnum to Hollywood and the anything-goes, wild-and-crazy sixties, from conspiracy theories to our fetish for guns and obsession with extraterrestrials—our love of the fantastic has made America exceptional in a way that we’ve never fully acknowledged. From the start, our ultra-individualism was attached to epic dreams and epic fantasies—every citizen was free to believe absolutely anything, or to pretend to be absolutely anybody. With the gleeful erudition and tell-it-like-it-is ferocity of a Christopher Hitchens, Andersen explores whether the great American experiment in liberty has gone off the rails.
Fantasyland could not appear at a more perfect moment. If you want to understand Donald Trump and the culture of twenty-first-century America, if you want to know how the lines between reality and illusion have become dangerously blurred, you must read this book.
ABOUT FANTASYLAND
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • “The single most important explanation, and the fullest explanation, of how Donald Trump became president of the United States . . . nothing less than the most important book that I have read this year.”—Lawrence O’Donnell

How did we get here?

In this sweeping, eloquent history of America, Kurt Andersen shows that what’s happening in our country today—this post-factual, “fake news” moment we’re all living through—is not something new, but rather the ultimate expression of our national character. America was founded by wishful dreamers, magical thinkers, and true believers, by hucksters and their suckers. Fantasy is deeply embedded in our DNA.

Over the course of five centuries—from the Salem witch trials to Scientology to the Satanic Panic of the 1980s, from P. T. Barnum to Hollywood and the anything-goes, wild-and-crazy sixties, from conspiracy theories to our fetish for guns and obsession with extraterrestrials—our love of the fantastic has made America exceptional in a way that we’ve never fully acknowledged. From the start, our ultra-individualism was attached to epic dreams and epic fantasies—every citizen was free to believe absolutely anything, or to pretend to be absolutely anybody. With the gleeful erudition and tell-it-like-it-is ferocity of a Christopher Hitchens, Andersen explores whether the great American experiment in liberty has gone off the rails.

Fantasyland could not appear at a more perfect moment. If you want to understand Donald Trump and the culture of twenty-first-century America, if you want to know how the lines between reality and illusion have become dangerously blurred, you must read this book.

Praise for Fantasyland

“With this rousing book, [Kurt] Andersen proves to be the kind of clear-eyed critic an anxious country needs in the midst of a national crisis.”San Francisco Chronicle

“A frighteningly convincing and sometimes uproarious picture of a country in steep, perhaps terminal decline that would have the founding fathers weeping into their beards.”The Guardian

“This is an important book—the indispensable book—for understanding America in the age of Trump. It’s an eye-opening history filled with brilliant insights, a saga of how we were always susceptible to fantasy, from the Puritan fanatics to the talk-radio and Internet wackos who mix show business, hucksterism, and conspiracy theories.”—Walter Isaacson, #1 New York Timesbestselling author of Leonardo da Vinci
SEE LESS
KURT ANDERSEN.  FANTASYLAND: HOW AMERICA WENT HAYWIRE: A 500-YEAR HISTORY.  2017.   Interview by Michael Werner.  “How the Loss of Critical Reasoning is Harming America.” The Humanist (Jan-Feb 2018)
https://thehumanist.com/magazine/january.../loss-critical-reasoning-harming-america
Dec 20, 2017. Your new book, Fantasyland: How America Went Haywire: A 500-Year History, is a theory about how the triumph of the radical right, and Donald Trump in particular, are only part of the culmination of a long historical process. Can you explain? KURT ANDERSEN: We began, of course, ...

GENERAL
Guy Harrison.  Good Thinking.  Prometheus, 2015.  290pp.  Briefly rev. in Skeptical Inquirer (Nov. Dec. 2015):  A“guide based on the view that skepticism is the essential posture for the twenty-first century human being and critical thinking the indispensable skill for living in modern society.”  An earlier book by this author:  Think: Why You Should Question Everything.  --Dick
On Think:  “A clear and passionate book on skepticism, clear thinking, and a wide range of juicy paranormal claims. A great and fun read for everyone. Harrison succeeds at motivating, inspiring, and indeed haunting the reader. As he says, ‘Think before you believe.’ Required reading for anyone who doesn’t want to waste time, health, money, and dignity on things that probably are not real or true.”   —Jonathan C. Smith, PhD, professor of psychology, Chicago’s Roosevelt University; author of Pseudoscience and Extraordinary Claims of the Paranormal
Guy P. Harrison is an award-winning journalist and the author of Think: Why You Should Question Everything, 50 Simple Questions for Every Christian, 50 Popular Beliefs That People Think Are True, 50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God, and Race and Reality: What Everyone Should Know about Our Biological Diversity. He has won several international awards for his writing, including the World Health Organization's award for health reporting and the Commonwealth Media Award for Excellence in Journalism.

How to Convince Someone When Facts Fail  Why worldview threats undermine evidence   By Michael Shermer | Scientific American January 2017 Issue
Have you ever noticed that when you present people with facts that are contrary to their deepest held beliefs they always change their minds? Me neither. In fact, people seem to double down on their beliefs in the teeth of overwhelming evidence against them. The reason is related to the worldview perceived to be under threat by the conflicting data.
Creationists, for example, dispute the evidence for evolution in fossils and DNA because they are concerned about secular forces encroaching on religious faith. Anti-vaxxers distrust big pharma and think that money corrupts medicine, which leads them to believe that vaccines cause autism despite the inconvenient truth that the one and only study claiming such a link was retracted and its lead author accused of fraud. The 9/11 truthers focus on minutiae like the melting point of steel in the World Trade Center buildings that caused their collapse because they think the government lies and conducts “false flag” operations to create a New World Order. Climate deniers study tree rings, ice cores and the ppm of greenhouse gases because they are passionate about freedom, especially that of markets and industries to operate unencumbered by restrictive government regulations. Obama birthers desperately dissected the president's long-form birth certificate in search of fraud because they believe that the nation's first African-American president is a socialist bent on destroying the country.  MORE  | Scientific American January 2017 Issue
This article was originally published with the title "When Facts Backfire"
Michael Shermer is publisher of Skeptic magazine (www.skeptic.com). His book The Moral Arc (Henry Holt, 2015) is out in paperback.

Art Hobson, ahobson@uark.edu NWA Times.   25 August 2015 “Think more, believe less.”
All of us base our actions on a mixture of beliefs and conclusions. "Beliefs" are principles, generally inculcated by upbringing and tradition, to which we are attached emotionally, fervently, and certainly. "Conclusions" are more rational, more tentative, and based on evidence from daily life or information sources such as newspapers. This distinction is subtle, sometimes ambiguous, but crucial. There is ample evidence in the turmoil and tragedy of nearly every Mideast nation today that a population's strong attachment to extreme beliefs leads to disastrous public policy. I would also argue that the social success of northern Europe demonstrates that nations operating more on conclusions and less on beliefs are more successful. I'm painting with a broad brush in the two preceding sentences, and there are plenty of exceptions, but the general point is valid. For just one example, a 2015 CNN poll of national happiness listed 7 northern European nations plus Canada, New Zealand, and Australia as the 10 happiest nations in the world. In my opinion, this is partly a consequence of the low level of religious belief in northern Europe, along with their moderate and rational politics (welfare state capitalism). America is an anomaly in that it is rich, highly dysfunctional socially, and highly religious. There's strong evidence the latter two are linked, much as they are in the Mideast. In 2009, paleontologist and sociologist Gregory Paul published a study of religion and dysfunctionality, based on existing statistics, of 17 prosperous nations including most of western Europe, Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, and the U.S. He ranked nations on the basis of 25 social indicators such as homicide rates, teenage abortion rates, and poverty rates, and 9 religiosity indicators such as belief in God, frequency of prayer, and biblical literalism. Paul found a high correlation between religiosity and social dysfunction. The U.S. was an extreme outlier, being by far the most socially dysfunctional and by far the most religious. Ireland and Italy were similar but less extreme. At the other end of both scales were Japan, Sweden, and Denmark as least religious and least dysfunctional. America is also exceptional in basing national policy on beliefs rather than conclusions. Here are a few examples. Global warming: A remarkable scientific consensus agrees global warming is real, it poses a serious threat, and it's caused primarily by humans. Yet only 67 percent of Americans think Earth is getting warmer. Breaking this figure down politically, 84 percent of Democrats, 46 percent of Republicans, and 25 percent of Tea Party Republicans agree Earth is getting warmer. Thus we see a cultural divide between "thinkers" and "believers" on this issue. Biological evolution: Only 47 percent of Americans agree with the overwhelming consensus among biological scientists that humans developed from earlier species of animals. Incredibly, according to a 2014 Gallup poll, 42 percent of Americans believe that God created humans within the past 10,000 years. Among Gregory Paul's 16 other prosperous nations, agreement with the scientific consensus ranges from 64 percent (Ireland) to 80 percent (Sweden, Japan, Denmark, France). Abortion: It's superstitious dogma to argue that a new fetus--a fertilized egg--is fully human and to argue, as for example Republican candidate Mike Huckabee does, that it should be accorded full constitutional rights. This would imply that abortion is always murder, in which case nature or God would be the world's most prolific murderer, because most fertilized eggs either do not implant in the uterus or else miscarry after implantation. A fetus only begins to become fully human when organized brain waves appear, which occurs in the seventh month of pregnancy. Ironically, the evidence shows that legal restrictions on abortions actually increase abortions: Internationally, the legality of abortion is negatively correlated with its frequency. Thus those who oppose abortion should, rationally, support organizations such as Planned Parenthood and oppose restrictions on the procedure. Guns and violence: A committed core of true believers continues to resist rational restrictions on gun ownership in America, despite massive evidence that widespread gun ownership is strongly linked to homicide and injury. Peer nations with much stronger gun restrictions have far lower homicide rates, and Americans living in states such as Arkansas having high gun ownership rates are four times more likely to be killed by a gun than are Americans living in states having low gun ownership rates (see my August 4 column). Could America find solutions to its social dysfunctionality by relying less on emotional beliefs and more on rational conclusions? The evidence seems to answer "yes."

Robert Bartholomew and Peter Hassall.  A Colorful History of Popular Delusions.  Prometheus, 2015.  352pp.  Conceptualizes two main categories—social panics and enthusiasms—and 12 topics.  –Dick

Surfaces and Essences BYDouglas R. Hofstadter and Emmanuel SanderBasic Books, 2013. 

From the simplest forms (a single word, category, or phrase) to infinitely complex constructions (an idiom, or proverb, or algorithm) analogies are the tools our brains use to interpret and master daily life. This book argues that analogy is the basis for all human thoughts.
Full description

 “Rescuing Memory.  The Humanist Interview with Noam Chomsky” by Jorge Majfud.  The Humanist (July-Aug. 2016).
At the age of eighty-seven, the renowned linguist, philosopher, historian, cognitive scientist, and critic Noam Chomsky maintains the same clarity found in any of his books, lectures, or television appearances dating back to the 1970s. While in a face-to-face conversation he might adopt an informal and humorous tone towards relevant topics, he is very much that same serious and detailed thinker we all recognize from the conferences and different interviews—one of those individuals history will remember for centuries.  MORE http://thehumanist.com/magazine/july-august-2016/features/rescuing-memory

SCIENCE
Lee McIntyre.  Respecting Truth: Willful Ignorance in the I  nternet Age.  Routledge, 2015.  150pp.   Briefly rev. in Skeptical Inquirer (Nov. Dec. 2015):  The natural sciences are under attack by people who routinely reject “the findings of science they find inconvenient.”  --D

,A Survival Guide to the Misinformation Age: Scientific Habits of Mind.  By David J. Helfand. Columbia Univ, $29.95 (336p)

We live in the Information Age, with billions of bytes of data all just two swipes away. But how much of this is of value? How much is mis-, or even dis-information? Lots. And your search engine can’t tell the difference. As a result, an avalanche of misinformation threatens to overwhelm the rational discourse we so desperately need to address complex social problems such as climate change, the food and water crises, biodiversity collapse, and emerging threats to public health. This book provides an inoculation against the misinformation epidemic by cultivating scientific habits of mind. Anyone can do it — indeed, everyone must do it if our species is to long survive on this crowded and finite planet.
 "A Survival Guide for the Misinformation Age is an impassioned plea for science literacy. Given the state of the world today, in which scientifically under-informed voters elect scientifically illiterate politicians, Professor David Helfand has written the right book at the right time with the right message. Read it now. The future of our civilization may depend on it."
--Neil deGrasse Tyson, Astrophysicist
Publishers Weekly
http://www.publishersweekly.com/images/print.gif
Advertisers, public figures, and the media in general regularly misinform the public, but the Internet has taken this to a new level, reports Helfand, former chair of Columbia University’s department of astronomy. This cheerful corrective defines and demolishes many categories of nonsense. Warning that the brain is programmed to find patterns where none exist and to prefer simple, vivid explanations for reality, Helfand proceeds to show how competent scientists work and how to tell good evidence from bad. This turns out to be no simple task. Even scientists fail regularly, and readers must be prepared for meticulous explanations of scatter plots, Gaussian and Poisson distributions, proxies, and probability. Popular science writers traditionally boast that they will go light on mathematics, but Helfand will have none of that. As Jonathan Swift wrote, “Reasoning will never make a man correct an ill opinion which by reasoning he never acquired,” so this book will not attract climate-change deniers, anti-vaccine activists, creationists, astrology lovers, and the like. Darrell Huff’s delightful 1954 classic How to Lie with Statistics may be more accessible, but Helfand’s work is an admirable response to a long-standing problem of sloppy thinking. (Mar. 2016)



DALE JAMIESON, REASON IN A DARK TIME: WHY THE STRUGGLE AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE FAILED—AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR OUR FUTURE.  OXFORD UP, 2014.
Description
  
·         Not a "save the earth" book but a sober diagnosis of why we have failed and a proposal for concrete steps for how to move ahead.   Argues that common sense notions of responsibility are inadequate for moralizing acts that contribute to climate change.   Reflects on how we, as individuals, can live meaningful lives in the face of climate change.  Treats the scientific, historical, economic, and political dimensions of climate changes as well as the philosophical ones.

The Rational Animal: How Evolution Made Us Smarter Than We Think by Vladas Griskevicius and Douglas Kenrickuses evolutionary lens to explain irrational decisions.

New Book from University of Minnesota Business Professor Suggests We’re Not Really That Stupid.


https://www.aps.org/units/fed/newsletters/fall2009/hobson.cfm
by Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum (Basic Books, New York, NY, 2009); 132 pages of text plus 66 pages of notes, ISBN 978-0-465001305-0. Reviewed by Art Hobson. The rift between science and mainstream American culture is growing ever wider, says this book. Chris Mooney should know; his 2005 book The ...

Reality Check: How Science Deniers Threaten Our Future

Donald R. Prothero.  U of Indiana P, 2013.
Foreword by Michael Shermer


Table of Contents

Related Links

The battles over evolution, climate change, childhood vaccinations, and the causes of AIDS, alternative medicine, oil shortages, population growth, and the place of science in our country—all are reaching a fevered pitch. Many people and institutions have exerted enormous efforts to misrepresent or flatly deny demonstrable scientific reality to protect their nonscientific ideology, their power, or their bottom line. To shed light on this darkness, Donald R. Prothero explains the scientific process and why society has come to rely on science not only to provide a better life but also to reach verifiable truths no other method can obtain. He describes how major scientific ideas that are accepted by the entire scientific community (evolution, anthropogenic global warming, vaccination, the HIV cause of AIDS, and others) have been attacked with totally unscientific arguments and methods. Prothero argues that science deniers pose a serious threat to society, as their attempts to subvert the truth have resulted in widespread scientific ignorance, increased risk of global catastrophes, and deaths due to the spread of diseases that could have been prevented.




TEACHING
2017 is a good time, when people are so aware of political chicanery, to advocate teaching critical thinking in the public schools, not only in specific courses by that title, but the encouragement of all teachers in all classes to ask frequent questions about the content of their classes.   And it could begin in K.   Dick
Scott O. Lilienfeld.  “Teaching Skepticism [critical thinking]: How Early Can We Begin?”  Skeptical Inquirer (Sept.-Oct. 2017).   Cautiously optimistic.  --Dick
The teaching of courses in the science and … - Lilienfeld - Cited by 43
www.apa.org › ... › Precollege and Undergraduate › Psychology Teacher Network
by SO Lilienfeld - ‎Related articles
Key teaching tip: Provide students with research that contradicts each of these claims (see Lilienfeld et al., 2010) and repeatedly test students on these claims' ...
journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00459/full
by RM Schmaltz - ‎2017 - ‎Related articles
Mar 13, 2017 - Teaching skepticism via the CRITIC acronym and the skeptical inquirer. Skeptical ....Lilienfeld, S. O., Ammirati, R., and David, M. (2012).


RELIGION
Advocating progressive values and equality for humanists, atheists, and freethinkers
·         ABOUT THE AHA »
·         WHAT IS HUMANISM »
·         OUR WORK »
·         AHA NEWS »
·         SUPPORT HUMANISM »
LUIS GRANADOS, DAMNED GOOD COMPANY: TWENTY REBELS WHO BUCKED THE GOD EXPERTS.  Humanist P, 2012.
Latest Humanist Press Ebook Includes Online Reader Commentary, Linked Videos
 (Washington, DC – July 31, 2012) – The power that comes from religious authority has been at the center of all human societies from time immemorial–but those claims of sovereignty have been disputed for just as long. In Damned Good Company: Twenty Rebels Who Bucked the God Experts, author Luis Granados explores twenty cases, from Socrates to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, of brave challenges against those claiming a special authority from God.
Damned Good Company is a book about people, not about God. People who have preached about God, taken money for sharing what they say they know about God, and ordered others about to enforce what they claim to be God’s will–and a small band of heroes who stood up to them.
In short, Damned Good Company is a Profiles in Courage for humanists.
Some of the twenty heroes of Damned Good Company are well-known: Erasmus, Voltaire, Thomas Paine, Clarence Darrow, Atatürk, Nehru, Steve Biko. Others are not: people like Han Yü, banished from the 9th century Chinese court for questioning the worship of the Buddha’s finger, and Lucy Harris, who came within an inch of deflating Mormonism before it got off the ground.
Each hero is contrasted with a villain of his or her time and place: either a God expert like Martin Luther or Joseph Smith or a cynical politician like Mussolini, who never believed in God but exploited religion shamelessly to advance his political ambition.
The stories in Damned Good Company will inspire those today who want to stand up to the Christian Right, the Muslim fanatics, the oppressiveness of Catholic and Jewish orthodoxy, the rising Hindu Taliban, and everyone else who claims a God-given right to tell the rest of us what to do.
This enhanced ebook has been extensively researched, with over 1,100 footnotes. It takes full advantage of state-of-the-art features with over 100 photographs, online reader comments, linked videos, and hundreds of useful web links.
Damned Good Company is available from HumanistPress.com and all major online ebook retailers.
Brief video summaries of each chapter can be found here: https://vimeo.com/album/2002877
Humanist Press is the publishing house of the American Humanist Association, providing material for the humanist/freethought/atheist market since 1995. The American Humanist Association (www.americanhumanist.org) advocates for the rights and viewpoints of humanists and atheists in the United States. Founded in 1941 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., its work is extended through more than 150 local chapters and affiliates across America.   Humanism is a progressive philosophy of life that, without theism, affirms our responsibility to lead ethical lives of value to self and humanity.

 




 “Discovery Institute Attack on Cosmos Provides a Teaching Moment of Its Own”  Dave Thomas   | 4 Comments

I’ve a brief new article in the new Skeptical Inquirer (July/August 2014) regarding Casey Luskin’s botched attack on the second episode of Cosmos. Here it follows - your comments are welcomed.
Fox TV’s Seth McFarlane has joined with astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson and Ann Druyan, Carl Sagan’s widow and collaborator, to continue Sagan’s marvelous Cosmos series of decades ago. The new series is a splendid blend of homage to Sagan’s original one with dazzling new graphics–and new discoveries.
The second episode of the series, first broadcast March 16, 2014, covered evolution and natural selection. (Link) As expected, creationists were furious. The main promoter of “intelligent design,” Seattle’s Discovery Institute, has run several anti-Cosmos blogs on its Evolution News and Views (ENV) website.
In their zeal to attack Tyson and the Cosmosseries, however, the Discovery Institute has created a stunning example of the straw man logical fallacy. This fallacy is so named because it involves attacking one’s opponent not by an honest dissection of his or her actual views but by attacking a caricature, a distorted misrepresentation of those views. The Discovery Institute’s attack on the evolution episode of Cosmos was a particularly egregious example of this fallacy–a straw man for the ages, as it were.  MORE click on author above



Freedom From Religion Foundation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Freedom From Religion Foundation
FFR.png
The Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) is an American non-profit organization based in Madison, Wisconsin, with members from all 50 states.[1] The largest national organization advocating for non-theists, FFRF promotes the separation of church and state and educates the public on matters relating to atheism, agnosticism and nontheism. The FFRF publishes a newspaper, Freethought Today. Since 2006, the Foundation has produced the Freethought Radio show.
The FFRF was co-founded by Anne Nicol Gaylor and her daughter, Annie Laurie Gaylor, in 1976 and was incorporated nationally in 1978.[2] The organization is supported by over 19,000 members[3] and operates from an 1855-era building in Madison, Wisconsin, that once served as a church rectory. According to the 2011 IRS tax Form-990,[4] FFRF spent just over $200,000 on legal fees and services and just under $1 million on education, outreach, publishing, broadcasting, and events. The allotment for legal fees is primarily used in cases supporting the separation of church and state that involve governmental entities. FFRF also has a paid staff of thirteen, including four full-time staff attorneys.[5]
Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the FFRF, is the author of Women Without Superstition: No Gods - No Masters and the nonfiction book on clergy pedophilia scandalsBetrayal of Trust: Clergy Abuse of Children (out of print) and editor of the anthology Woe to the Women. She edited the FFRF newspaper Freethought Today until July, 2008. Her husband, Dan Barker, author of Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist, Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America’s Leading Atheists, The Good Atheist: Living a Purpose-Filled Life Without God and Just Pretend: A Freethought Book for Children, is a musician and songwriter, a former Pentecostal Christian minister, and co-president of the FFRF.
In March 2011, The FFRF, along with the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science, began The Clergy Project, a confidential on-line community that supports clergy as they leave their faith.[6][7] In 2012, it gave its first Freedom From Religion Foundation and Clergy Project "Hardship Grant" to Jerry DeWitt, a former pastor of 38 years who left the ministry to join the atheist movement.[8]

www.centerforinquiry.net/
Center for Inquiry  4-12-16
The mission of the Center for Inquiry is to foster a secular society based on science, reason, freedom of inquiry, and humanist values. Learn more about CFI » ...
About the Center For Inquiry. The mission of the Center for Inquiry ...
A Dereliction of Duty: Demand the Senate Vote on the ...
Education. The educational programs of CFI are ...
Discussion Forums. hide Category. Forum Name, Topics, Replies ...
Podcasts. Point of Inquiry. Launched in 2005, Point of ...
Advocacy. The Center for Inquiry advocates for science, reason ...
Publisher of the Skeptical Inquirer magazine.  Some contents of May/June 2016 number:   “Creators of the Paranormal”   “How Not to Do Science”   “A Testament of Belief Masquerading as Science”   Book reviews, including The Art and Science of the Scam: Implications for Skeptics”  --Dick


Contents #1
Critical Thinking for Media Analysis
Fox Propaganda Techniques
Bin Laden and Black/White Thinking
Labeling
Historical Analogy
Demonization
Anti-Intellectualism
Global Warming Disinformation and Denial
Al Gore’s The Assault on Reason

Contents of #2
Hallucinations
The Only Physicist in Congress
Natural and Unnatural Thinking
Fallacies and Ideologies
20 Logical Fallacies
Importance of Dissent
Books Reviewed in Skeptical Inquirer (Nov. Dec. 2012) (the contents of every number devoted to CT) :
  David McRaney, You Are Not So Smart,,,and 46 Other Ways You’re Deluding Yourself.  
  Jan Harold Brunvand, Encyclopedia of Urban Legends. 
  William Gardner, Handling Truth.a



Contents Critical Thinking #3

http://jamesrichardbennett.blogspot.com/2013/03/critical-thinking-newsletter-3.html

Henschel and Krueger, Fayetteville Free Thinkers
Krueger’s CT Course at NWACC
Jordan, The Enlightenment
Sanders, Commercial and Political Deception
Skeptical Inquirer
Pigliucci, How People Think About Politics, Defending Our Beliefs
Elder and Paul, book Critical Thinking
Gordin, Pseudoscience
Catania, Economic Cons, Frauds, Scams

END CRITICAL THINKING NEWSLETTER #4,


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 902

Trending Articles